Introduction: Researchers Herbert Schwabl and Cecile Vennos highlight Tibetan medicine’s significance, noting that Gabur-25 was registered in Switzerland as Padma-28 in 1977. This formula is used internationally for improving blood circulation and treating heart pain, limb numbness, skin discoloration, ulcers, chronic inflammation, tinnitus, and dizziness. The primary ingredient in Padma-28 is Gabur-25.
The framework “Mkhan Chen Chos Kyi Rgyal Po’i Gsung ‘Bum Las Nyer Lnga’i Sde Tshan,” written by Mongolian healer Lama Gegeen Luvsandanzanjantsan (1639–1704), compiles 30 medicinal formulas, each containing 25 ingredients, including Gabur-25. This study examines its composition, quality, and efficacy. Results: A comparative analysis of Gabur-25 from Luvsandanzanjantsan’s work with compositions from “The Four Tantras of Medicine,” “Abstract of Nandin Erdene Extract,” and “The Four Mineral Waters” revealed 17 shared ingredients and 8 variations. These differences suggest adaptations for treating excessive heat-related conditions, gout, and cerebral palsy disorders. Conclusion Gabur-25 in Luvsandanzanjantsan’s work differs from other sources by seven medicinal ingredients. It is particularly effective for dispersing excess heat, treating gout-related disorders, and aiding paralysis-influenced conditions. This distinction highlights Gabur-25 as a modified formulation tailored to regional ailments based on the author’s experience. The study underscores the evolving nature of traditional Tibetan medicine and its adaptation to specific health conditions.

Introduction: The development of Mongolian traditional medicine (MTM) has historical roots in Indian Ayurvedic and Tibetan medical systems. The Four Medical Tantras significantly influenced MTM’s education, theory, and practice. Disease classifications within the Four Medical Tantras have long been foundational for diagnosis, treatment, and teaching.
Mongolian scholar Lama Gegeen Luvsandanzanjantsan expanded the Four Medical Tantras’ classification system in his seminal work, A Comprehensive Explanation of Disease Differentiation from the Decrees of Khamba Nomun Khan. This study compares disease classifications from this work with the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) specific to Traditional Medicine (TM). Goal: To analyze and compare the disease classifications in A Comprehensive Explanation of Disease Differentiation from the Decrees of Khamba Nomun Khan with ICD-10 TM classifications, providing detailed insights. Methods: The study utilized the following materials:
• Lama Gegeen Luvsandanzanjantsan’s A Comprehensive Explanation of Disease Differentiation from the Decrees of Khamba Nomun Khan.
• ICD-10 classifications of diseases. Research methods included source study, comparative analysis, and systematic categorization. Results: Lama Gegeen Luvsandanzanjantsan authored four volumes comprising 79 sections and 220 chapters, detailing 404 diseases classified by “place,” “cause,” “nature,” and “root.” While aligned with the Four Medical Tantras, his classifications offer deeper specificity, such as diseases caused by combinations of the five vital energies (wind, bile, phlegm, etc.).
This study focused on 101 diseases classified by “place” and 101 by “cause” for comparison. The ICD-10 TM classification system organizes diseases into 15 segments based on diagnostic criteria and etiology. A comparative analysis of the 202 diseases from Lama Gegeen’s text revealed alignment and divergence in categorization principles. Conclusion Lama Gegeen Luvsandanzanjantsan’s “A Comprehensive Explanation of Disease Differentiation” (1639–1704), written in Tibetan, provides an extensive classification of 404 diseases. While the ICD-10 TM system organizes diseases into 15 categories with etiology-based diagnostics, it lacks the detailed elaboration found in Lama Gegeen’s work. Integrating these classification systems could enhance diagnostics, treatment strategies, and research in traditional medicine.