1.Endoscopy with Conscious Sedation.
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 1999;42(11):1075-1082
No abstract available.
Conscious Sedation*
;
Endoscopy*
2.Preparation, Evaluation, and Recovery before and after Conscious Sedative Endoscopy.
Hong Jun PARK ; Byoung Kwan SON ; Hoon Sup KOO ; Byung Wook KIM
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2017;69(1):59-63
No abstract available.
Conscious Sedation
;
Endoscopy*
3.Aspiration of a sponge during conscious sedation.
Ji Young LEE ; Jin Young CHON ; Hyun Jung KOH ; Yu Mi JU ; Mi Ran PARK
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2013;65(6 Suppl):S14-S15
No abstract available.
Conscious Sedation*
;
Porifera*
7.Conscious Sedation with Midazolam Combined with Propofol for Colonoscopy.
Ja Seol KOO ; Jai Hyun CHOI ; Sung Woo JUNG ; Woo Sik HAN ; Jong Sup LEE ; Hyung Joon YIM ; Yoon Tae JEEN ; Hoon Jai CHUN ; Hong Sik LEE ; Sang Woo LEE ; Chang Duck KIM ; Ho Sang RYU
Korean Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2007;34(6):298-303
BACKGROUND/AIMS: There is increasing interest in the use of propofol as a sedative agent for colonoscopy. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the synergistic sedation with midazolam combined with low-dose propofol versus that of midazolam alone. METHODS: A total of 56 patients from among those who underwent total colonoscopy between August 2004 and October 2004 were randomly assigned to one of three medication treatment groups. Group A (n=18) received low-dose midazolam (0.03 mg/kg IV) plus propofol, group B (n=19) received high-dose midazolam (0.07 mg/kg IV) plus propofol, and group C (n=19) received high-dose midazolam alone. The patients' vital signs were monitored throughout the course of the study. The recovery time and quality as well as the patients' comfort level were also assessed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics among the treatment groups. There were also no differences in the duration and insertion time of the colonoscopy among the three groups. The patients' comfort level and cardiorespiratory parameters during colonoscopy were similar among the three groups. The sedation efficacy and recovery times were also similar among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Midazolam combined with low-dose propofol as a sedative for colonoscopy exhibits similar effects on safety, patient' comfort level and recovery time to those of midazolam alone.
Colonoscopy*
;
Conscious Sedation*
;
Humans
;
Midazolam*
;
Propofol*
;
Vital Signs
8.Conscious Sedation Using Target-Controlled Infusion with Propofol in Regional Anesthesia Patients.
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2000;38(1):20-24
BACKGROUND: The technique using target-controlled infusion (TCI) with propofol produces safe intraoperative sedation during regional anesthesia with rapid recovery and high patient satisfaction. The objective of this study was to define the blood propofol concentration necessary for conscious sedation in regional anesthesia patients according to age. METHODS: Sixty patients scheduled to undergo regional anesthesia were allocated into one of three groups according to age, such as group 1 (n = 20): 16 24 yr, group 2 (n = 20): 30 39 yr, group 3 (n = 20): 40 55 yr. Thirty minutes after performing regional anesthesia, TCI of propofol started at a target plasma level of 1 microgram/ml adjusted in steps of 0.2 microgram/ml to maintain a sedation level 3 on a 5-point sedation scale. RESULTS: The mean target concentration was 0.9 microgram/ml (group 1), 0.8 microgram/ml (group 2), 0.7 microgram/ml (group 3). The mean propofol consumption was 38.5 microgram/kg/min (group 1), 34.3 microgram/kg/min (group 2), and 30.8 microgram/kg/min (group 3). The recovery time was significantly delayed in group 3 (2.8 min) compared to group 1 (1.5 min) and group 2 (1.8 min). CONCLUSIONS: TCI of propofol within at 0.7 0.9 microgram/ml blood concentration range produces safe intraoperative sedation during regional anesthesia with rapid induction, rapid recovery and high patient satisfaction without severe complications in 16 55 yr old patients.
Anesthesia, Conduction*
;
Conscious Sedation*
;
Humans
;
Patient Satisfaction
;
Plasma
;
Propofol*
9.The Effects of Aroma Foot Massage on the Anxiety, Pain and Sleep Satisfaction during Colonoscopy under Conscious Sedation.
Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing 2006;17(1):91-101
PURPOSE: This research is to know whether aroma foot massage has influence on the relief of anxiety and pain during colonoscopy under conscious sedation. METHOD: This research was designed as a quasi-experiment of non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest. Data were collected from April 1 2005 to August 30 2005. The subjects were divided into three groups (control group, foot massage group and aroma foot massage group) with 30 persons each. Anxiety was evaluated with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), blood pressure and pulse. Pain response was measured with VAS and non-verbal pain behavior score. Sleep satisfaction was measured with a graphic rating scale. Data were analyzed through Chi-square test, t-test and repeated measure ANOVA. RESULTS: Systolic blood pressure, pulse, subjective anxiety and pain scores from the aroma foot massage group decreased significantly. Sleep satisfaction score of the aroma foot massage group increased significantly. Diastolic blood pressure from the aroma foot massage group did not decrease. CONCLUSION: The results show that aroma foot massage with refined oils can increase sleep satisfaction and decrease anxiety and pain during colonoscopy under conscious sedation.
Anxiety*
;
Blood Pressure
;
Colonoscopy*
;
Conscious Sedation*
;
Foot*
;
Humans
;
Massage*
;
Oils
10.Survey of Anxiety in Ordinary Workers and Doctors Regarding Sedative Use during Endoscopic Examination in the Seoul Metropolitan Area.
Yoon Suk RA ; Chi Hyo KIM ; Youn Jin KIM ; Jong In HAN
Gut and Liver 2016;10(5):786-795
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Sedative use is common in endoscopic examinations. The anxiety regarding sedative use may be different between doctors and nonmedical individuals. METHODS: A questionnaire survey was conducted by a research company (DOOIT Survey), and responses were collected from 649 doctors and 1,738 individuals who perform typical jobs in nonmedical fields. In this study, these ordinary workers are considered to represent nonmedical individuals. Anxiety was measured using a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: The nonmedical individuals exhibited more anxiety regarding the sedative use than the doctors. Age <40 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.27; p<0.001), female sex (OR, 1.62; p=0.002), experience of an adverse event (OR, 1.79; p=0.049), and insufficient explanation (OR, 2.05; p<0.001) were the significant factors that increased the anxiety of the nonmedical individuals. The doctors who experienced a sedative-related adverse event reported increased anxiety compared with the doctors who did not report this experience (OR, 1.73; p=0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety regarding sedative use during an endoscopic examination was significantly different between doctors and non-medical individuals. A younger age, female sex, an adverse event, and insufficient explanation affect the anxiety of nonmedical individuals. An adverse event also affects the anxiety of doctors.
Anxiety*
;
Conscious Sedation
;
Endoscopy
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Seoul*
;
Surveys and Questionnaires