OBJECTIVE: Precise entry to the upper posterior calyx is key to a successful and safe upper pole access PCNL. The surgeon's knowledge of the average skin to calyceal distance can serve as a guide to avoid inadvertent injury to both the kidney and collateral organs during the percutaneous puncture.
METHODS: The authors analyzed the radiologic images of 84 patients who underwent unenhanced 64-slice helical CT scan (Toshiba®). Skin-to-calyceal distance (SCD) to the upper posterior calyx were measured using the Vitrea® software inherent to the CT scan.
RESULTS: The mean SCDs is non-hydronephrotic kidneys were 54.9 ± 13.7 mm and 61.4 ± 12.5 mm on the right and left, respectively while in hydronephrotic kidneys, the mean SCDs were 60.3 ± 11.8 mm and 58.6 ± 13.1 mm on the right and left, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the right and left upper pole SCD in both groups (p = 0.84).
CONCLUSION: The mean SCD to the upper posterior calyx among Filipino adults is about 6.0 cm. By limiting the depth of the initial puncture to within the distance, the endourologist may avoid overshooting the targeted calyx, thus avoiding undue injury to the kidney or intraabdominal structures.

Human ; Male ; Female ; Adult ; Young Adult ; Kidney Calices ; Tomography, X-ray Computed ; Kidney ; Tomography, Spiral Computed ; Punctures ; Surgeons

Background: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, presents not only as a respiratory ailment but also poses risks of neurological complications whose underlying mechanisms remain unclear. These complications range from mild to severe and may involve direct invasion of the central nervous system (CNS), disruption of the blood-brain barrier, or systemic cytokine effects. Diagnostic challenges persist due to the suboptimal sensitivity of RT-PCR assays. Objective: The present study aimed to review the contrast and non-contrast enhanced cranial CT images of all diagnosed COVID-19 patients in a tertiary referral center with the clinical impression of non-traumatic and nonoperative CNS pathologies. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study analyzing CT images of COVID-19 patients with neurological symptoms. Among 51 included patients, plain CT scans were predominantly used, revealing no acute infarcts or hemorrhages in the majority, while frontal lobe involvement was notable in cases with pathology. Chronic infarcts or ischemic changes were observed in over half of the cases, primarily affecting the anterior circulation. Only one case of meningitis was documented. Results: In the final analysis, 51 patients met the inclusion criteria out of the initial 64 enrolled. The study population, predominantly male with a mean age of 58.02 ± 20.87 years, mainly comprised patients solely diagnosed with COVID-19. Plain CT scans were favored over contrast-enhanced scans (76.50%, n = 39). While most patients had no acute infarcts or hemorrhages, the frontal lobe was commonly affected among stroke patients (9.8%, n = 5). Additionally, a significant portion of patients without acute stroke findings exhibited chronic infarcts or ischemic changes (57.69%, n = 15). Conclusions This study sheds light on the radiological patterns of CNS involvement in COVID-19 patients, highlighting frequent frontal lobe involvement possibly attributed to hypercoagulability and endotheliitis. Further research with larger sample sizes and MRI utilization is recommended to enhance our understanding of CNS manifestations in COVID-19. This study contributes to understanding COVID-19 neurological sequelae, particularly in terms of radiological patterns, among patients presenting with neurological symptoms. The findings highlight the need for comprehensive evaluation and management of neurological complications in COVID-19 patients.
COVID-19 ; stroke

Objective: The mandible is the most common fractured craniofacial bone of all craniofacial fractures in the Philippines, with the mandibular body as the most involved segment of all mandibular fractures. To the best of our knowledge, there are no existing guidelines for the diagnosis and management of mandibular body fractures in particular. General guidelines include the American Academy of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery Foundation (AAOHNSF) Resident Manual of Trauma to the Face, Head, and Neck chapter on Mandibular Trauma, the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS) Clinical Practice Guidelines for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery section on the Mandibular Angle, Body, and Ramus, and a 2013 Cochrane Systematic Review on interventions for the management of mandibular fractures. On the other hand, a very specific Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Unilateral Condylar Fracture of the Mandible was published by the Ministry of Health Malaysia in 2005. Addressing the prevalence of mandibular body fractures, and dearth of specific guidelines for its diagnosis and management, this clinical practice guideline focuses on the management of isolated mandibular body fractures in adults. Purpose: This guideline is meant for all clinicians (otolaryngologists – head and neck surgeons, as well as primary care and specialist physicians, nurses and nurse practitioners, midwives and community health workers, dentists, and emergency first-responders) who may provide care to adults aged 18 years and above that may present with an acute history and physical and/or laboratory examination findings that may lead to a diagnosis of isolated mandibular body fracture and its subsequent medical and surgical management, including health promotion and disease prevention. It is applicable in any setting (including urban and rural primary-care, community centers, treatment units, hospital emergency rooms, operating rooms) in which adults with isolated mandibular body fractures would be identified, diagnosed, or managed. Outcomes are functional resolution of isolated mandibular body fractures; achieving premorbid form; avoiding use of context-inappropriate diagnostics and therapeutics; minimizing use of ineffective interventions; avoiding co-morbid infections, conditions, complications and adverse events; minimizing cost; maximizing health-related quality of life of individuals with isolated mandibular body fracture; increasing patient satisfaction; and preventing recurrence in patients and occurrence in others. Action Statements The guideline development group made strong recommendationsfor the following key action statements: (6) pain management- clinicians should routinely evaluate pain in patients with isolated mandibular body fractures using a numerical rating scale (NRS) or visual analog scale (VAS); analgesics should be routinely offered to patients with a numerical rating pain scale score or VAS of at least 4/10 (paracetamol and a mild opioid with or without an adjuvant analgesic) until the numerical rating pain scale score or VAS is 3/10 at most; (7) antibiotics- prophylactic antibiotics should be given to adult patients with isolated mandibular body fractures with concomitant mucosal or skin opening with or without direct visualization of bone fragments; penicillin is the drug of choice while clindamycin may be used as an alternative; and (14) prevention- clinicians should advocate for compliance with road traffic safety laws (speed limit, anti-drunk driving, seatbelt and helmet use) for the prevention of motor vehicle, cycling and pedestrian accidents and maxillofacial injuries.The guideline development group made recommendations for the following key action statements: (1) history, clinical presentation, and diagnosis - clinicians should consider a presumptive diagnosis of mandibular fracture in adults presenting with a history of traumatic injury to the jaw plus a positive tongue blade test, and any of the following: malocclusion, trismus, tenderness on jaw closure and broken tooth; (2) panoramic x-ray - clinicians may request for panoramic x-ray as the initial imaging tool in evaluating patients with a presumptive clinical diagnosis; (3) radiographs - where panoramic radiography is not available, clinicians may recommend plain mandibular radiography; (4) computed tomography - if available, non-contrast facial CT Scan may be obtained; (5) immobilization - fractures should be temporarily immobilized/splinted with a figure-of-eight bandage until definitive surgical management can be performed or while initiating transport during emergency situations; (8) anesthesia - nasotracheal intubation is the preferred route of anesthesia; in the presence of contraindications, submental intubation or tracheostomy may be performed; (9) observation - with a soft diet may serve as management for favorable isolated nondisplaced and nonmobile mandibular body fractures with unchanged pre - traumatic occlusion; (10) closed reduction - with immobilization by maxillomandibular fixation for 4-6 weeks may be considered for minimally displaced favorable isolated mandibular body fractures with stable dentition, good nutrition and willingness to comply with post-procedure care that may affect oral hygiene, diet modifications, appearance, oral health and functional concerns (eating, swallowing and speech); (11) open reduction with transosseous wiring - with MMF is an option for isolated displaced unfavorable and unstable mandibular body fracture patients who cannot afford or avail of titanium plates; (12) open reduction with titanium plates - ORIF using titanium plates and screws should be performed in isolated displaced unfavorable and unstable mandibular body fracture; (13) maxillomandibular fixation - intraoperative MMF may not be routinely needed prior to reduction and internal fixation; and (15) promotion - clinicians should play a positive role in the prevention of interpersonal and collective violence as well as the settings in which violence occurs in order to avoid injuries in general and mandibular fractures in particular.
Mandibular Fractures ; Jaw Fractures ; Classification ; History ; Diagnosis ; Diagnostic Imaging ; Therapeutics ; Diet Therapy ; Drug Therapy ; Rehabilitation ; General Surgery