1.Study on Risk Factors Related with Chronic Stuttering for 2~10 Years Old Children
Chunyang LIU ; Aimin LIANG ; Ruiyun SHEN ; Zhuang WEI ; Ke CHEN ; Yanmei XING ; Chenying ZHANG
Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice 2007;13(6):558-560
Objective To investigate the risk factors related with chronic stuttering of children lasting more than 6 months.MethodsThe data of 109 children of 2~10 years old with chronic stuttering lasting more than 6 months and 68 children with developmental stuttering lasting less than 6 months were analyzed.ResultsThe minor symptom and escape behavior in the stuttering children group were significantly more than children in the control group. The risk factors related with chronic stuttering showed by Logistic regression analysis were as follows: care about their stuttering, not professional advice and training, the attitude of parents on stuttering, family history, incorrect rectifying methods, few family members, improper family bring-up environment.ConclusionChildren with minor symptom and escape behavior concurrent with stuttering, care about their stuttering and with family record, are susceptible to chronic stuttering. Following factors are found important to chronic stuttering: professional advice and training, the attitude of parents to stuttering, methods of parents correcting stuttering, number of family members, bring-up environment of family.
2.Advances in immunotherapy for recurrent and metastatic cervical cancer
Lu ZHANG ; Juying ZHOU ; Chenying MA ; Zhou LIN
Journal of International Oncology 2022;49(9):517-520
Immunotherapy mainly includes simple immunotherapy (immune checkpoint inhibitor, therapeutic human papillomavirus vaccine, adoptive T cell therapy, double immunotherapy, etc.) , immunotherapy combined with other treatments (such as chemotherapy, antiangiogenic therapy, radiotherapy, etc.) . The continuous development of immunotherapy and the improvement of treatment scheme have improved the survival and prognosis of patients, and provided new ideas for the diagnosis and treatment of recurrent and metastatic cervical cancer.
3.Analysis of curative effect and prognosis of immune checkpoint inhibitor in the treatment of recurrent and metastatic cervical cancer
Lu ZHANG ; Hua JIANG ; Zhou LIN ; Chenying MA ; Xiaoting XU ; Lili WANG ; Juying ZHOU
Journal of International Oncology 2023;50(8):475-483
Objective:To analyze the efficacy, safety and prognostic factors of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of recurrent and metastatic cervical cancer.Methods:A total of 87 patients with recurrent and metastatic cervical cancer admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from January 2018 to June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into non immunotherapy group ( n=32) and immunotherapy group ( n=55) according to whether immune checkpoint inhibition was applied after recurrence and metastasis. The disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival 1 (OS1, date of pathology diagnosis to the end of follow-up or time of death), overall survival 2 (OS2, time of first immunotherapy/non-immunotherapy to the end of follow-up or time of death), safety and prognostic factors of the two groups were analyzed and compared. Results:In 87 patients with recurrent and metastatic cervical cancer, the DCR of the non immunotherapy group and immunotherapy group were 53.1% (17/32) and 72.7% (40/55) respectively ( χ2=3.44, P=0.064). The median OS1 of the non immunotherapy group was 51.0 months, while the immunotherapy group did not reach the median OS1, with a statistically significant difference ( χ2=7.50, P=0.006). The median OS2 of the non immunotherapy group was 28.0 months, while the immunotherapy group did not reach the median OS2, with a statistically significant difference ( χ2=7.07, P=0.008). The median PFS of the non immunotherapy group and immunotherapy group were 18.0 months and 23.0 months respectively, with no significant difference ( χ2=0.01, P=0.915). In the immunotherapy group, 70.9% (39/55) of patients received immune checkpoint inhibitors as first-line treatment and 29.1% (16/55) received as second-line and above treatment. Both groups of patients did not achieve median OS2, with median PFS of 23.0 and 17.0 months respectively, and there were no statistically significant differences ( χ2=0.94, P=0.333; χ2=2.00, P=0.158) ; 38.2% (21/55) of patients received immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with local radiotherapy, 61.8% (34/55) patients did not receive radiotherapy. And neither group of patients achieved median OS2, with median PFS of 19.0 and 25.0 months respectively, with no statistically significant differences ( χ2=0.62, P=0.432; χ2=0.01, P=0.906). The incidences of grade 1-2 hematuria and hypothyroidism in the non immunotherapy group and immunotherapy group were 53.1% (17/32) vs. 27.3% (15/55, χ2=5.82, P=0.016), 3.1% (1/32) vs. 21.8% (12/55, χ2=4.19, P=0.041) respectively. The incidence of myelosuppression in the non immunotherapy group [grade 1-2: 59.4% (19/32), grade 3-4: 34.4% (11/32) ] was significantly different from that in the immunotherapy group [grade 1-2: 80.0% (44/55), grade 3-4: 3.6% (2/55) ; Z=3.50, P<0.001]. There were no statistically significant differences between creatinine increase, glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase and glutamic-pyruvic transaminase increase, lymphocyte decrease, hypoproteinemia, proteinuria, rash, fatigue (all P>0.05). Univariate regression analysis showed that the use of immune checkpoint inhibitor was an independent protective factor affecting the prognosis of patients ( HR=0.31, 95% CI: 0.12-0.77, P=0.012) . Conclusion:Whether used as first-line or second-line or above treatment, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with recurrent and metastatic cervical cancer prolongs their OS1, OS2, and has good safety. The application of immune checkpoint inhibitors is an independent protective factor affecting the prognosis of patients.
4.The value of tumor blood supply characteristics of arterial phase in evaluating the prognosis of patients with intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma
Bingrong LI ; Kun ZHANG ; Liuxiao ZHOU ; Liyan LEI ; Xuemiao ZHAO ; Xihui YING ; Chenying LU ; Yangrui XIAO ; Xiao CHEN ; Jiansong JI ; Zhongwei ZHAO ; Xinmu ZHOU
Chinese Journal of Radiology 2020;54(6):563-567
Objective:To investigate the correlation between the enhancement characteristics in arterial phase and the prognosis of patients with massive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC).Methods:The imaging and clinical data of 92 patients with IMCC who were pathologically confirmed and underwent enhanced MRI or CT in Central Hospital of Lishui from June 2004 to February 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the enhancement pattern of the primary lesion in the arterial phase, patients were divided into rich arterial blood supply group (17 cases) and deficient arterial blood supply group (75 cases). The clinical data and imaging features of these patients were studied. Differences between measurement data and count data between the two groups were compared using t test and Fisher test. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to analyze overall survival. The Cox regression multivariate analysis was used to study the relationship between the variables and the risk of death. Result:The enlargement of lymph nodes, long diameter of the primary lesion, CA19-9, treatment and HPD around the primary lesion in arterial phase were statistically different in the two groups ( P<0.05), others were no statistical difference. CA19-9>200 U/ml, lymph node enlargement, HPD around the primary lesion in arterial phase and deficient arterial blood supply were independent factors for the prediction of prognosis in IMCC patients with surgery ( P values were 0.008, 0.002, 0.049 and 0.005, respectively). Lymph node enlargement and deficient arterial blood supply were independent risk factors for the prediction of prognosis in IMCC patients with surgery ( P values are 0.049 and 0.045, respectively). Conclusion:The blood supply characteristics of arterial phase are independent factors for the prognosis of patients with IMCC.
5.Autologous blood transfusion drainage and simple drainage after lumbar surgery: A comparative study
Qiaomei YUAN ; Yusong JIA ; Jinyu LI ; Chenying ZHENG ; Chunxiao BAI ; Fan ZHANG ; Xueshi DI ; Shengqian KANG ; Shuiwen LONG ; Jiang CHEN
Chinese Journal of Blood Transfusion 2021;34(3):245-248
【Objective】 To investigate the effect of autologous blood transfusion(ABT) drainage system and simple drainage(using drainage bags) on the prognosis of patients after lumbar surgery. 【Methods】 The patients admitted to the Department of Orthopedics of our hospital from August 2018 to September 2020 who underwent posterior open lumbar internal fixation and fusion were divided into two groups according to different drainage methods adopted after surgery: 50 patients were randomly selected from the patients who received postoperative ABT system for drainage as ABT group, and 50 patients were randomly selected from the patients who received postoperative drainage by drainage bag as simple drainage bgroup(the control group). The postoperative drainage volume, actual postoperative drainage, total dominant blood loss, total autologous blood transfusion volume, as well as the postoperative anemia indexes, infection indexes and albumin levels in d1, d3 and d7 of the 2 groups were retrospectively analyzed. 【Results】 The gender, age, operation duration and operation segment of the 2 groups were comparable (P>0.05), and preoperative Hb, Hct, ALB, WBC, NE%, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative autologous blood transfusion volume and actual postoperative drainage volume were similar (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in Hb, Hct, ALB, WBC, NE% and CRP in postoperative d1, d3 and d7, as well as in preoperative and postoperative Hb, Hct and ALB, and in postoperative and preoperative WBC, NE% and CRP (P>0.05). The postoperative drainage volume (mL) and total dominant blood loss (mL) in ABT group and the control group were 554.40±176.82 vs 337.80±102.43, and 1 048.40±282.87 vs 791.80±277.02, respectively (P<0.05). 【Conclusion】 The use of ABT drainage system after lumbar surgery increased the drainage volume compared with simple drainage, but the improvement of anemia, albumin and infection was not obvious. ABT system should not be used routinely for drainage after lumbar surgery.