This study is designed to clarify the effects of increases in a rehabilitation session on the functional outcome of hip fractures in the subacute phase.　　Of 95 patients with hip fractures admitted to our subacute care ward between November 2010 and March 2012, five patients transferred to another ward due to complications were excluded, and 90 patients were taken up. The 90 patients were divided into two groups: 22 patients who underwent rehabilitation before an increase in the frequency of rehabilitation sessions (early-phase group) and 68 who underwent rehabilitation after an increase in the frequency (later-phase group). Outcomes, such as the number of rehabilitation sessions, length of hospital stay, FIM at the time of discharge, FIM efficiency and destination after hospital discharge, were compared between the two groups.　　In a comparison of all patients, the number of rehabilitation sessions significantly increased (p<0.001), but there was no significant difference in FIM at the time of discharge from hospital, FIM efficiency and post-discharge destination. Group “Rank A” stood out in a comparison of the degree of independence enjoyed by the disabled elderly in their daily life before they suffered injuries (p<0.05). Group “Rank I” stood out in a comparison of the degree of independence in the daily life by the elderly with dementia, while they were in hospital (p⁢0.05). The FIM efficiency of the later-phase group was significantly higher than that of the early-phase group.　　It is presumably effective to begin intensive rehabilitation for patients whose ADL ability is somewhat reduced and those who have cognitive impairments. It has been thought that cognitive impairment was one of the factors that inhibit rehabilitation for hip fractures. However, it has been suggested that improvements in ADL are possible with increases in rehabilitation sessions for cases with mild cognitive impairment.

　　The purpose of this study was to clarify the effectiveness the score of the family’s ability to care to determine the discharge destination in patients with hip fractures.　　The subjects were 73 patients with hip fractures, who were admitted to the subacute care ward. They were classified into two groups: 48 patients who were discharged to home and 25, who were transferred to some other hospital or nursing home. 　　The following parameters were compared between the two groups: sex, age, preinjury level of independence in daily living for the disabled elderly, level of independence in daily living for the demented elderly during hospitalization, FIM (Functional Independence Measure) at the time of discharge from hospital, number of family caregivers, familial care ability score, and length of hospitalization. The parameters presenting significant differences were used as independent variables in multiple logistic regression analysis, with discharge outcome as the dependent variable.　　The parameters presenting significant differences between the two groups were “FIM at hospital discharge” and “familial care ability score”. In addition, multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that “FIM at hospital discharge” and “familial care ability score” were significantly related to discharge outcome. Results of receiver operating characteristic analysis (area under the curve) for &ldqup;FIM at hospital discharge,” “familial care ability score,” and “FIM at hospital discharge＋familial care ability score” were 0.763, 0.681, and 0.786, respectively. Furthermore, the area under the curve for “FIM at discharge＋familial care ability score” was higher compared with those for the other parameters.　　Thus, we demonstrated that familial care ability score was effective in determining the discharge destination in patients with hip fractures.