BACKGROUND: The metal implant internal fixation exhibits good effect for femoral neck fractures of young patients, but few studies report the metal implant treatment for femoral neck fracture in the aged patients. OBJECTIVE: To compare different implant treatments for osteoporotic hip fractures in senile patients. METHODS: A total of 237 aged patients with osteoporotic hip fracture, aged from 60 to 96 years old, were recruited from the hospital between January 1998 and December 2008. There were 32 cases treated by cannulated screw internal fixation, 23 cases by anatomical plate internal fixation, 41 cases by dynamic hip screw internal fixation, 111 cases by bipolar femoral head replacement, and 30 cases by total hip replacement. Comparison of the incidence of complications and the recovery of hip function were performed in each group. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Cannulated screws, anatomical plates, dynamic hip screw internal fixation showed a higher complication rate significantly than bipolar femoral head replacement and total hip arthroplasty (P < 0.01); the good and excellent effect rate in cannulated screw, femoral end plate, and dynamic hip screw fixation was significantly lower than that in bipolar femoral head replacement and total hip arthroplasty (P < 0.001, P < 0.01). The results suggested that artificial joint replacement (bipolar femoral head replacement or total hip replacement) is the optimal choice for aged osteoporotic femoral neck fracture, cannulated screw fixation is suitable for Garden I, dynamic hip screw fixation and proximal femoral anatomical plate fixation fit for intertrochanteric fractures of Jensen-Evans I-Ⅱ; Jensen-Evans Ⅱ-Ⅲ osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures joint replacement is the ideal choice.

Objective: PLASMIC score was evaluated its value in differential diagnosis between the patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and those with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) . Method: Twenty-four patients with TTP and 41 cases with DIC were retrospectively analyzed in this study. The platelet count, average red blood cell volume, indirect bilirubin, creatinine and prothrombin time international normalised ratio were collected, and then PLASMIC scores were calculated. Results: According to the risk classification of PLASMIC score, three (12.5%) TTP patients had moderate risk, and the rest 21 (87.5%) cases had high risk. In DIC patients, 92.7% cases were in low risk group, 4.9% at moderate risk, and only one case had high risk. Of these 65 patients, the sensitivity and the specificity to TTP of the high risk of the scoring system were 87.5% and 97.6%, respectively. Conclusion The patients with high risk of PLASMIC score correlated well with clinical TTP diagnosis. The scoring system showed to be an excellent diagnostic model to distinguish TTP patients from those with DIC.