1.OPTIMIZATION OF CONDITIONS FOR FERMENTATION OF BIOSURFACTANT PRODUCED BY PSEUDOMONAS SP. L-11
Qing-Xin LI ; Cong-Bao RANG ; Hao WANG ; Chang-Kai ZHANG ;
Microbiology 1992;0(02):-
A strain of pseudomonas sp. L-11 could produce biosurfactants by use of glucose as substrate. The fermentation conditions in shaking flask and 1L fennentor were investigated. The optimal medium and (he fermentation technology were demonstrated. In 1L fermentor, the interracial tension between the diluent of L-11 (10%) and crude oil is 5.3?10~3mN/m, which is fit for microbial enhanced oil recovery. The scale-up technology of L-11 was also studied.
2.Design of ABC damage variable and positioning system for acetabular fractures and 1122 cases multi-center statistic analysis.
Chun-cai ZHANG ; Shuo-gui XU ; Bao-qing YU ; Fang JI ; Qing-ge FU ; Xin-wei LIU ; Yun-tong ZHANG ; Yun-fei NIU ; Pan-feng WANG ; Jia-can SU ; Lie-hu CAO ; Yong-qing XU ; Mo RUAN ; Zhuang-hong CHEN ; Ji-feng HUANG ; Xian-hua CAI ; Hui-liang SHEN ; Li-min LIU ; Ji-fang WANG ; Yan WANG ; Pei-fu TANG ; Yu-tian LIANG ; Jia-rang WANG ; Yu-ri WANG ; Zhen-hao WANG ; Wen-di LIU ; Wen-rui LI ; Wen-hu LI ; Xu-quan WANG ; Dong-sheng ZHOU ; Peng ZHANG ; Ren WANG ; Gang WANG ; Yu-yue CHEN ; Yong-jian CONG
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2011;24(2):102-108
OBJECTIVETo design ABC damage variable and positioning system for acetabular fracture and explore the feasibility and clinical practical value of the system through the multi-center analysis of 1122 acetabular fractures.
METHODSAccording to acetabular three-column conception, and pelvic ring lesions damage direction caused by acetabular fracture domino effect and injury degree of proximal femur joint, it defined class A as any column acetabular fracture; class B as any two-column acetabular fracture; class C as front, dome and posterior mixture acetabular fracture. Lower case English letters a, m, p represented front, dome, posterior fracture, respectively. Acetabular damage variables: 1 was simple displaced fractures; 2 was comminuted fractures; 3 was compression fractures. Pelvic ring lesions damage variables: alpha was sacroiliac joints or sacroiliac fracture horizontal separation deflection; beta was sacroiliac joints or sacroiliac fracture vertical separation deflection; gamma was pubic symphysis separation/superior and inferior ramus of pubis fracture deflection; alpha beta gamma delta was compound floating damage. Proximal humerus joint damage variables: I was femoral head fracture; II was femoral neck fracture; II was intertrochanteric fractures of femur; IV was I to III compound fracture. The ABC damage variable positioning system for acetabular fracture was made up by the above-mentioned variables. The statistics from March 1997 to February 2010 showed 1122 cases acetabular fractures with 18 cases of double side acetabular fracture and 1140 cases of acetabular fractures. The pelvics anterior-posterior view, ilium and obturator oblique view, and 2/3D-CT materials were analyzed and researched.
RESULTSEach damage variables distribution situation in 1140 cases of acetabular fracture involved A in 237 cases (20.8%), B in 605 cases (53.1%), C in 298 cases (26.1%);front column fracture in 808 cases(70.9%), dome fracture in 507 cases (44.5%), posterior fracture in 1026 cases (90%). Acetabular variables: variabe 1 in 203 cases of simple displaced fracture (17.8%); variabe 2 in 516 cases of comminuted fracture(45.3%); variabe 3 in 421 cases of compression fracture (36.9%); 249 cases of pelvic ring lesions damage (21.8%), 75 cases femoral head fracture (6.6%); 18 cases of double side acetabular fracture and relative pelvic ring and proximal humerus joint variables (1.58%). Key part and curative effect elements of 1140 cases acetabular fracture: 507 cases of dome or posterior acetabular fracture (44.5%); 421 cases of compression fracture (36.9%); 249 cases of pelvic ring variables (21.8%); 75 cases of proximal humerus joint variables (6.6%); 486 cases of simple Aa/pl/2,Bapl/2 acetabular fracture (42.6% ).
CONCLUSIONCompression fracture, especially defected compression fracture, takes important part in acetabular damage variables, and also presents that acetabular fracture with pelvic ring and proximal femoral damage variables are not rare at all. The relationship of the acetabular fracture damage variables, and its percentage shows the key points and elements in clinical treatment: weight-bearing to dome accounts for 44.5%; compression to defects account for 36.9%, pelvic ring to float accounts for 21.8%; dome fracture to double side fracture account for 6.6%. The system has significant guiding effects on clinic in terms of evaluation of injury severity, anatomic localization, difficulty index, alternative strategy, operative approach, effect of treatment,and prognosis. And the most important thing is that the system creates the comparison of damage variables in same type of fracture and the communication of homo-language and explores a new method.
Acetabulum ; injuries ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Child ; Female ; Fractures, Bone ; classification ; diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Male ; Medical Informatics ; methods ; Middle Aged ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Young Adult