Y chromosome microdeletions are an important cause of male infertility. At present, research on the Y chromosome is mainly focused on analyzing the loss of large segments of the azoospermia factor a/b/c (AZFa/b/c) gene, and few studies have reported the impact of unit point deletion in the AZF band on fertility. This study analyzed the effect of sperm quality after sY1192 loss in 116 patients. The sY1192-independent deletion accounted for 41.4% (48/116). Eight patterns were found in the deletions associated with sY1192. The rate of sperm detection was similar in the semen of patients with the independent sY1192 deletion and the combined sY1192 deletions (52.1% vs 50.0%). The patients with only sY1192 gene loss had a higher probability of sperm detection than the patients whose sY1192 gene locus existed, but other gene loci were lost (52.1% vs 32.0%). The hormone levels were similar in patients with sY1192 deletion alone and in those with sY1192 deletion and other types of microdeletions in the presence of the sY1192 locus. After multiple intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) attempts, the pregnancy rate of spouses of men with sY1192-independent deletions was similar to that of other types of microdeletions, but the fertilization and cleavage rates were higher. We observed that eight deletion patterns were observed for sY1192 microdeletions of AZFb/c, dominated by the independent deletion of sY1192. After ICSI, the fertilization rate and cleavage rate of the sY1192-independent microdeletion were higher than those of other Y chromosome microdeletion types, but there was no significant difference in pregnancy outcomes.
Humans ; Female ; Pregnancy ; Male ; Chromosomes, Human, Y/genetics* ; Adult ; Chromosome Deletion ; Pregnancy Outcome/genetics* ; Infertility, Male/genetics* ; Spermatozoa/physiology* ; Semen Analysis ; Sex Chromosome Disorders of Sex Development/genetics* ; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic ; Azoospermia/genetics* ; Sex Chromosome Aberrations

This article reports a child with cardioaciocutaneous syndrome (CFCS) caused by a rare microdeletion of chromosome 19p13.3, and a literature review is conducted. The child had unusual facies, short stature, delayed mental and motor development, macrocephaly, and cardiac abnormalities. Whole-exome sequencing identified a 1 040 kb heterozygous deletion in the 19p13.3 region of the child, which was rated as a "pathogenic variant". This is the first case of CFCS caused by a loss-of-function mutation reported in China, which enriches the genotype characteristics of CFCS. It is imperative to enhance the understanding of CFCS in children. Early identification based on its clinical manifestations should be pursued, and genetic testing should be performed to facilitate diagnosis.
Humans ; Chromosome Deletion ; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 19/genetics* ; Ectodermal Dysplasia/genetics* ; Facies ; Failure to Thrive/genetics* ; Heart Defects, Congenital/genetics*

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of Y chromosome AZFc microdeletion on pregnancy outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). METHODS: From 2016 to 2023, 6 765 cases of oligozoospermia in our hospital were selected as the research objects. The results of Y chromosome microdeletion test were retrospectively analyzed. According to the inclusion exclusion criteria and the principle of propensity distribution 1∶2, 180 patients were included in the study. Sixty patients with Y chromosome AZFc microdeletion and ICSI assisted pregnancy were enrolled into the experimental group. The other 120 patients without Y chromosome microdeletion and ICSI assisted pregnancy were included in the control group. Baseline characteristics, five male sex hormones, laboratory embryo culture and pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in male age, female age, infertility years, gravidity and parity between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the five sex hormones of men (P>0.05). Except for transplantable embryos (P<0.05), there was no significant difference in other indicators in the process of embryo culture. There was no difference in pregnancy outcome indicators between the two groups except for the preterm birth rate (P<0.05). CONCLUSION ICSI assisted pregnancy with Y chromosome AZFc microdeletion has no significant effect on pregnancy outcome. And close follow-up of offspring is required.
Humans ; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic ; Pregnancy ; Female ; Chromosomes, Human, Y ; Male ; Chromosome Deletion ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Retrospective Studies ; Sex Chromosome Disorders of Sex Development ; Sex Chromosome Aberrations ; Adult ; Infertility, Male/genetics* ; Oligospermia/genetics* ; Pregnancy Rate

BACKGROUND

Turner syndrome (TS) is the most common sex chromosomal abnormality in females resulting from a missing X chromosomal material. This in turn results in a range of clinical manifestations. This study aimed to provide the data on the cases of TS confirmed via chromosomal analysis in a cytogenetics laboratory in the Philippines as well as the role of genetic counseling.

A review of the karyotyping results of the Cytogenetics Laboratory, Institute of Human Genetics, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippine Manila from 1991 to 2020.

TS accounted for 2.64% of all the samples received from 1991 to 2020. For 30 years, the most common karyotype in TS was the classical TS or the standard monosomy 45, X noted in 195 patients or 37.69% of all patients diagnosed with TS. Mosaicism with a normal female karyotype was noted in 50 patients (9.62%). For the TS variants, the most common is isochromosome Xq seen in 125 patients (24.04%). This is followed by TS with marker chromosome in 55 patients (10.58%) and ring X chromosome in 23 patients (4.42%). Deletion Xp and deletion Xq were noted in 22 patients (4.23%) and 20 patients (3.85%), respectively.

From this study, it can be noted that chromosomal analysis or standard karyotyping is a vital and useful diagnostic tool in TS. The information obtained from it may be useful in clinical decision-making of families and healthcare providers. Its importance in providing adequate genetic counseling cannot be overemphasized.

Chromosome karyotyping is a critical way to diagnose various hematological malignancies and genetic diseases, of which chromosome detection in raw metaphase cell images is the most critical and challenging step. In this work, focusing on the joint optimization of chromosome localization and classification, we propose ChromTR to accurately detect and classify 24 classes of chromosomes in raw metaphase cell images. ChromTR incorporates semantic feature learning and class distribution learning into a unified DETR-based detection framework. Specifically, we first propose a Semantic Feature Learning Network (SFLN) for semantic feature extraction and chromosome foreground region segmentation with object-wise supervision. Next, we construct a Semantic-Aware Transformer (SAT) with two parallel encoders and a Semantic-Aware decoder to integrate global visual and semantic features. To provide a prediction with a precise chromosome number and category distribution, a Category Distribution Reasoning Module (CDRM) is built for foreground-background objects and chromosome class distribution reasoning. We evaluate ChromTR on 1404 newly collected R-band metaphase images and the public G-band dataset AutoKary2022. Our proposed ChromTR outperforms all previous chromosome detection methods with an average precision of 92.56% in R-band chromosome detection, surpassing the baseline method by 3.02%. In a clinical test, ChromTR is also confident in tackling normal and numerically abnormal karyotypes. When extended to the chromosome enumeration task, ChromTR also demonstrates state-of-the-art performances on R-band and G-band two metaphase image datasets. Given these superior performances to other methods, our proposed method has been applied to assist clinical karyotype diagnosis.
Humans ; Metaphase ; Karyotyping/methods* ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods* ; Algorithms ; Chromosomes, Human/genetics*

The probiotic strain Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 (EcN) with high biocompatibility and susceptibility to genetic modification is often applied in bacterial therapies for cancer. However, most studies have used plasmids as vectors to construct engineering strains from EcN. Plasmid-based expression systems suffer from genetic instability, and they need antibiotic selective pressure to maintain high copy number. This study aimed to employ EcN for synthesizing the photosensitizer 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA). Firstly, the key genes of 5-ALA synthesis, hemA^M and hemL, were integrated into the EcN genome by the phage integration technique. Then, chemically inducible chromosomal evolution (CIChE) was adopted to increase the copy number of hemA^M and hemL and thus improved the stable synthesis of 5-ALA. The in vitro cell experiments verified that the constructed engineering strain can deliver stably synthesized 5-ALA to tumor cells and inhibit their growth. This study provided a basis for applying the engineering strains of EcN in the photodynamic therapy for tumors.
Escherichia coli/metabolism* ; Aminolevulinic Acid/metabolism* ; Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacology* ; Plasmids/genetics* ; Chromosomes, Bacterial/genetics* ; Genetic Engineering ; Humans ; Probiotics ; Photochemotherapy

Humans ; Staphylococcus lugdunensis/genetics* ; Peptides, Cyclic ; Chromosomes ; Operon/genetics* ; Staphylococcal Infections/genetics* ; Bacterial Proteins/genetics* ; Anti-Bacterial Agents

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the prognosis of fetuses identified with de novo variants of unknown significance (VOUS) by chromosome microarray analysis (CMA). METHODS: A total of 6 826 fetuses who underwent prenatal CMA detection at the Prenatal Diagnosis Center of Drum Tower Hospital from July 2017 to December 2021 were selected as the study subjects. The results of prenatal diagnosis, and outcome of fetuses identified with VOUS of de novo origin were followed up. RESULTS: Among the 6 826 fetuses, 506 have carried VOUS, of which 237 were detected for the parent-of-origin and 24 were found to be de novo. Among the latters, 20 were followed up for 4 to 24 months. Four couples had opted elective abortion, 4 had developed clinical phenotypes after birth, and 12 were normal. CONCLUSION Fetuses with VOUS should be continuously follow-up, in particular those carrying de novo VOUS, in order to clarify their clinical significance.
Pregnancy ; Female ; Humans ; DNA Copy Number Variations ; Follow-Up Studies ; Prenatal Diagnosis/methods* ; Chromosomes ; Microarray Analysis/methods* ; Fetus ; Chromosome Aberrations

OBJECTIVE: To provide prenatal diagnosis, pedigree analysis and genetic counseling for a pregnant woman who had given birth to a child featuring global developmental delay. METHODS: A pregnant woman who underwent prenatal diagnosis at the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University in August 2021 was selected as the study subject. Peripheral blood samples were collected from the woman, her husband and child, in addition with amniotic fluid sample during mid-pregnancy. Genetic variants were detected by G-banded karyotyping analysis and copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq). Pathogenicity of the variant was predicted based on the guidelines from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Candidate variant was traced in the pedigree to assess the recurrence risk. RESULTS: The karyotypes of the pregnant woman, her fetus, and affected child were 46,XX,ins(18)(p11.2q21q22), 46,X?,rec(18)dup(18)(q21q22)ins(18)(p11.2q21q22)mat and 46,XY,rec(18)del(18)(q21q22)ins(18)(p11.2q21q22)mat, respectively. Her husband was found to have a normal karyotype. CNV-seq has revealed a 19.73 Mb duplication at 18q21.2-q22.3 in the fetus and a 19.77 Mb deletion at 18q21.2-q22.3 in her child. The duplication and deletion fragments were identical to the insertional fragment in the pregnant woman. Based on the ACMG guidelines, the duplication and deletion fragments were both predicted to be pathogenic. CONCLUSION The intrachromosomal insertion of 18q21.2-q22.3 carried by the pregnant woman had probably given rise to the 18q21.2-q22.3 duplication and deletion in the two offspring. Above finding has provided a basis for genetic counseling for this pedigree.
Child ; Female ; Humans ; Pregnancy ; DNA Copy Number Variations ; East Asian People ; Pedigree ; Prenatal Diagnosis/methods* ; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 18/genetics* ; Male ; Fetus ; INDEL Mutation

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal mosaicisms. METHODS: A total of 775 pregnant women who had visited the Prenatal Diagnosis Center of Yancheng Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital from January 2018 to December 2020 were selected as study subjects. Chromosome karyotyping analysis and CMA were carried out for all women, and FISH was used to validate the suspected mosaicism cases. RESULTS: Among the 775 amniotic fluid samples, karyotyping has identified 13 mosaicism cases, which yielded a detection rate of 1.55%. Respectively, there were 4, 3, 4 and 2 cases for sex chromosome number mosaicisms, abnormal sex chromosome structure mosaicisms, abnormal autosomal number mosaicisms and abnormal autosomal structure mosaicisms. CMA has only detected only 6 of the 13 cases. Among 3 cases verified by FISH, 2 cases were consistent with the karyotyping and CMA results, and clearly showed low proportion mosaicism, and 1 case was consistent with the result of karyotyping but with a normal result by CMA. Eight pregnant women had chosen to terminate the pregnancy (5 with sex chromosome mosaicisms and 3 with autosomal mosaicisms). CONCLUSION For fetuses suspected for chromosomal mosaicisms, CMA, FISH and G-banding karyotyping should be combined to determine the type and proportion of mosaicisms more precisely in order to provide more information for genetic counseling.
Female ; Pregnancy ; Humans ; Mosaicism ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; Chromosome Disorders/genetics* ; Prenatal Diagnosis/methods* ; Chromosome Aberrations ; Sex Chromosome Aberrations ; Microarray Analysis/methods* ; Chromosomes