1.The target/no target ratio analysis of 18F-FDG uptaking in head and neck malignancy by SPECT/CT coincidence imaging
Nan LI ; Xibao MAO ; Chenmin DING ; Wenjun BAO ; Jing FAN ; Ningjuan XUE
Tianjin Medical Journal 2016;44(1):98-101
Objective To investigate the influencing factors of 18F-FDG uptaking in head and neck malignancy by SPECT/CT coincidence imaging. Methods 18F-FDG SPECT/CT coincidence imaging was performed in 32 patients with head and neck malignancy after surgery, radiotherapy or radiotherapy + chemotherapy. The radio of target/no target (T/N) was calculated. The gender, age, fasting blood glucose level, size of tumor, location of tumor, pathological classification, de-gree of cell differentiation and treatment modalities were analyzed between groups. Results The single-factor analysis of variance showed that the T/N value was significantly higher in >70 yeas old, group than that of 41-50 yeas old group and 51-60 yeas old group (P<0.05). The T/N value was significantly lower in tumor size<2 cm group than that of 2-5 cm group and>5 cm group (P<0.05). And it was lower in poor differentiated tumor group than that of. undifferentiated tumor group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in T/N values between other indicator groups (P>0.05). The multiple linear regression analysis showed that 18F-FDG uptaking in head and neck malignancy (T/N=Y) was related to the age of patients (X2), the diameter of tumor (X4) and the degree of cell differentiation (X9): =-4.389 25+0.053 03 X2+1.617 86 X4+0.718 35 X9. Conclusion Tumor recurrence is more likely to occur in patients with age>70 years old, the diameter of tumor≥2 cm, and the anaplastic head and neck malignancy.We should pay much attention to the diagnosis and follow-up for these pa-tients.
2.Value of99mTcO4- and99mTc-MIBI imaging with ultrasound scoring method in diagnosis of thyroid nodules
Nan LI ; Xibao MAO ; Ningjuan XUE ; Lingyun JIANG ; Wenjun BAO ; Chenmin DING ; Jing FAN
China Oncology 2016;26(5):434-440
Background and purpose:At present, color Doppler ultrasound scoring and radionuclide imaging are two important imaging methods for diagnosing thyroid nodules, but their checking principle is different. Which method is better? Or combining them will be the best method for diagnosing thyroid nodules? This study aimed to compare the value of99mTcO4- combined with99mTc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile (MIBI) imaging, ultrasound scoring method and ultrasound scoring method+99mTcO4-+99mTc-MIBI imaging in diagnosis of thyroid nodules.Methods:The results of ultrasound scoring method and99mTcO4- combined with99mTc-MIBI imaging were compared in 50 patients with 54 thyroid nodules, and then compared with pathological findings. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the methods were calculated.Results:A total of 54 thyroid nodules were found pathologically including 20 malignant and 34 benign nodules. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV of99mTcO4- combined with99mTc-MIBI imaging were 80.00% (16/20), 70.59% (24/34), 74.07% (40/54), 61.54% (16/26), 85.71% (24/28), re-spectively. Those of ultrasound scoring method were 80.00% (16/20), 88.24% (30/34), 85.16% (46/54), 80.00% (16/20), 88.24% (30/34), respectively. And those of ultrasound scoring method+99mTcO4-+99mTc-MIBI imaging were 100.00% (20/20), 64.71% (22/34), 77.78% (42/54), 62.50% (20/32), 100.00% (22/22), respectively. The sensitivity of ultrasound scoring method+99mTcO4-+99mTc-MIBI imaging was higher than ultrasound scoring method or99mTcO4-+99mTc-MIBI imaging along (100.00%vs 80.00%, 100.00%vs 80.00%,χ2 value was 4.444 4 and 4.444 4,P value was 0.035 0 and 0.035 0, respectively). The specificity of ultrasound scoring method was higher than those of two methods combined together (88.24%vs 64.71%,χ2 value was 5.230 8,P value was 0.022 2). However, no factorial negative thyroid nodule was found by ul-trasound scoring method+99mTcO4-+99mTc-MIBI imaging.Conclusion:Ultrasound scoring method+99mTcO4-+99mTc-MIBI imaging can offer comprehensive diagnosis of thyroid nodules from their structure and function to avoid missed diagnosis.
3.Differences of clinical characteristics between temporal lobe epilepsy with bilateral hippocampal sclerosis and temporal lobe epilepsy with unilateral hippocampal sclerosis
Qi TAO ; Chenmin HE ; Jingjing QIU ; Yuyu YANG ; Sha XU ; Yi GUO ; Hong LI ; Yao DING ; Meiping DING ; Shuang WANG
Chinese Journal of Neuromedicine 2024;23(5):450-457
Objective:To compare the differences of clinical characteristics of temporal lobe epilepsy with bilateral hippocampal sclerosis (TLE-bHS) with those of temporal lobe epilepsy with unilateral hippocampal sclerosis (TLE-uHS).Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed. Forty-eight patients with confirmed TLE-bHS enrolled in Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Medical School of Zhejiang University from January 2013 to January 2022 were chosen, and 101 patients with confirmed TLE-uHS admitted to our hospital at the same time period were selected as controls. Clinical data such as onset age, disease course, past medical history, seizure frequency, anti-seizure medications, video EEG and neuropsychological test results, and outcomes were analyzed.Results:Compared with the TLE-uHS group, the TLE-bHS group had higher male proportion, elder onset age, shorter disease course, higher seizure frequency, more types of past and currently used anti-seizure medications, lower proportion of autonomic nerve with aura, higher proportion of no aura at onset, higher proportion of slow head background movement in video EEG, and lower memory quotient, verbal memory scores and non-verbal memory scores, with significant differences ( P<0.05); the differences in ratio of past medical history and ratio of distributions of regions with interictal epileptiform abnormalities between the 2 groups were statistically significant ( P<0.05): the TLE-bHS group had significantly higher proportion of previous intracranial infection/encephalitis and higher ratio of bilateral temporal epileptiform abnormalities than the TLE-uHS group, while the TLE-uHS group had significantly higher proportion of patients with febrile convulsion history and higher ratio of unilateral temporal epileptiform abnormalities ( P<0.05). Only 10 patients (20.8%) in the TLE-bHS group received non-drug therapy, including anterior temporal lobectomy in 3 patients (Engel grading I in postoperative follow-up for 2 years), neuroregulatory therapy in 4, and ketogenic diet in 4; of the 55 patients (54.5%) in the TLE-uHS group who underwent anterior temporal lobectomy, 48 patients (87.3%) had Engel grading I, 1 patient (1.8%) had grading II, 4 (7.3%) had grading III, and 2 (3.6%) had grading IV after 2 years of follow-up. Conclusion:Differences in onset age, disease course, past medical history, seizure frequency, anti-seizure medications, and video EEG and neuropsychological test results can help to discriminate patients with TLE-bHS or with TLE-uHS.