3.Effect of pH on callus growth, PAL activity and paclitaxel content of plants of Taxus L.
Changzhong SHENG ; Shufang WANG ; Yong WANG ; Ningning WANG ;
Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs 1994;0(10):-
Object To study the effect of pH on callus tissue growth and paclitaxel content of Taxus cuspidata Sieb. et Zucc. and Taxus chinensis var. mairei (Lemee et Le ′vl.) Cheng et L. K. Fu Methods The callus tissues were cultured on B5 medium with defferent pH values, and the growth rate, PAL activity and paclitaxel content were determined. Results Different callus tissues of taxus need different optimum pH values. The pH values, which could promote callus growth significantly, were all inhabitory to PAL activity and accumulation of paxlitaxel. Conclusion pH had great influences on the growth of the callus and the level of secondary metabolism, thereby the synthesis and accumulation of paclitaxel were affected.
4. Clinical efficacy of intervertebral foraminoscopy in the treatment of double segmental protrusion of lumbar intervertebral disc
Changzhong XU ; Zengchun WEI ; Sheng HE
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy 2018;25(17):2263-2266
Objective:
To analyze the efficacy and safety of intervertebral endoscopy in the treatment of double segmental protrusion of lumbar intervertebral disc.
Methods:
From February 2016 to May 2017, 126 patients with double segment lumbar disc herniation diagnosed in Rizhao Central Hospital were divided into the observation group and the control group according to the different treatment methods, with 63 cases in each group.The observation group was treated with intervertebral foramen technique, and the control group was treated with conventional fenestration.The treatment efficacy of the two groups was compared.The differences of VAS score and ODI between the two groups before and after operation were compared.
Results:
Compared with the control group, the observation group had shorter hospitalization time[(7.1±3.1)d vs.(11.5±4.2)d], smaller incision length[(1.2±0.3)cm vs.(4.3±1.6)cm], less blood loss[(22.3±8.2)mL vs.(36.3±9.2)mL], there were statistically significant differences between the two groups (