1.The Initial Diagnosis and Treatment of Open Fracture of Tibia With A 124-case Report
Yaoqing PENG ; Chaoyao ZHANG ; Xiaoru LI
Journal of Chinese Physician 2001;0(10):-
0 05); the infection rate of deep wound Ⅲ degree was the lowest in delayed wound closing group. Conclusions It is key to improve the quality of the initial diagnosis and treatment,its measures are effective early stage debridement, the use of antibiotic, reasonable wound closing ,drainage,fixation, primary bone graft,bone plantation at phase Ⅰ and rigid selection of amputation; interlocking medullary nailing and external fixation stand with limited internal fixation are effective methods for the fixation of open fracture of tibia in the initial diagnosis and treatment.
2.Comparison of three kinds common methods in detection of hepatitis B
Yunzhou LIU ; Weihong HU ; Wei ZHANG ; Chaoyao WANG ; Jianye LI
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine 2012;35(7):22-26
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical application value of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and time-resolved fluorescence analysis(TRFIA) and latex immune chromatography (GICA) in detecting hepatitis B serum markers.MethodsOne hundred and forty-five suspected patients of hepatitis B were detected serum markers of hepatitis B by ELISA,TRFIA and GICA method,and the results were compared and analyzed.ResultsWhen TRFIA method was as gold standard,the positive coincidence rate of ELISA and GICA method in HBsAg,HBeAb,HBcAb was 71% (57/80),45% (36/80),and in HBsAb,HBeAb,HBcAb was 33%( 1/3),0 (0/3),and there were significant differences between two methods (P<0.05 ) ; the others were no significant differences (P > 0.05 ).There was significant difference in the sensitivity of HBsAg between ELISA method and GICA method (P < 0.05 ),but there was no significant difference in HBsAb,HBeAg,HBeAb,HBcAb(P > 0.05 ).There was no significant difference in the specificity of HBsAg,HBsAb,HBsAg,HBeAb and HBcAb between ELISA method and GICA method (P >0.05).There was significant difference in HBsAg among three methods(P <0.05),but there was no significant difference between ELISA method and TRFIA method (P>0.05),and there was significant difference between GICA method and TRFIA method (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in HBsAb,HBeAg,HBeAb and HBcAb among three methods (P > 0.05 ); there was significant difference in both HBsAb and HBeAb positive among three methods (P < 0.05),and there was significant difference between ELISA method,GICA method and TRFIA method (P< 0.05).ConclusionTRFIA method has supreme measuring range,sensitivity and specificity supreme,but the price is higher;ELISA method is in the intermediate level of three methods and price is cheap,and it as well as TRFIA is suitable for the batch detection; GICA accuracy is low,but quick and simple,it is more suitable for the complement of the first two methods.