Objective:To investigate the clinically curative effects of Liyuan Pure Lysothrombusase(LYPL，力源精纯溶栓酶) on unstable angina pectoris (UAP) and to observe its safety.Methods:One hundred and twenty cases with UAP were selected and in accordance with the proportion of one to one randomly divided into treated and control group.Based on conventional therapy the LYPL infused intravenously was added in treated group.The conditions of symptomatic convalescence,the changes in electrocardiography (ECG),and the parameters of blood rheology were observed for two groups.Results:The curative effects on symptoms and ECG were 93.33％ and 88.33％ respectively in treated group but in control group they were 70.00％ and 68.33％ respectively.The difference in comparison between two groups was significant (all P<0.01).In treated group the parameters of blood rheology were obviously improved meanwhile in control group they were not.Conclusions:LYPL possesses the actions on improving blood rheology.Its curative effects on UAP are marked and it is safe and easy to use.

Objective:To observe therapeutic effect of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT ) on different types of cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) .Methods :According to patient′s conclition ,a total of 247 CRS patients were divided into type 1 group (n=47) ,type 2 group (n=51) ,type 3 group (n=55) ,type 4 group (n=49) and type 5 group (n=45) .All patients received CRRT ,echocardiography and plasma level of N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) detect to evaluate cardiac function status ;the 24h urine volume and endogenous creatinine clearance rate (Ccr) were measured to assess renal function status before and after treatment . Results:Compared with before treatment ,on one week after CRRT ,LVEF ,urine volume and Ccr level significantly rose ,NT‐proBNP level significantly reduced ( P<0.05 or <0.01) .Compared with type 4 and 5 group ,there were significant rise in LVEF [ (48.98 ± 1.55)% ,(44.67 ± 1.48)% vs .(55.13 ± 4.27)% ,(53.73 ± 3.52)% ,(57.95 ± 2.89)% ] ,urine volume [ (1118.83 ± 168.09 ) ml , (1125.47 ± 177.28 ) ml vs . (1655.67 ± 198.37 ) ml , (1697.47 ± 171.27 ) ml , (1702.72 ± 179.28) ml] and Ccr level [ (40.11 ± 1.79) ,(41.11 ± 1.39) vs .(52.33 ± 2.49) ,(50.97 ± 2.11) , (51.32 ± 2.01 )] , and significant reduction in NT‐proBNP level [ (3738.19 ± 118.77 ) , (3378.38 ± 121.82 ) vs . (2137.51 ± 123.59) ,(2421.12 ± 121.22) ,(2139.81 ± 147.28)] in type 1 ,2 and 3 group ,P<0.05 all .Conclusion:CRRT is effective on different types of CRS ,but it′s best on type 1~3 than those of type 4~5 , which may be re‐lated to different pathological mechanisms of CRS different types .

AIM: To construct eukaryotic expression vector of human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene, and to explore the effects of VEGF gene on proliferation and chemosensitivity of leukemia cells. METHODS: The recombinant eukaryotic express plasmid pEGFP-C1-hVEGF_(165) was constructed with conventional gene engineering methods. The pEGFP-C1-hVEGF_165 was transfected into leukemia cell K562. The proliferation of the recombinant eukaryotic expression plasmid was analyzed by CCK8 method. The level of VEGF mRNA was detected by reverse transcription and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The expression level of VEGF protein was determined by ELISA in cell culture medium and cells. The cell cycle was detected by flow cytometry. RESULTS: VEGF_(165) eukaryotic expression vector was successfully constructed, confirmed by enzyme digestion and sequencing. Compared with the K562 cells transfected pEGFP-C1, the K562 cells transfected with pEGFP-C1-hVEGF_(165) grew faster and expressions of VEGF mRNA and protein increased significantly. In addition, K562 cells transfected with pEGFP-C1-hVEGF_(165) had relatively higher cell survival rate to chemotherapy drugs homoharringtonine(HHT) and fluorouracil(FU). CONCLUSION: VEGF_(165) eukaryotic expression vector increases the level of VEGF mRNA and protein expression, accordingly promotes the proliferation of leukemia cells and decreases the sensitivity of leukemia cells to HHT and FU.

OBJECTIVE To suvey the mastering of knowledge on prevention and treatment of AIDS among medical staff and evaluate the effect of health education on them.METHODS Suvey among medical staff was performed by self-designed questionnaires before and after education,then evaluated the effect of health education.RESULTS The mean score before education was 20.12?2.28;The mean score after education was 20.77?4.04.There were significant differences between them(t=6.417,P

Objective To compare the clinical effect of two different kinds of wound dressing on postoperative skin reactions and phlebitis for PICC in critical patients. Methods A total of 313 PICC critical patients were divided into control group (157 cases) and treatment group (156 cases) by random digits table method. After PICC, the control group was attached to transparent dressing, the experimental group was attached to Mepilex, all of the patients were received routine nursing. The incidences of adverse effect, and the degree of local skin pruritus by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) were compared in two weeks. Results The incidence of skin allergy, infection, and mechanical phlebitis were 24.20%(38/157), 10.83%(17/157), 18.47%(29/157) in control group and 7.69%(12/156),4.49%(7/156), 3.21%(5/156) in treatment group, and there were significant differences between two groups (χ2=13.99, 4.44, 18.83, P<0.01 or<0.05). The score of VAS in control group and treatment group were (4.84±1.29) points and (3.15± 1.82) points respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (t=8.66, P<0.01). Conclusions Application of Mepilex for PICC in critical patients can decrease the incidences of adverse effect, and increase the degree of comfort. It is worth utilizing widely in the clinic.

OBJECTIVE:To study the development and status quo of narcotics and psychotropic substances (NPS) in China since 1949,and to provide evidence for perfection of NPS control work in China. METHODS:The development and status quo of controlled substances control by China since 1949 were summarized and analyzed through retrieving and collecting literatures,re-ports and policies about NPS from domestic and foreign databases,news reports and related website. RESULTS & CONCLU-SIONS:Chinese narcotics and psychotropic substances control dated back to the release of Interim Regulations on Narcotics Con-trol in 1950 and Regulations on Narcotics Control,Drug Administration Law and other regulations have been issued. It had experi-enced the progress from no legal basis to having laws to follow and from executive-leading to legalization. Narcotics and psychotro-pic substances were gradually unified in systematic control,and the level of regulations rised from department rules to administra-tion regulation. At present,with Regulations on Narcotics and Psychotropic Drugs Control (2005) as regulatory basis and cata-logue of narcotics and psychotropic substances(2013)as object,China Food and Drug Administration are in charge of the national regulation,cooperating with health department,agricultural department,traffic department and other departments.

OBJECTIVE:To study the development and status quo of controlled drugs control in Britain,and to provide evi-dence for narcotics and psychotropic substances(NPS)control in China. METHODS:The development and status quo of NPS con-trol by Britain were summarized and studied through retrieving and collecting literatures,reports and policies about NPS from do-mestic and foreign databases,news reports and international website. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS:British control for controlled drugs dated back to Pharmacy Act in 1868,and Britain was the first country to control drugs by legislations. A unique British sys-tem of narcotics control was established and improved after issued Rolleston Report and two pieces of Brain Report in Britain. Final-ly,the British system of narcotics control was established,which combined public health prevention with judicial redress. At pres-ent,controlled drugs are classified and controlled by Advisory Committee on Drug Abuse,Serious Organised Crime Agency and National Drug Abuse Treatment Agency subordinated to Ministry of Interior,based on Misuse of Drugs Act.

OBJECTIVE:To study the development and status quo of controlled substances control in the United States,and to provide evidence for narcotics and psychotropic substances (NPS) control in China. METHODS:The development and status quo of controlled substances control by the United States were summarized and studies through retrieving and collecting literatures,re-ports and policies about NPS from domestic and foreign databases,news reports and international website. RESULTS & CONCLU-SIONS:The United States'control for controlled substances dated back to Harrison Narcotics Tax Act in 1914,and the United States is the first nation to control narcotics addiction through the form of tax law after International Opium Convention is executed. Thereafter,the United States gradually extend the range by including cannabis,heroin and psychotropic substances into control range of Narcotics Drugs Import and Export Act,Heroin Act,Marijuana Tax Act,revising and developing comprehensive act Con-trolled Substances Act,and establishing comprehensive law enforcement agency Controlled Substances Enforcement Administration affiliated to Ministry of Justice by Nixon'sWar on Drugsplan.

OBJECTIVE:To study the development and status quo of international narcotics and psychotropic substances (NPS)control,and to provide evidence for NPS control in China. METHODS:The development and status quo of NPS control by international organization were summarized and studied through retrieving and collecting literatures,reports and policies about NPS from domestic and foreign databases,news reports and international website. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS:International narcot-ics control dated back to opium trade with China in 19th century. International narcotics control system was established preliminarily by Shanghai conference and Haiya conference. The end of World War Ⅰ,the establishment of the League of Nations and the sign-ing of a number of international treaties promoted the development of internal control system. Through World War Ⅱ,the establish-ment of the United Nations and the change of international control organization,a number of international treaties were integrated into Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs in the early 1960s,which was used as the foundation of narcotics control system all round the world. In 1970s,the adoption of Convention on Psychotropic Substances meant psychotropic substances were included in the scope of internal control. In 1980s,the signing of United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psy-chotropic Substances marked the establishment of three conventions system of international NPS control. At present,internal NPS control is based on three conventions system and NPS list by Commission on Narcotic Drugs,International Narcotics Control Board and United Nations International Drug Control Program. The vast majority of countries are parties to that. International control orga-nizations and listed control have a great influence on NPS control all round the world.

OBJECTIVE:To make proposals to improve narcotics and psychotropic substances(NPS)control in China. METH-ODS:NPS control system of international organizations,the United States,Britain and China were compared in terms of concept, classification,regulatory basis and agency,etc. The suggestions and reference were put forward. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS:NPS of international organizations,the United States,Britain and China are drug types included in relevant categories,besides ana-leptics,precursor chemicals and other drugs are included in control catalogue by the United States and Britain. NPS are divided in-toⅠ-Ⅳcategories by international organizations,Ⅰ-Ⅴcategories by the United States,A,B,C categories and temporary catego-ry by Britain,and narcotics,first and second class psychotropic substances by China. NPS control basis of the United States,Brit-ain and China are Controlled Substances Act,Misuse of Drugs Act and Regulations on Narcotics and Psychotropic Drugs Control, respectively;major regulation organizations are Controlled Substances Enforcement Administration,Advisory Committee on Drug Abuse subordinated to Ministry of Interior,Special Drug Section under China Food and Drug Administration,respectively;there al-so are differences in the functions of control organization and cooperative units. Considering about the problems of NPS control in China,it is suggested to improve laws and regulations system,establish independent system,extend abuse surveillance network and encourage chronic non-cancer pain therapy.