Background : With the recent progression of the aging society in Japan, what is now seen as important is not simply treatment of disease alone, but also increased quality of life. We have investigated the correlation between the feeling of subjective health and mortality after mean 3.8 year among local residents.
Methods : In fiscal 2008, a self-recording questionnaire survey was conducted by mailing the questionnaire to 2,657 local residents. Correlation with deaths after mean 3.8 years was investigated based on the Resident Register. With regard to the evaluation items, as background factors related to death, social life conditions (gender·age), health conditions (history of cardiovascular disease, state of depression, subjective happiness, subjective health)and basic activities of daily living (BADL : walking, diet, excretion, bathing, dressing, and ambulation)were evaluated using a 4-point scale ranging from total assistance to completely independent. The Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology (TMIG : instrumental independence, intellectual activity, and social role)was used to evaluate the lifestyle factors.
Results : Of 1825 subjects, 767 males (mean age : 67±13 years)and 1058 females (mean age : 68±11 years), could be analyzed. There were 91 deaths from 2008 to 2012. Investigation of factors that increased subjective health revealed that age, cardiovascular disease, state of depression, intellectual activities, and subjective happiness were items that showed significant correlation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that subjective health was a significant explanatory variable of death.
Conclusion : How one personally feels about one's state of health and how one recognizes that, are important. Though not seen physically, they can be considered as important parameters that predict prognosis.

Background: Gingyo-gedoku-san (GGGS) is an herbal medicine approved for upper respiratory infections in Japan. We conducted an open-label, multi-center, prospective trial, comparing GGGS with oseltamivir in patients with influenza and influenza-like illness (ILI) as a pilot study.
Methods: Subjects were healthy persons aged between 16 and 40, and were enrolled from January 12, 2010 to March 24, 2011. Fifteen patients were enrolled in this trial (8 and 7 for GGGS and oseltamivir, respectively). RT-PCR was positive for pandemic influenza A (H1N1) in 10 patients. The patients were provided with either GGGS or oseltamivir for 5 days. The primary outcome was mortality and/or hospitalization 7 days after the initial diagnosis. Body temperature and other clinical characteristics were also evaluated.
Results: All patients recovered from illness without complication or hospitalization. The mean time to resolve symptoms for the GGGS and oseltamivir groups was 3.9 days and 3.3 days, respectively (p=0.43). The GGGS group appeared to have a smaller symptom score AUC than the oseltamivir group, (p=0.26). Time to recover activity level appeared to be shorter in the GGGS group (p=0.10), with shorter time to recover health status (p=0.02). Sub-group analysis on patients with positive PCR showed similar results between the two groups.
Conclusion: GGGS was associated with symptom improvements resembling oseltamivir for both influenza and ILI. Randomized controlled trials involving larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these results.

This study aimed to clarify the resources required to relieve distress during palliative care delivery to cancer patients. Between April 2015 and March 2017, 1479 outpatients receiving chemotherapy for cancer were screened using the Japanese version of the Support Team Assessment Schedule (STAS-J). When the STAS-J result was 2 points and higher, the patient was considered positive for distress. A certified nurse or pharmacist performed STAS-J screening and, in cases where the patient exhibited distress, took steps to alleviate the problem themselves or consulted another resource. Distress was identified in 181 (12.2%) of the 1479 patients. These 181 patients needed 288 resources. The resources used to alleviate distress were categorized as follows: direct support by certified nurse or pharmacist (153), consultation with the attending physician (98) and other (37). The required resource included the following twelve professionals: attending physician, ophthalmologist, dermatologist, dentist, orthopedic surgeon, palliative care physician, certified nurse, certified pharmacist, medical social worker, clinical psychologist, volunteers for cancer patients, and palliative care team. The frequency of the intervention by the certified nurse or pharmacist (61, 39.9%) in directly alleviating psychiatric distress was significantly higher than by consultation with the attending physician (10, 10.2%) (p<0.0001). However, the frequency of consultation with the attending physician in alleviating physical distress (88, 89.8%) was significantly higher than that of the certified nurse or pharmacist (92, 60.1%) (p<0.0001). We conclude that the certified nurse or pharmacist is important for the delivery of palliative cancer care, because they can directly provide relief from psychiatric distress.