Objective Acute kidney injury (AKI) frequently occurs after catheter-based interventional procedures and increases mortality. How-ever, the implications of AKI before thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) of type B acute aortic dissection (AAD) remain un-clear. This study evaluated the incidence, predictors, and in-hospital outcomes of AKI before TEVAR in patients with type B AAD. Meth-ods Between 2009 and 2013, 76 patients were retrospectively evaluated who received TEVAR for type B AAD within 36 h from symptom onset. The patients were classified into no-AKI vs. AKI groups, and the severity of AKI was further staged according to kidney disease:im-proving global outcomes criteria before TEVAR. Results The incidence of preoperative AKI was 36.8%. In-hospital complications was significantly higher in patients with preoperative AKI compared with no-AKI (50.0%vs. 4.2%, respectively;P<0.001), including acute renal failure (21.4%vs. 0, respectively;P<0.001), and they increased with severity of AKI (P<0.001). The maximum levels of body tem-perature and white blood cell count were significantly related to maximum serum creatinine level before TEVAR. Multivariate analysis showed that systolic blood pressure on admission (OR:1.023;95%CI:1.003–1.044;P=0.0238) and bilateral renal artery involvement (OR:19.076;95%CI:1.914–190.164;P=0.0120) were strong predictors of preoperative AKI. Conclusions Preoperative AKI frequently oc-curred in patients with type B AAD, and correlated with higher in-hospital complications and enhanced inflammatory reaction. Systolic blood pressure on admission and bilateral renal artery involvement were major risk factors for AKI before TEVAR.

BACKGROUND:After arthroscopic knee surgery, deep vein thrombosis easily occurs. Currently, there were no specific clinical manifestations in deep vein thrombosis, so a fast, convenient and reliable risk assessment tool was needed to evaluate the clinical high-risk groups for prevention and intervention. The effectiveness of Caprini Risk Assessment Scale used in thrombosis risk assessment has been confirmed by a large number of researches, but the current domestic research is less.
OBJECTIVE:To verify the validity of Caprini risk assessment scale in evaluations of high deep venous thrombosis risk patients among knee arthroscopy patients, and to explore effective strategies for prevention of deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing knee arthroscopic surgery.
METHODS: A case-control study design was used to colect 49 deep vein thrombosis patients admitted to the Department of Orthopedics, Renhe Hospital of Three Gorges University from January 2008 to June 2015 as case group, and randomly selected 98 patients admitted during the same period of non-deep vein thrombosis patients as control group. Caprini risk assessment scale was used to assess risk assessment and risk grading of deep venous thrombosis, and to explore the correlation between risk classification and risk of deep vein thrombosis.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) Basic conditions comparison: application time of tourniquet, the proportion of smoking patients, and proportion of deep venous thrombosis and (or) the history of pulmonary thromboembolism were higher in the case group than in the control group (P < 0.05). (2) Caprini score was significantly higher in the case group than in the control group (P < 0.001). In the case group, the proportion of very high risk patients (53%) was highest, folowed by high risk (25%), totaly 78%. In the control group, the proportion of high risk patients (32%) was highest, folowed by low risk (29%). Significant differences in above risk degree analysis were identified between the two groups (P< 0.001). (3) Deep venous thrombosis and (or) the history of pulmonary thromboembolism was positively correlated with Caprini score in the case and control groups (P < 0.05). Caprini score was positively associated with application time of tourniquet in the case group (P< 0.05). (4) Logistic regression analysis of Caprini risk classification and the risk of deep vein thrombosis: with increased caprini risk classification, the risk of deep vein thrombosis increased significantly. The risk of deep venous thrombosis in patients with high risk and very high risk was 2.130 and 11.786 times of patients with low risk, respectively. (5) These results indicate that Caprini risk assessment model can effectively assess the risk of deep vein thrombosis among patients receiving knee arthroscopy.

Objective To study the differences between hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing children in the Five-Item Cognitive Development. Methods 32 normal-hearing children and 32 hearing-impaired children underwent the Five-Item Cognitive Development tests. Results The scores of figure reasoning, geometric reasoning and dissimilarity distinguishing were significantly lower in the hearing- impaired children than in the normal-hearing children (P<0.001). There was no difference in the scores of memory strategy and scene cognition two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Hearing-impaired children are inferior to normal-hearing children in figure reasoning, geometric reasoning and dissimilarity distinguishing, and similar in memory strategy and scene cognition