Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the perceptions and satisfaction of the graduates and trainees of the fellowship programs of the Philippine General Hospital - Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (PGH DOVS). Methods: A uniform survey was conducted among all graduates and ongoing trainees of the External Disease and Cornea, Medical and Surgical Vitreo-Retina, Glaucoma, Orbit and Oculoplastics, and Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus fellowship programs. The survey link was emailed to all the participants. Results: Response rate was 74%. Majority of graduates were clustered in the National Capital Region (NCR) (56.4%), and Luzon excluding NCR (46.4%). Majority of the graduates perceived that the objectives of their fellowship program were met (60%). Overall, 65.4% of the fellows assessed their training as completely adequate. Strengths identified were volume of patients, level of independence, and consultant supervision. Weaknesses identified were the lack of specialized instruments, lack of inter-department exposures, and difficulties in the conduct of research. Conclusion Majority were satisfied with their training and would recommend their training program to others despite the difficulties and deficiencies identified. Some of the perceived weaknesses observed by the graduates have been addressed since their graduation from their program. This is the first attempt to assess post-residency fellowship programs in ophthalmology in the Philippines.
fellowship ; training ; ophthalmology ; evaluation ; assessment

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of a selected population of patients on herbal dietary supplements (HDS).
METHOD: Methodological triangulation was used to generate a conceptual framework on HDS KAP. A survey of 175 patients was performed to measure knowledge and attitudes regarding HDS and SPSS was used for data analysis. Inverviews and focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted to further explore the attitudes and practices, and constant comparison method was used for analysis of responses.
RESULTS: Respondents were generally aware of HDS. Majority of survey respondents believed that HDS are different from conventional drugs (52.0%, p<0.05). However, knowledge on the role of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in regulating HDS and understanding of "No Approved Therapeutic Claims" were poor.
The attitude toward HDS was generally positive. Majority (64.0%, p<0.05) were positive toward their perceived health benefits as claimed for the prevention of diseases, while a smaller percentage (46.9%, p<0.05) believed in their benefit for the treatment of diseases. A favorable attitude regardings HDS safety was observed due to the idea of their being "herbal" and "natural".
Among the survey respondents, only 22% were HDS users. Family was shown to promote use while cost deterred their use.
CONCLUSION: Individual knowledge and attitudes on HDS exert significant influence toward HDS practices. Factors that promote use are poor knowledge and positive attitudes toward HDS. Good knowledge seems to lead to judicious use or non-use.

Human ; Male ; Female ; Aged ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Focus Groups ; United States Food And Drug Administration ; Awareness ; Perception ; Safety ; Attitude ; Dietary Supplements

Objective: This study was designed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on ophthalmology training from the perspective of ophthalmology residents and fellows in the Philippines. Methods: A 55-item online survey on the COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on ophthalmology training was sent to 168 ophthalmologists-in-training from March 15, 2021 to April 19, 2021. Participants from all ophthalmology training programs in the Philippines were selected via random sampling and proportional allocation. Results: A total of 158 ophthalmologists-in-training (138 residents and 20 fellows) completed the survey. The areas of ophthalmology training that were found to be most disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic were surgical training (95%), clinical activity (94%), and in-person interaction with consultants in the out-patient department (94%) and operating room (85%). In contrast, trainees found an increase in didactic teaching activities (75%) and research activities (39%). Overall, 78% of the trainees felt that the pandemic had a negative impact on their ophthalmology training. The aspects which were most frequently found to be negatively impacted by the pandemic were mental health (70%), followed by technical skills (69%), and clinical skills (61%). No major differences were found on the impact of COVID-19 on training when compared across year levels and across institutions compared by location (National Capital Region vs. non-National Capital Region) and funding type (government vs. private funding). Ninety-nine percent (99%) of institutions shifted most of their didactic teaching activities to online platforms. Surgical video conferences and simulator training or skills labs were thought to be helpful to surgical training by 89% and 81% of the trainees, respectively. Majority of trainees attended to patients via telemedicine averaging 40% of their clinic consults. However, only 16% reported confidence in handling their patients through telemedicine. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic has had an overall negative impact on ophthalmology training in the Philippines. It caused significant disruption in trainees' clinical and surgical activities, and affected their mental health. Despite this, the situation provided an opportunity to boost trainees' theoretical knowledge. Majority are receptive to new technology-based learning tools to preserve the effectiveness of their training. Efforts to re-evaluate current training programs are needed to ensure sustainability and quality of ophthalmology training in the Philippines.
COVID-19 ; ophthalmology ; survey