1.A Case of Capecitabine and Cisplatin-induced Cutaneous Hyperpigmentation.
Sang Hyeon HWANG ; Ji Hye PARK ; Chong Won CHOI ; Ga Young LEE ; Won Serk KIM
Korean Journal of Dermatology 2014;52(3):210-212
No abstract available.
Cisplatin
;
Hyperpigmentation*
;
Capecitabine
2.Nasolacrimal Duct Stenosis after Oral Capecitabine Administration
Yeonji JANG ; Namju KIM ; Keun Wook LEE ; Ho Kyung CHOUNG ; Sang In KHWARG
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2019;33(1):95-96
No abstract available.
Capecitabine
;
Constriction, Pathologic
;
Nasolacrimal Duct
3.Cessation or dose reduction of Capecitabine due to Complications in Patients with Colon Cancer.
Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology 2010;26(4):240-240
No abstract available.
Capecitabine
;
Colon
;
Colonic Neoplasms
;
Deoxycytidine
;
Fluorouracil
;
Humans
4.Hand-foot Syndrome Due to Capecitabine.
Chong Won CHOI ; Chang Hun HUH
Korean Journal of Dermatology 2005;43(7):965-968
Hand-foot syndrome, also known as acral erythema, is a distinctive and relatively common toxic reaction due to some anticancer drugs. It is characterized by a painful erythema on the palms and soles during chemotherapy, which is often preceeded by paresthesia. We report two cases of hand-foot syndrome induced by capecitabine, which is a relatively brand-new oral anticancer agent. Hand-foot syndrome is one of the most common complications of capecitabine, and is on the increase. Therefore, dermatologists should be aware of it.
Drug Therapy
;
Erythema
;
Hand-Foot Syndrome*
;
Paresthesia
;
Capecitabine
5.Metronomic chemotherapy with capecitabine for metastatic colorectal cancer in very elderly patients.
Yun Hwa JUNG ; Won Jik LEE ; Jae Ho BYEON ; In Kyu LEE ; Chi Wha HAN ; In Sook WOO
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2017;32(5):926-929
No abstract available.
Administration, Metronomic
;
Aged*
;
Capecitabine*
;
Colorectal Neoplasms*
;
Drug Therapy*
;
Humans
6.XELOX ± Bevacizumab compared to FOLFOX4 ± Bevacizumab in first line metastatic colorectal cancer in a non-reimbursed health care system: A cost analysis.
Tan Jerry Y. ; Yacat Andrew A ; Sacdalan Dennis L.
Acta Medica Philippina 2015;49(2):64-67
INTRODUCTION: XELOX is non-inferior to FOLFOX-4 as a first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. This study compares the costs associated with XEL0X+/-bevacizumab versus FOLFOX4+/-bevacizumab in a non-reimbursed, out of pocket Philippine health care system.
METHODS: This is a cost-minimization analysis using Philippine General Hospital as base case and a typical Filipino patient of 60 kg with BSA 1.66. The outcome data were derived from the N016966 trial. These included the drugs capecitabine, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab (BEV); chemotherapy cycles and corresponding hospital admission for each regimen; resources associated with treatment of adverse events such hospital days, ambulatory consultations, concomitant
medication, and central venous line insertion/removal, with costs and charges based on the local setting.
RESULTS: Highest cost (direct and/or indirect) was for FOLFOX4+BEV, followed by XEL0X+BEV, FOLFOX4, and then XELOX. The use of XELOX resulted in a cost saving of PhP 158,642 per patient compared with FOLFOX4. The use of XEL0X+BEV resulted in a cost saving of PhP 186,144 per patient compared with FOLFOX4+BEV.
CONCLUSION: XEL0X+/-BEV is less costly than FOLFOX4-F/-BEV in an out-of-pocket Philippine tertiary hospital setting from the patient's perspective.
Xelox ; Folfox ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; Capecitabine ; Fluorouracil ; Oxaliplatin ; Bevacizumab
7.Effect of Suboptimal Chemotherapy on Preoperative Chemoradiation in Rectal Cancer.
Jihye LEE ; Hyun Cheol KANG ; Eui Kyu CHIE ; Gyeong Hoon KANG ; Jae Gahb PARK ; Do Youn OH ; Seock Ah IM ; Tae You KIM ; Yung Jue BANG ; Sung Whan HA
The Journal of the Korean Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology 2009;27(2):78-83
PURPOSE: To examine the effect of suboptimal chemotherapy in patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 43 patients who received preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy, followed by radical surgery for the treatment of pathologically proven adenocarcinoma of the rectum from April 2003 to April 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. The delivered radiation dose ranged from 41.4 to 50.4 Gy. The standard group consisted of patients receiving two cycles of a 5-FU bolus injection for three days on the first and fifth week of radiotherapy or twice daily with capecitabine. The standard group included six patients for each regimen. The non-standard group consisted of patients receiving one cycle of 5-FU bolus injection for three days on the first week of radiotherapy. The non-standard group included 31 patients. Radical surgery was performed at a median of 58 days after the end of radiotherapy. A low anterior resection was performed in 36 patients, whereas an abdominoperineal resection was performed in 7 patients. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between the groups with respect to pathologic responses ranging from grades 3 to 5 (83.3% vs. 67.7%, p=0.456), downstaging (75.0% vs. 67.7%, p=0.727), and a radial resection margin greater than 2 mm (66.7% vs. 83.9%, p=0.237). The sphincter-saving surgery rate in low-lying rectal cancers was lower in the non-standard group (100% vs. 75%, p=0.068). There was no grade 3 or higher toxicity observed in all patients. CONCLUSION: Considering that the sphincter-saving surgery rate in low-lying rectal cancer was marginally lower for patients treated with non-standard, suboptimal chemotherapy, and that toxicity higher than grade 2 was not observed in the both groups, suboptimal chemotherapy should be avoided in this setting.
Adenocarcinoma
;
Chemoradiotherapy
;
Deoxycytidine
;
Fluorouracil
;
Humans
;
Medical Records
;
Rectal Neoplasms
;
Rectum
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Capecitabine
8.Hand-foot Syndrome Following Capecitabine (Xeloda(R)) Monotherapy for Colorectal Cancer.
Soon Do PARK ; Kil Yeon LEE ; Sun Jin PARK ; Suk Hwan LEE ; Sang Mok LEE
Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology 2009;25(4):227-233
PURPOSE: Capecitabine (Xeloda(R)), which is a systemic prodrug of 5-fluorouracil, can be used in oral formulation for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer as a 1st line or an alternative modality to I.V. 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. One of the most common side effects of this drug is hand-foot syndrome (HFS), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome. We planned this study to clarify the incidence and the clinical course of severe hand-foot syndrome (WHO classification, grade 3 or 4) following capecitabine monotherapy for adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer. METHODS: From August 2006 to August 2008, 45 colorectal cancer patients were treated with capecitabine, 1,250 mg/m2, orally administered twice daily for 2 wk, followed by 1 wk of rest, given as 3-wk cycles. Seven of them discontinued the drug within 3rd cycle due to poor performance status, gastrointestinal troubles, or other causes. We retrospectively analyzed the remaining 38 patients' medical records and defined the incidence and the clinical course of HFS. RESULTS: Of the 38 patients, 17 (44.7%) suffered severe HFS after capecitabine monotherapy. Of those 17, 5 (29.4%) had severe symptoms after the 1st chemotherapy cycle, and 14 patients (82.4%) had severe symptoms within the 4th cycle. Three of the 14 female and 14 of the 24 male patients complained of severe HFS, showing a statistical male predominance (P=0.043). Eventually, we had to decrease capecitabine to 75% of the daily dose in 12 patients and to 50% in one patient, and to discontinue its use in 4 patients. CONCLUSION: Capecitabine monotherapy very frequently provokes severe HFS, especially in the early cycles of chemotherapy and in males.
Capecitabine
;
Colorectal Neoplasms
;
Deoxycytidine
;
Female
;
Fluorouracil
;
Hand-Foot Syndrome
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Male
;
Medical Records
;
Retrospective Studies
9.A Phase II Study of Additional Four-Week Chemotherapy With Capecitabine During the Resting Periods After Six-Week Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.
Kyung Ha LEE ; Min Sang SONG ; Jun Boem PARK ; Jin Soo KIM ; Dae Young KANG ; Ji Yeon KIM
Annals of Coloproctology 2013;29(5):192-197
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of additional 4-week chemotherapy with capecitabine during the resting periods after a 6-week neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: Radiotherapy was delivered to the whole pelvis at a total dose of 50.4 Gy for 6 weeks. Oral capecitabine was administered at a dose of 825 mg/m2 twice daily for 10 weeks. Surgery was performed 2-4 weeks following the completion of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Between January 2010 and September 2011, 44 patients were enrolled. Forty-three patients underwent surgery, and 41 patients completed the scheduled treatment. Pathologic complete remission (pCR) was noted in 9 patients (20.9%). T down-staging and N down-staging were observed in 32 patients (74.4%) and 33 patients (76.7%), respectively. Grade 3 to 5 toxicity was noted in 5 patients (11.4%). The pCR rate was similar with the pCR rates obtained after conventional NCRT at our institute and at other institutes. CONCLUSION: This study showed that additional 4-week chemotherapy with capecitabine during the resting periods after 6-week NCRT was safe, but it was no more effective than conventional NCRT.
Chemoradiotherapy*
;
Deoxycytidine
;
Drug Therapy*
;
Fluorouracil
;
Humans
;
Neoadjuvant Therapy
;
Pelvis
;
Polymerase Chain Reaction
;
Rectal Neoplasms*
;
Capecitabine
10.A Phase II Study of Additional Four-Week Chemotherapy With Capecitabine During the Resting Periods After Six-Week Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.
Kyung Ha LEE ; Min Sang SONG ; Jun Boem PARK ; Jin Soo KIM ; Dae Young KANG ; Ji Yeon KIM
Annals of Coloproctology 2013;29(5):192-197
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of additional 4-week chemotherapy with capecitabine during the resting periods after a 6-week neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: Radiotherapy was delivered to the whole pelvis at a total dose of 50.4 Gy for 6 weeks. Oral capecitabine was administered at a dose of 825 mg/m2 twice daily for 10 weeks. Surgery was performed 2-4 weeks following the completion of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Between January 2010 and September 2011, 44 patients were enrolled. Forty-three patients underwent surgery, and 41 patients completed the scheduled treatment. Pathologic complete remission (pCR) was noted in 9 patients (20.9%). T down-staging and N down-staging were observed in 32 patients (74.4%) and 33 patients (76.7%), respectively. Grade 3 to 5 toxicity was noted in 5 patients (11.4%). The pCR rate was similar with the pCR rates obtained after conventional NCRT at our institute and at other institutes. CONCLUSION: This study showed that additional 4-week chemotherapy with capecitabine during the resting periods after 6-week NCRT was safe, but it was no more effective than conventional NCRT.
Chemoradiotherapy*
;
Deoxycytidine
;
Drug Therapy*
;
Fluorouracil
;
Humans
;
Neoadjuvant Therapy
;
Pelvis
;
Polymerase Chain Reaction
;
Rectal Neoplasms*
;
Capecitabine