Introduction: In the modern era of Medicine, total hip arthroplasty (THA) is found to last longer than ever before due to the fact that there has been improved bearing surfaces and materials available. Despite these modern approaches, failure caused by polyethylene wear, aseptic loosening, instability and mispositioning and even infection could affect THA survival. In the course of addressing anti-wear characteristics of the conventional polyethylene surface various approaches have been made. To date, there are very limited studies done in which polyethylene liner is better. General Objective: To compare the effects of vitamin E diffused highly cross-linked polyethylene liner versus moderately cross-linked polyethylene liner in THA. Methodology: Meta-analysis research design was used in this study. The primary investigators conducted a comprehensive literature search from Medline, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Elsevier, Google Scholar, Embase and ClinicalTrial.gov as electronic database. All randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of vitamin E diffused highly cross-linked polyethylene liner versus moderately cross-linked polyethylene liner in THA were included in the review. Conclusions The investigation disclosed no statistical significance between moderately cross-linked polyethylene liner and vitamin E diffused highly cross-linked polyethylene liner in terms of migration, head penetration and wear on mediolateral, longitudinal and anteroposterior axes after 2 and 5 years of undergoing THA. Moreover, the data pertaining to patient reported outcomes and clinical outcomes measure also indicated no statistical significance between moderately cross-linked polyethylene liner and vitamin E diffused highly cross-linked polyethylene liner. This indicates that vitamin E diffused highly cross-linked polyethylene liner is comparable with the conventional moderately cross-linked polyethylene liner. Vitamin E-infused highly cross-linked polyethylene ( VEPE) showed an almost similar stability with regard to the wear rates and the component showed similar stability with that of moderately cross-linked polyethylene liner.
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip

Background: Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head results from intraosseous pathology causing functional impairment. Early diagnosis allows conservative treatment like core decompression, delaying total hip arthroplasty. Objective: This meta-analysis aims to summarize platelet-rich plasma's (PRP) impact as an adjunct to core decompression (CD) on treatment outcomes and femoral head preservation in hip AVN. Methods: The study conducted a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, Google Scholar and Med Line, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and previous meta-analyses from various databases. Using a random effects model, it compared PRP+CD with bone grafting to CD with bone grafting alone in AVN patients, evaluating function, pain scores, disease progression and the need for hip surgery. Results: The meta-analysis examined 1041 records and included three studies. The primary outcomes were function and pain scores using Harris Hip Scoring (HHS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Postoperative HHS scores at final follow-up favored the PRP+CD group significantly over CD alone. Postoperative VAS scores showed a trend towards higher scores in the CD alone group. The PRP+CD group demonstrated higher survival from disease progression compared to CD alone. Overall, the study suggests that PRP+CD led to better functional outcomes and disease progression outcomes than CD alone in AVN of the hip. Conclusion The PRP+CD treatment group showed significant benefits in AVN patients compared to CD alone, including higher HHS scores, improved disease progression survival and reduced need for hip surgery. Although PRP+CD resulted in decreased VAS scores, the difference was not statistically significant.
Osteonecrosis ; Femur Head ; Platelet-Rich Plasma ; Randomized Controlled Trial