1.Are Indians and females less tolerant to pain? An observational study using a laboratory pain model.
E Das Gupta ; A H Zailinawati ; A W Lim ; J B Chan ; S H Yap ; Y Y Hla ; M A Kamil ; C L Teng
The Medical journal of Malaysia 2009;64(2):111-3
In Malaysia, it is a common belief among health care workers that females and Indians have lower pain threshold. This experience, although based on anecdotal experience in the healthcare setting, does not allow differentiation between pain tolerance, and pain expression. To determine whether there is a difference in the tolerance to pain between the three main ethnic groups, namely the Malays, Chinese and Indians as well as between males and females. This was a prospective study, using a laboratory pain model (ischaemic pain tolerance) to determine the pain tolerance of 152 IMU medical students. The mean age of the students was 21.8 years (range 18-29 years). All of them were unmarried. The median of ischaemic pain tolerance for Malays, Chinese and Indians were 639s, 695s and 613s respectively (p = 0.779). However, statistically significant difference in ischaemic pain tolerance for males and females Indian students were observed. Possible ethnic difference in pain tolerance in casual observation is not verified by this laboratory pain model. Difference in pain tolerance between genders is shown only for Indians.
Pain Threshold
;
Pain
;
Indian race
;
seconds
;
Models
2.Parental, Perinatal, and Childhood Risk Factors for Development of Irritable Bowel Syndrome:A Systematic Review
En X S LOW ; Maimouna N K Al MANDHARI ; Charles C HERNDON ; Evelyn X L LOO ; Elizabeth H THAM ; Kewin T H SIAH
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2020;26(4):437-446
Background/Aims:
Adverse early life experiences are associated with the development of stroke, cancer, diabetes, and chronic respiratory and ischemic heart diseases. These negative experiences may also play a role in the development of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)––a functional gastrointestinal disease. This review discusses the research to date on the parental, perinatal, and childhood risk and protective factors associated with the development of IBS.
Methods:
A literature search was completed for studies published between 1966 and 2018 that investigated premorbid factors occurring during the perinatal and childhood periods as well as parental factors that were associated with the development of IBS.
Results:
Twenty-seven studies fulfilled the review criteria. Risk factors that appeared in more than one study included: (1) parental IBS, substance abuse, parental punishment, and rejection as parental risk factors; (2) low birth weight as a perinatal risk factor; and (3) crowded living conditions in low-income families, childhood anxiety, depression, or child abuse as childhood risk factors. Protective factors for IBS were emotional warmth from the parents and being born to an older mother.
Conclusions
More effort is needed to identify what fetal and maternal factors are associated with low birth weight and IBS. A well-executed prospective birth cohort with a collection of bio-samples and functional data will provide a better understanding of how adversity and the interplay between genetics, epigenetics, and numerous risk factors affect the development of IBS.
3.International validation of the Chinese university prognostic index for staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: a joint United Kingdom and Hong Kong study.
Stephen L CHAN ; Philip J JOHNSON ; Frankie MO ; Sarah BERHANE ; Mabel TENG ; Anthony W H CHAN ; Ming C POON ; Paul B S LAI ; Simon YU ; Anthony T C CHAN ; Winnie YEO
Chinese Journal of Cancer 2014;33(10):481-491
The outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients significantly differs between western and eastern population centers. Our group previously developed and validated the Chinese University Prognostic Index (CUPI) for the prognostication of HCC among the Asian HCC patient population. In the current study, we aimed to validate the CUPI using an international cohort of patients with HCC and to compare the CUPI to two widely used staging systems, the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification and the Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP). To accomplish this goal, two cohorts of patients were enrolled in the United Kingdom (UK; n = 567; 2006-2011) and Hong Kong (HK; n = 517; 2007-2012). The baseline clinical data were recorded. The performances of the CUPI, BCLC, and CLIP were compared in terms of a concordance index (C-index) and were evaluated in subgroups of patients according to treatment intent. The results revealed that the median follow-up durations of the UK and HK cohorts were 27.9 and 29.8 months, respectively. The median overall survival of the UK and HK cohorts were 22.9 and 8.6 months, respectively. The CUPI stratified the patients in both cohorts into three risk subgroups corresponding to distinct outcomes. The median overall survival of the CUPI low-, intermediate-, and high-risk subgroups were 3.15, 1.24, and 0.29 years, respectively, in the UK cohort and were 2.07, 0.32, and 0.10 years, respectively, in the HK cohort. For the patients who underwent curative treatment, the prognostic performance did not differ between the three staging systems, and all were suboptimal. For those who underwent palliative treatment, the CUPI displayed the highest C-index, indicating that this staging system was the most informative for both cohorts. In conclusion, the CUPI is applicable to both western and eastern HCC patient populations. The performances of the three staging systems differed according to treatment intent, and the CUPI was demonstrated to be optimal for those undergoing palliative treatment. A more precise staging system for early-stage disease patients is required.
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
;
Hong Kong
;
Humans
;
Liver Neoplasms
;
Neoplasm Staging
;
Prognosis
;
United Kingdom
4.Guidelines for antimicrobial stewardship training and practice.
Christine B TENG ; Winnie LEE ; Chay Leng YEO ; Siok Ying LEE ; Tat Ming NG ; Siang Fei YEOH ; Wee Heng LIM ; Andrea L KWA ; Koh Cheng THOON ; Say Tat OOI ; Thean Yen TAN ; Li Yang HSU ; David C LYE ; Maciej Piotr CHLEBICKI
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2012;41(1):29-34