1.THE INFLUENCE TO BONE FORMATION OF DIFFERENT SOURCES OF PERIOSTEAL GRAFT
Sheng TAO ; Boxun ZHANG ; Shibi LU
Medical Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army 1982;0(01):-
Periosteal autograft from different sources have been used to repair 1 5cm bone defects of radius in 10 rabbits.On the left side,sharp dissected grafts were implanted and the animals were sacrificed 4,8,14,30 and 60 days after operation.Bone formation was studied with X ray and histologic technique.The results showed that the way of sharp dissecting can preserve the periosteum completely,and good bone formation was found in this group.It suggested that the sharp dissecting of the periosteum is the important key for periosteal graft.
2.THE INFLUENCE TO BONE FORMATION OF DIFFERENT SOURCES OF PERIOSTEAL GRAFT
Sheng TAO ; Boxun ZHANG ; Shibi LU
Medical Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army 2001;26(1):74-75
Periosteal autograft from different sources have been used to repair 1.5cm bone defects of radius in 10 rabbits.On the left side,sharp-dissected grafts were implanted and the animals were sacrificed 4,8,14,30 and 60 days after operation.Bone formation was studied with X-ray and histologic technique.The results showed that the way of sharp-dissecting can preserve the periosteum completely,and good bone formation was found in this group.It suggested that the sharp-dissecting of the periosteum is the important key for periosteal graft.
3.Factors Impacting Whereabouts and Referral in Patients with Acute Stroke after Discharge
Jianying TU ; Xiaoshu REN ; Boxun LU
Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice 2017;23(1):106-109
Objective To study the selection of the follow-up care and related factors in stroke patients after acute treatment in general hospital. Methods A total of 230 acute stroke patients discharged from January to December, 2015, were reviewed. They were classified with age, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, referral options, etc., and the key consideration in the selection were compared. Results There were 125 patients needing referral. Referral increased while mRS worsening (P<0.05). The demand for the continuation of rehabilita-tion was higher in the patients with mRS scores of 0-1 and 2-3 than that of 4-5 (F=4.300, P<0.05), but the latter cared more about medical quality (F=3.464, P<0.05) and hospitalization length (F=3.692, P<0.05). The patients more than 80 years old cared more about medical qual-ity (F=4.630, P<0.05). The patients selecting continuous treatment in our hospital paid more attention on continuation (F=7.590, P<0.001), while those selecting rehabilitation institutions cared more about rehabilitation capacity (F=32.156, P<0.001), and those selecting communi-ty hospitals or nursing home cared more about hospitalization length (F=18.823, P<0.001), easy to visit (F=14.070, P<0.001), etc. Referral information mainly came from the doctors (72.0%), only 28.0% from the patients. Conclusion Severity of disability, age and the prognosis may impact the choice for the following rehabilitation in acute stroke patients. Doctors can do more for reasonable referral recommendations to the patients.