1.The effect of 6 weeks of treatment with inhaled budesonide on bronc-hial hyperresponsiveness and adrenal function in asthmatic patients.
Kwan Hyoung KIM ; Yong Seok OH ; Chi Hong KIM ; Soon Seong KWON ; Young Kyoon KIM ; Ki Don HAN ; Hwa Sik MOON ; Jeong Sup SONG ; Sung Hak PARK
Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases 1992;39(3):219-227
No abstract available.
Budesonide*
;
Humans
2.Effects of different dosage of inhaled budesonide and beclomethasone dipropionate on the cortisol concentration.
Young Seung LEE ; Soo Mi CHOI ; Ha Sook SONG ; Jong Ku KIM ; Yong Chul LEE ; Yang Keun RHEE
Korean Journal of Medicine 1993;45(6):726-735
No abstract available.
Beclomethasone*
;
Budesonide*
;
Hydrocortisone*
3.The Effect of Nebulized Budesonide and Intreamuscular Dexamethasone in Patients with Moderate Group.
Su Jin LEE ; Hyun Ju LEE ; Su Ja HWANG ; Eun Ae PARK ; Ho Seong KIM ; Seung Joo LEE
Pediatric Allergy and Respiratory Disease 1998;8(2):248-255
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect f nebulized budensonide and intramuscular dexamethasone in relieving laryngeal obstruction of croup. METHODS: Forty patients with moderate croup (croup scores of 3 to 7 out of 17) were randomly assigned to budesonide group [1 mg(2 ml) of nebulized budesonide, N=15], dexamethasone group [intramuscular dexamethasone(0.5 mg/kg) and nebulized saline, N=10] and control group(2 ml of nebulized saline, N=15). The changes of croup scores, heart rate, respiratory rate, and arterial oxygen saturation(SaO2) were observed at post-treatment of 2, 24, 36 and 48 hours. The duration of admission and the rates of improvement to the croup score of < or = 1 at the post-treatments were compared. RESULTS: Croup scores at 12, 24 and 36 hours post treatments were 1.7+/-0.8, 1.1+/-0.7 and 0.8+/-0.7 in budensonide group and 2.2+/-0.7, 1.2+/-0.8 and 1.0+/-0.5 in dexamethasone group respectively, which were significantly lower rate, and SaO2 were not significantly different among the three groups. Improved rates to croup score of <1 in budesonide group at post-treatments of 12, 24, and 36 jpirs were 53%, 73% and 87%, which were significantly higher than 0%, 13%, and 47% in control group (p<0.05). Improved rate to croup score of < or = 1 in dexamethasone group was 60^ which was significantly hgier than 13% in control group only at post-treatment of 24 hours (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Nebulized budesonide and intramusculan dexamethasone are both effective in reducing obstructive symptoms in patients with moderate croup. The effect of nebulized budesonide was more rapid than that of intramuscular dexamethasone.
Budesonide*
;
Croup
;
Dexamethasone*
;
Heart Rate
;
Humans
;
Oxygen
;
Respiratory Rate
4.A Comparison of the Therapeutic Effects of Powder and Aerosolized Budesonide in the Treatment of Perennial Allergic Rhinitis.
Yang Gi MIN ; Hong Ju PARK ; Ji Hun MO ; Ja Bock YUN ; In Ho JUNG ; Tae Young KWON
Journal of Rhinology 1998;5(1):11-14
The aims of this study are to compare the efficacy and side effects of intranasal budesonide as a dry powder and as a freonpropelled pressurized aerosol in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis and to assess the difference in compliance with the powder and aerosol. The study design was a randomized, double-blind crossover between two treatment groups over a six-week period. Twelve patients with symptomatic perennial allergic rhinitis received 400 microgram of intranasal budesonide administered daily as two puffs/nostril/day of the drug delivered by a freon-propelled aerosol for the first three weeks and as one inhalation/nostril/day of the pure drug powder for the next three weeks. Fourteen adults with allergic rhinitis received the drug in the reverse sequence. Patients recorded daily symptoms on diaries, and, at each clinic visit, adverse effects were recorded. Compliance with the powder and with the aerosol was also evaluated. During the six weeks, there were significant improvements in symptoms in both treatment groups, and the differences in efficacy and compliance with the medication between the two groups were not significant. Adverse effects included headaches, epistaxis, and nasal dryness ; however, they were not serious and equally distributed in the two groups. We conclude that powder and aerosolized budesonide improve the symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis significantly with little difference in efficacy, side effects, and preference.
Adult
;
Ambulatory Care
;
Budesonide*
;
Compliance
;
Epistaxis
;
Headache
;
Humans
;
Rhinitis*
5.A Comparison of the Therapeutic Effects of Powder and Aerosolized Budesonide in the Treatment of Perennial Allergic Rhinitis.
Yang Gi MIN ; Hong Ju PARK ; Ji Hun MO ; Ja Bock YUN ; In Ho JUNG ; Tae Young KWON
Journal of Rhinology 1998;5(1):11-14
The aims of this study are to compare the efficacy and side effects of intranasal budesonide as a dry powder and as a freonpropelled pressurized aerosol in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis and to assess the difference in compliance with the powder and aerosol. The study design was a randomized, double-blind crossover between two treatment groups over a six-week period. Twelve patients with symptomatic perennial allergic rhinitis received 400 microgram of intranasal budesonide administered daily as two puffs/nostril/day of the drug delivered by a freon-propelled aerosol for the first three weeks and as one inhalation/nostril/day of the pure drug powder for the next three weeks. Fourteen adults with allergic rhinitis received the drug in the reverse sequence. Patients recorded daily symptoms on diaries, and, at each clinic visit, adverse effects were recorded. Compliance with the powder and with the aerosol was also evaluated. During the six weeks, there were significant improvements in symptoms in both treatment groups, and the differences in efficacy and compliance with the medication between the two groups were not significant. Adverse effects included headaches, epistaxis, and nasal dryness ; however, they were not serious and equally distributed in the two groups. We conclude that powder and aerosolized budesonide improve the symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis significantly with little difference in efficacy, side effects, and preference.
Adult
;
Ambulatory Care
;
Budesonide*
;
Compliance
;
Epistaxis
;
Headache
;
Humans
;
Rhinitis*
6.Effect of Inhaled Corticosteroid and Leukotriene Receptor Antagonist in Cough-variant Asthma Patients under Five Years of Age.
Pediatric Allergy and Respiratory Disease 2005;15(3):263-269
PURPOSE: Cough-variant asthma (CVA) is a common cause of chronic cough in young children. Some children who have CVA eventually develop classic asthma. We evaluated the effect of inhaled corticosteroid and leukotriene receptor antagonist in young children who are suspected of having CVA. METHODS: Thirty-seven cough-variant asthma patients younger than 5-years-old were enrolled in this study. Fifteen were treated with pulmicort nebulization (500 micorgram, bid) for 4 weeks (Group A). Fourteen were treated with leukotriene receptor antagonist (Singulair, 4 mg) for 4 weeks (Group B). Eleven were treated with intermittent short-acting beta2-agonist nebulization (Group C). We evaluated the mean change of symptom score in night cough and sleep disturbance. RESULTS: There were no differences in age, sex, total IgE, total eosinophil count or duration of cough among the three groups. Group A and B showed significant improvement of night cough and sleep disturbance after treatment. (P< 0.05) In Group A and B, night cough was significantly improved after treatment more than in control. (P< 0.05) But improvements in sleep disturbance didn't have any signigicant differences between the three groups. (P= 1.0) CONCLUSION: Inhaled corticosteroid and leukotriene receptor antagonist are effective to control chronic cough in CVA children younger than 5-years-old.
Asthma*
;
Budesonide
;
Child
;
Cough
;
Eosinophils
;
Humans
;
Immunoglobulin E
;
Receptors, Leukotriene*
7.The Protective Effect of Inhaled Heparin, Cromolyn, Budesonide, and Furosemide on Exercise-induced Asthma.
Sin Hyung LEE ; Jae Jeong SHIM ; Sang Youb LEE ; Jae Youn CHO ; Kwang Ho IN ; Se Hwa YOO ; Kyung Ho KANG
Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases 1998;45(6):1188-1198
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to determine the protective effect of antiasthmatic activity of inhaled heparin, cromolyn sodium, budesonide, furosemide in exercise-induced asthma(EIA). The other important considerable point of this study was the mechanism of bronchoconstriction on EIA. METHOD: Eight subjects with a history of EIA were studied on 5 different experiment days. After obtaining baseline FEV(1) and FVC, subjects performed a standardized exercise challenge. EIA was assessed by measurement of FEV(1) before and after exercise. On experiment day 4, the exercise challengs was performed after the subjects inhaled either heparin (1,000 units/kg/day for 5 days), furosemide (1 mg/kg for 5 days), cromolyn(4 mg/kg for 5 days), or budesonide (400 micrograms/day for 5 days). On experiment day 5, the methacholine brochial provocation test was performed. On experiment day 3, activated partial thromboplastine time(aPTT) was checked. RESULTS: Maximum decrements of FEV(1)(mean+/-SE) among o to 120 minutes after exerise were as follows : heparin was 83.1+/-4.81% (p=0.010), furosemide was 80.5+/-6.87% (p=0.071), cromolyn was 86.8+/-6.53% (p=0.340), and budesonide was 79.4+/-7.31% (p=0.095). Above medications were copmpared to the control value (72.5+/-18.2%) by paired t-test. No medications had effect on PD of methacholine bronchial provocation test. The results were control (1.58+/-0.49 mumol), heparin(4.17+/-1.96 mumol), forosemide (1.85+/-0.86 mumol), cromolyn (2.19+/-0.89 mumol) and budesonide (3.38+/-1.77 mumol), respectively(p>0.05). The inhaled heparin had no effect of anticoagulation. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that inhaled heparin has a protective effect on EIA. The effect of inhaled cromolyn was statisitically absent with manufacture's recommended dosage on EIA. So, the dosage of cromolyn should be carefully evaluated in future. Although inhalation of budesonide and furosemide have no statistical significance compared to control, these drugs also have some protective effects on EIA.
Asthma, Exercise-Induced*
;
Bronchial Provocation Tests
;
Bronchoconstriction
;
Budesonide*
;
Cromolyn Sodium*
;
Furosemide*
;
Heparin*
;
Inhalation
;
Methacholine Chloride
;
Thromboplastin
8.A Case of Atopic Dermatitis with Egg and Budesonide Hypersensitivity.
Hyun Wook KIM ; Gyeong Il KIM ; Chun Wook PARK ; Cheol Heon LEE
Korean Journal of Dermatology 2001;39(11):1286-1289
The egg is one of the most common food allergens, and immunologic reactivity to egg antigens may be an early marker of atopic disorders. Budesonide is a synthetic non-halogenated corticosteroid with 16 , 17 -butylidene dioxy portion, and it is one of the common causes of corticosteroid allergy together with tixocortol pivalate and hydrocortisone butyrate. The patient was a 12 year old female. She had developed atopic dermatitis mainly on the face since she was 1 year old. She applied budesonide cream for treating atopic dermatitis in our dermatologic clinic, but her facial lesion was aggravated. On past medical history, she had been suffered from an egg allergy since 1-year-old, and she was accidentally exposed to egg and developed large pruritic erythematous patch on entire body. This case could be considered as atopic dermatitis with egg and budesonide hypersensitivity on the basis of the clinical features and prick test, MAST, open food challenge and patch test.
Allergens
;
Budesonide*
;
Butyrates
;
Child
;
Dermatitis, Atopic*
;
Egg Hypersensitivity
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Hydrocortisone
;
Hypersensitivity*
;
Ovum*
;
Patch Tests
9.New regimen of inhaled corticosteroid in preschool children with asthma.
Dae Hyun LIM ; Jeong Hee KIM ; Byong Kwan SON
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2012;55(12):1201-1206
Daily low-dose inhaled corticosteroid in preschool children with asthma is recommended to prevent the development of asthma symptom and sign based on many asthma management guidelines. But the retarded growth after long-term steroid inhalation has been concerned. Recently the method of intermittent high-dose (suspension, 1,000 microg, 2 times a day for 7 days) budesonide inhalation when the initial phase to develop the asthma exacerbation was studied to compare the efficacy and safety with daily low-dose budesonide (500 microg) inhalation regimen in preschool children positive with modified asthma predictive index in recurrent wheezer during the study period with 52 weeks. There were no significant difference between two regimen with respect to the frequency of exacerbations, the time to the first exacerbation and to the second exacerbation, and the frequency of treatment failure. The total exposure to budesonide over the period was less in the intermittent high-dose regimen than in the daily low-dose regimen. There were no significant difference in change in height. But the change in height from baseline in intermittent high-dose regimen group was 8.01 cm and in daily low-dose was 7.76 cm. We need the more clinical studies in preschool children with persistent moderate and severe asthma and in various country and nations. It is suggested the intermittent high-dose budesonide inhalation regimen in preschool children with freqeunt wheezing may be a very good alternative to control the allergic inflammation and symptoms of asthma without concerning the adverse effect of steroid.
Asthma
;
Budesonide
;
Child
;
Child, Preschool
;
Humans
;
Inflammation
;
Inhalation
;
Respiratory Sounds
;
Treatment Failure
10.Effective Treatment of Intractable Diarrhea Associated with Common Variable Immunodeficiency with Oral Budesonide.
Ji Hyun JEON ; Do Hyoung LIM ; Chang Hyun PARK ; Hyeok Chan KWON ; Ji Yeon JUNG ; Keon Woo PARK ; Soon Il LEE
Korean Journal of Medicine 2014;86(5):637-640
Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is the most common symptomatic primary antibody deficiency syndrome and has a high prevalence of gastrointestinal complications. We report the case of a 36-year-old male with CVID who presented with chronic intractable diarrhea and malabsorption. A comprehensive evaluation revealed no secondary causes of his symptoms. He was treated symptomatically without improvement. After receiving systemic steroid treatment, his symptoms improved, but returned soon after tapering the steroid. When he was subsequently administered oral budesonide, his symptoms and quality of life improved; this effect lasted for 20 months without unacceptable side effects.
Adult
;
Budesonide*
;
Common Variable Immunodeficiency*
;
Diarrhea*
;
Humans
;
Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes
;
Male
;
Prevalence
;
Quality of Life