Bone-modifying agents currently include bisphosphonates and desumumab, which are the main drugs for the treatment of malignant tumor bone metastasis, hypercalcemia and osteoporosis. Due to its wide clinical application, the adverse events of this kind of drugs are gradually increasing and affecting the quality of life of patients. Therefore, it needs to arouse the attention of the majority of medical personnel. Based on the substantial evidence, the expert committee has thoroughly discussed the management of adverse reactions of bone modifying agents and put forward reasonable suggestions, to guide clinicians in the safety management of such drugs.
Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects* ; Consensus ; Diphosphonates/adverse effects* ; Humans ; Osteoporosis/drug therapy* ; Quality of Life ; Safety Management

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the influence and safety of denosumab on bone mineral density (BMD) of lumbar spine in women with low bone mass.

METHODSThe clinical literatures concerning denosumab for the treatment of osteopenia or osteoporosis in women were searched from Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Wanfang database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure database, Chinese Biomedical Database. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) were selected by the inclusive and exclusive criteria. The jadad scale was used in the quality assessment of included studies. Meta-analysis of valid data picked from included studies was performed by RevMan 5.0.24 software.

RESULTS5 RCT were included in this meta-analysis. The results of meta-analysis using the fixed effects model showed that, the increase level of lumbar BMD after 12 month was 5.45% (95% CI, 5.05%~5.84%) higher in denosumab group than in placebo control group (P<0.00001). The serious adverse event, serious infection event and pack pain occurred during the followed-up were analysed using fixed effects model. The results showed no significant difference between two groups.

CONCLUSIONCompared with placebo control group, denosumab can significant increase the BMD of lumbar spine, and the safety of two groups is similar.

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ; adverse effects ; pharmacology ; Bone Density ; drug effects ; Bone Density Conservation Agents ; adverse effects ; pharmacology ; Denosumab ; Female ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a serious side effect of bone-modifying agents and inhibits angiogenesis agents. Although the pathogenesis of MRONJ is not entirely clear, multiple factors may be involved in specific microenvironments. The TGF-β1 signalling pathway may have a key role in the development of MRONJ. According to the clinical stage, multiple variables should be considered when selecting the most appropriate treatment. Therefore, the prevention and management of treatment of MRONJ should be conducted in patient-centred multidisciplinary team collaborative networks with oncologists, dentists and dental specialists. This would comprise a closed responsibility treatment loop with all benefits directed to the patient. Thus, in the present review, we aimed to summarise the pathogenesis, risk factors, imaging features, clinical staging, therapeutic methods, prevention and treatment strategies associated with MRONJ, which may provide a reference that can inform preventive strategies and improve the quality of life for patients in the future.
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/prevention & control* ; Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects* ; Humans ; Quality of Life ; Risk Factors

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is primarily associated with administering antiresorptive or antiangiogenic drugs. Despite significant research on MRONJ, its pathogenesis and effective treatments are still not fully understood. Animal models can be used to simulate the pathophysiological features of MRONJ, serving as standardized in vivo experimental platforms to explore the pathogenesis and therapies of MRONJ. Rodent models exhibit excellent effectiveness and high reproducibility in mimicking human MRONJ, but classical methods cannot achieve a complete replica of the pathogenesis of MRONJ. Modified rodent models have been reported with improvements for better mimicking of MRONJ onset in clinic. This review summarizes representative classical and modified rodent models of MRONJ created through various combinations of systemic drug induction and local stimulation and discusses their effectiveness and efficiency. Currently, there is a lack of a unified assessment system for MRONJ models, which hinders a standard definition of MRONJ-like lesions in rodents. Therefore, this review comprehensively summarizes assessment systems based on published peer-review articles, including new approaches in gross observation, histological assessments, radiographic assessments, and serological assessments. This review can serve as a reference for model establishment and evaluation in future preclinical studies on MRONJ.
Animals ; Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/drug therapy* ; Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects* ; Diphosphonates/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Reproducibility of Results ; Rodentia

Aged ; Bone Density Conservation Agents ; adverse effects ; Female ; Humans ; Organometallic Compounds ; adverse effects ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal ; drug therapy ; Stevens-Johnson Syndrome ; chemically induced ; diagnosis ; physiopathology ; Thiophenes ; adverse effects

BACKGROUNDThe association of long-term bisphosphonate treatment for osteoporosis and related safety problems such as atypical fractures were not clearly defined. This study was to evaluate the structural, densitometric and biomechanical properties of the prolonged bisphosphonate-loaded bones.

METHODSBone mineral density (BMD) at hip and femoral midshaft, bone cross-sectional area, moment of inertia of both femurs, bone formation and resorption biochemical markers were compared between 28 elderly with at least 4 years of bisphosphonate treatment from 2002 through 2006 and age-matched group of 37 elderly.

RESULTSThe total hip BMD and t-score were found not different between two groups. However, bisphosphonate treated patients were found to have significantly lower bone mineral content in the femoral shaft (P < 0.05); morphological study showed lower cross-sectional area in subtrochanteric and mid-diaphyseal region and thus significantly lower moment of inertia (P < 0.01). High resolution-peripheral quantitative computed tomography showed significantly decreased trabecular density, bone volume ratio, trabecular number but increased trabecular spacing in tibia and distal radius. Finite element analysis further confirmed significantly lower stiffness and failure load in tibia. Biochemical studies also showed lower bone resorption and severely suppressed bone formation activity (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONSThe unchanged total hip BMD between two groups confirmed the beneficial effects of bisphosphonate on trabecular bone, thus preventing osteoporotic fractures at large in previous studies. However, the inferior structural, densitometric and biomechanical properties at cortical bones, especially femur midshaft, need a special attention to look into the association between long-term bisphosphonate intake and the occurrence of stress fractures. When patients taking bisphosphonate complain of proximal thigh pain or discomfort, plain X-ray film can be the first line screening. All patients prescribed with bisphosphonate should be informed of such a complication though we must stress its rarity.

Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Bone Density ; drug effects ; Bone Density Conservation Agents ; adverse effects ; Bone Remodeling ; drug effects ; Densitometry ; Diphosphonates ; adverse effects ; Female ; Finite Element Analysis ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; RANK Ligand ; blood

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the pathological characteristics of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) specimens after jaw curettage or jaw osteotomy treatment and to comprehensively analyze the relationship between the different pathological features, treatment methods, and treatment effects to provide new ideas for effective treatment of MRONJ in clinical work. METHODS: The clinical and pathological data were collected from 23 patients with MRONJ who were treated with curettage (18 patients) and jaw osteotomy (5 patients) at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of Peking University Hospital of Stomatology between June 2014 and December 2015. The pathological characteristics of MRONJ were summarized and analyzed with treatment effects based on various surgical treatment methods. The diagnostic criteria and disease staging of MRONJ were determined according to the 2014 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon's Position Paper. RESULTS: In this study, 5 patients have treated with jaw segmental osteotomy, and all of them were in stage Ⅲ; the other 18 patients were treated with jaw curettage, including 5 patients in stage Ⅱ and 13 patients in stage Ⅲ. The pathological features of MRONJ in five cases of jaw segmental osteotomy were divided into three adjacent regions from shallow to deep: inflammation region (IR), sclerosis region (SR), and bone remodeling layer (BRL). Moreover, three types of pathological features of specimens from traditional curettage were defined as type 1 (IR), type 2 (IR + SR), and type 3 (IR + SR + BRL). The pathological features of the patients treated with jaw curettage were: type Ⅰ, 38.9% (7/18); type Ⅱ, 44.4% (8/18); type Ⅲ, 16.7% (3/18). Complete healing was achieved in 5 patients treated with jaw segmental osteo-tomy. Moreover, 2 cases with type Ⅰ, 1 case with type Ⅱ, and 1 with type Ⅲ completely healed after jaw curettage, while 5 cases with type Ⅰ, 7 cases with type Ⅱ, and 2 cases with type Ⅲ experienced recurrence after surgery. CONCLUSION Pathological features of continuous regions of inflammation, sclerosis, and bone remodeling layer were identified from shallow to deep, based on the microscopic observation of jaw segmental osteotomy samples. Insufficient removal of the sclerotic region during jaw curettage that blocks the required blood, nutritional factors, and mesenchymal stem cells seems to be a common cause for failed treatment of MRONJ after curettage surgery.
Humans ; Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology* ; Sclerosis/complications* ; Wound Healing ; Treatment Outcome ; Inflammation/complications* ; Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects* ; Diphosphonates/adverse effects*

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of risedronate sodium in treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, one-year randomized, double blind clinical trial was performed among 54 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. The changes were compared in bone mineral density (BMD), bone metabolism markers and adverse events after 12 months oral administration of risedronate sodium. BMD was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptionmetry (DEXA) and bone turnover marker was detected. The results showed that there was a significant increase in BMD of the lumbar spine (3.29% +/- 1.18%, 4.51% +/- 1.64% respectively) after 6 and 12 months in the risedronate treatment group versus placebo control group (-0.62% +/- 0.24%, 0.48% +/- 0.18% respectively). Bone turnover was decreased to a stable nadir over 6 and 12 months for resorption markers [N-Telopeptide (NTx), P < 0.05] and over 12 months for formation marker (ALP, P < 0.05; BGP, P < 0.05). The safety profile of risedronate sodium was similar to that of placebo. There were no trends toward increased frequency of any adverse experience except for gastrointestinal symptoms (7.1%), rash (7.1%) and hematuria (3.6%), which were usually mild, transient, and resolved with continued treatment. It was concluded that risedronate was an efficacious and safe drug in treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Alkaline Phosphatase/blood ; Alkaline Phosphatase/drug effects ; Bone Density ; Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects ; Bone Density Conservation Agents/*therapeutic use ; Double-Blind Method ; Etidronic Acid/adverse effects ; Etidronic Acid/*analogs & derivatives ; Etidronic Acid/therapeutic use ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/*drug therapy ; Safety

No abstract available.
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/*drug therapy ; Bone Density Conservation Agents/*therapeutic use ; *Decision Support Techniques ; Female ; Glucocorticoids/*adverse effects ; Humans ; Osteoporosis/*chemically induced/*prevention & control

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a severe complication of bisphosphonates (BPs) or other targeted agent therapies. MRONJ appears as exposed bone, pus, and swelling in the oral and maxillofacial regions. However, neither surgery nor conservative therapy can eliminate symptoms thoroughly. In addition to BPs, several antiresorptive and antiangiogenic agents, such as denosumab and bevacizumab, as well as targeted agents, such as sunitinib and temsirolimus, can cause osteonecrosis of  the  jaw according to the literature. This review aims to summarize the research progress on these new drugs.
Angiogenesis Inhibitors ; therapeutic use ; Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw ; drug therapy ; Bone Density Conservation Agents ; adverse effects ; Denosumab ; therapeutic use ; Diphosphonates ; Humans