1.A Study on the Morphometric Asymmetry of Atlas Vertebrae
Mohd Salahuddin A ; Mukesh S ; Binaya KB ; Nilotpal C
Journal of Surgical Academia 2016;6(1):18-24
The commonly used examination procedures of the upper cervical spine depend upon the symmetry for comparison
and interpretation of joint functions. If symmetry is not normal, then these assessments may mislead the examiners,
allowing them implementation of incorrect treatment plans. Objectives of this study are to explore the possibility that
asymmetry is more common than symmetry and, if it is true, to find out the effects of asymmetry on the
biomechanics of these joints. The study was carried out on 30 atlas vertebrae of cadavers of Indian origin. The
different intra-atlas distances were measured on both sides by digital vernier calliper. All the parameters studied
showed statistically significant differences between the right and left side i.e. a p value of < 0.05. The anteroposterior
diameter of the foramen transversarium, the transverse diameter of the foramen transversarium, the distance
from the midline to medial edge of the vertebral artery groove (inner as well as outer cortex) and the length of the
superior articular facets were more on the right side as compared to the left side. The breadth as well as the length of
the inferior articular facet, the breadth of the superior articular facet and the difference of posterior arch thickness at
the site of vertebral artery groove were more on the left side as compared to the right side. These differences may be
explained by the handedness of an individual, which influences the intra-osteal asymmetry in a characteristically
distinct manner, which needs to be confirmed or refuted in a further study.
Cervical Atlas
2.Activities of erythrocyte antioxidant enzynes and plasma total antioxidant of the patients with cervical cancer
Journal of Vietnamese Medicine 2003;283(4):40-44
By spectrometry, in 78 patients with uterine servical cancer and a control group of 45 healthy person, the activity of erythrocyte antioxidant enzymes and plasma total antioxidant was determined. Results showed a significant decrease of SOD enzyme and blood red cell GPX in cervical cancer patients versus that of the controls. There is a light decrease of total antioxidant state of plasma in patients with cervical cancer versus the controls, and of Hb level in patients with cervical cancer versus the controls. The results suggests a relation between the activity of antioxidant enzyme in cervical cancer patients and DNA damage due to oxygene stress
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
;
Uterine Cervical Diseases
;
Patients
3.Modalities for evaluation of tumor size in cervical cancer.
Suck Chul CHOI ; Kidong KIM ; Sang Il PARK ; Beob Jong KIM ; Moon Hong KIM ; Sang Young RYU ; Eui Don LEE ; Kyung Hee LEE
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2008;19(3):205-205
No abstract available.
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms*
4.Clinical survey of 67Ga-citrate scan in staging for cervical cancer patients.
Kwang Hwy KIM ; Ju Hwa JIN ; Jae Hoon CHUNG
Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1992;35(3):349-358
No abstract available.
Humans
;
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms*
5.Cervical cancer in pregnancy.
Woo Sik LEE ; Chan Kyu PARK ; Dong Hee CHOI ; Jae Wook KIM ; Su Nyung KIM ; Tae Sik HWANG
Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1993;36(7):1111-1119
No abstract available.
Pregnancy*
;
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms*
6.Influence of Gut Microbes on the Brain-Gut Axis (Gut 2011;60:307-317).
Yeong Yeh LEE ; Andrew Seng CHUA
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2011;17(4):427-429
No abstract available.
Axis, Cervical Vertebra
7.Retraction: Comparison of As2O3 and As4O6 in the Detection of SiHa Cervical Cancer Cell Growth Inhibition Pathway.
Yong Wook KIM ; Su Mi BAE ; Keun Ho LEE ; Joon Mo LEE ; Sung Eun NAMKOONG ; Insu P LEE ; Chong Kook KIM ; Jeong Sun SEO ; Jeong Im SIN ; Yong Wan KIM ; Woong Shick AHN
Cancer Research and Treatment 2007;39(1):47-47
No abstract available.
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms*
8.The clinical effect of PG-E2 on cervical ripening and delivery.
Eui Sik JUNG ; Hwe Saeng YANG ; Hye Kyung KIM ; Kyung Won JUNG ; So Young LEE ; Chang Suh PARK ; Sung Jin CHO ; In Suh PARK
Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1993;36(7):3073-3082
No abstract available.
Cervical Ripening*
;
Female
;
Pregnancy
9.Seohan Computerized Hue Test(2): Total Error Scores According to the Age in Normal Subjects and Total Error Scores and Central Cap in Color Defectives.
Minseop KIM ; Jeong Min HWANG ; Won Ryang WEE ; Jin Hak LEE ; Kun LEE ; In Bum LEE
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2001;42(3):453-458
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical usefulness and its own characteristic of Seohan computerized 85-hue test(SCHT-85) which was developed by authors. METHODS: SCHT-85 was performed in 89 normal subjects and 41 subjects with color defects diagnosed by Hardy-Rand-Rittler test(HRR test) and Farnsworth Munsell 100-hue test(FM 100-hue test) and total error scores(TES) according to the age in normal subjects and TES and central cap in subjects with color defects were determined. RESULTS: In normal subjects, TES of SCHT-85 according to the age were slightly higher than those of FM 100-hue test and highly correlated with those of FM 100-hue test. TES of SCHT-85 were increased according to the degree of abnormality in the HRR test in subjects with color defects. TES of SCHT-85 were lower than those of FM 100-hue test in normal subjects and higher than those of FM 100-hue test in subjects with color defects. In subjects with color defects, the central cap of SCHT-80 showed the tendency to yellowgreen-purple axis in protan and green-bluepurple axis in deutan compared to that of FM 100-hue test. CONCLUSIONS: SCHT-85 is highly correlated with FM 100-hue test and seems to be more useful to differentiate normal subjects and subjects with color defects than FM 100-hue test.
Axis, Cervical Vertebra
10.Prognostic factors after radical surgery for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer.
Suk Mo KIM ; Jae Doo YOO ; Byung Ryong KIM ; Young Sam CHOI ; Sung Il JUNG ; Chul Hong KIM ; Ho Sun CHOI ; Jee Soo BYUN
Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000;43(8):1422-1430
No abstract available.
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms*