Objective To analyze the causes of misdiagnosis and mistreatment of Dravet syndrome. Methods Patients with Dravet syndrome diagnosed according to clinical features and SCN1A gene mutation detection were recruited within recent 3 years. The patients were grouped into correct diagnosis-treatment group and misdiagnosis-mistreatment group according to whether the patients had ever been misdiagnosed and mistreated by sodium channel blockers. The clinical features were compared between two groups. Results Thirty-five cases with Dravet syndrome were collected and the rate of misdiagnosis reached 40%, Nine cases were misdiagnosed as symptomatic focal epilepsy, 4 as Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and 1 as Doose syndrome. The average age of onset in misdiagnosis-mistreatment group was (5.50 ± 3.56) months,and the age of confirmed diagnosis was (83.57 ± 105.62) months. The percentage of abnormal EEG, onset seizure with partial seizure, the seizure frequency within the first year from onset, onset with afebrile seizure, patients with status epilepticus or cluster seizures was higher in misdiagnosis-mistreatment group but it showed no significant statistical significance when compared with that of correct diagnosis-treatment group. The percentage of patients with mental retardation and focal neurological signs was significantly higher in misdiagnosis-mistreatment group (P=0.005 and 0.002, respectively). Conclusions Dravet syndrome is frequently misdiagnosed as symptomatic focal epilepsy. The appearance of focal neurological signs and mental retardation before confirmed diagnosis are important factors for misdiagnosis. Gene mutation screening will be helpful for differential diagnosis of Dravet syndrome.

Objective To observe the targeted function of a mesothelin antibody modified nanoprobe in human pancreatic cancer BxPC3 cell.Methods The Fe3O4@SiO2 nanoprobe was prepared by St(o)ber method,and then quantum dots (CdTe) and mesothelin antibody was crosslinked to obtain the properties of targeting and fluorescent.Fluorescent nano Fe3O4@SiO2 probes and BxPC3 cells were incubated in vitro for 30 min.Its targeting performance was tested by the CCD imaging system and magnetic separation technology.HepG-2 and K562 cells with low expression of mesothelin were selected as reference cells.Results This preparation method of nanoprobe could produce a uniform and narrow distribution particle with particle size mainly ranging from 120 to 140 nm.The cell adsorption experiments showed that the adsorption efficiency of BxPC3,HepG-2 and K562 by nanoprobe without crosslinking antibody were less than 20％,as a non-specific adsorption; and the adsorption efficiency of BxPC3,HepG-2 and K562 by crosslinking mesothelin antibody nanoprobe were (53.9 ± 1.8) ％,(8.0 ± 2.1) ％ and (8.9 ± 2.3) ％ respectively,and the adsorption capacity with BxPC3 was significantly increased.Conclusions The nanoprobe modified by mesothelin antibody can effectively recognize BxPC3 cells which highly expressing mesothelin.

Objective: To explore the evaluation of joint injury by HEAD-US-C (Hemophilic Early Arthropathy Detection with UltraSound in China, HEAD-US-C) in patients with moderate or severe hemophilia A treated with prophylaxis vs on-demand. Methods: The patients from June 2015 to July 2017 with moderate or severe hemophilia A were examined by ultrasound imaging of the elbows, knees and ankles; Meanwhile the HEAD-US-C ultrasound assessment scale and hemophilia joint health score scale 2.1 (HJHS2.1) were used to score the joint status. The correlation between the HEAD-US-C and HJHS score was performed in prophylaxis group and on-demand group patients, respectively. Results: A total of 925 cases of joint ultrasonography were conducted in 70 patients with moderate or severe hemophilia A. Among patients with moderate hemophilia, the median (IQR) of HEAD-US-C score and HJHS score in on-demand group were significantly higher than those in the prophylaxis group[1 (0, 6) vs 0.5 (0, 3) , z=0.177, P=0.046],[2 (0, 4) vs 2 (0, 3) z=0.375, P=0.007], even though there was no significant difference of the median (IQR) number of annualized target joints bleeding episodes between on-demand and prophylaxis groups[1 (0, 7) vs 1 (0, 5) , z=1.271, P=0.137]. Unlike in moderate cases, on-demand treatment group had more annualized target joints bleeding episodes than prophylaxis group among patients with severe hemophilia[3 (0, 8) vs 2 (0, 8) , z=0.780 P=0.037]. The prophylaxis group compared favorably with on-demand therapy group in terms of HEAD-US-C score[1 (0, 6) vs 4 (0, 7) , z=2.189, P=0.008], and HJHS score[2 (0, 5) , 4 (1, 6) , z=3646, P<0.001]for the severe hemophilia patients. The positive correlation between HEAD-US-C score and HJHS score was identified (P<0.05) , whether on-demand treatment or prophylaxis groups. The correlation coefficient between HEAD-US-C score and HJHS score in on-demand treatment and prophylaxis groups were 0.739 (95% CI 0.708-0.708) , 0.865 (95% CI 0.848-0.848) respectively, and 95% CI didn’t overlap (P<0.05) , indicating that the correlation coefficient in prophylaxis group had stronger correlation than that in on-demand group. Conclusions Clinical effects of prophylaxis were significantly better than those of on-demand treatment in patients with moderate or se-vere haemophilia A. HEAD-US-C scoring system could effectively evaluate joints damage in hemophilia A patients treated with on-demand or prophylaxis, companied by significantly positive correlation with HJHS clinical evaluation system, and provided objective index for clinical effect assessment.

Objective: To assess the feasibility of HEAD-US scale in the clinical application of hemophilic arthropathy (HA) and propose an optimized ultrasound scoring system. Methods: From July 2015 to August 2017, 1 035 joints ultrasonographic examinations were performed in 91 patients. Melchiorre, HEAD-US (Hemophilic Early Arthropathy Detection with UltraSound) and HEAD-US-C (HEAD-US in China) scale scores were used respectively to analyze the results. The correlations between three ultrasound scales and Hemophilia Joint Health Scores (HJHS) were evaluated. The sensitivity differences of the above Ultrasonic scoring systems in evaluation of HA were compared. Results: All the 91 patients were male, with median age of 16 (4-55) years old, including 86 cases of hemophilia A and 5 cases hemophilia B. The median (P₂₅, P₇₅) of Melchiorre, HEAD-US and HEAD-US-C scores of 1 035 joints were 2(0,6), 1(0,5) and 2(0,6), respectively, and the correlation coefficients compared with HJHS was 0.747, 0.762 and 0.765 respectively, with statistical significance (P<0.001). The positive rates of Melchiorre, HEAD-US-C and HEAD-US scale score were 63.0% (95%CI 59.7%-65.9%), 59.5% (95%CI 56.5%-62.4%) and 56.6% (95%CI 53.6%-59.6%) respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). Even for 336 cases of asymptomatic joints, the positive rates of Melchiorre, HEAD-US-C and HEAD-US scale score were 25.0% (95%CI 20.6%-29.6%), 17.0% (95%CI 12.6%-21.1%) and 11.9% (95%CI 8.4%-15.7%) respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). There were significant changes (P<0.05) in the ultrasonographic score of HA before and after onset of hemorrhage in 107 joints of 40 patients. The difference in variation amplitude of HEAD-US-C scores and HEAD-US scores before and after joint bleeding was statistically significant (P<0.001). Conclusion Compared with Melchiorre, there were similar good correlations between HEAD-US, HEAD-US-C and HJHS. HEAD-US ultrasound scoring system is quick, convenient and simple to use. The optimized HEAD-US-C scale score is more sensitive than HEAD-US, especially for patients with HA who have subclinical state, which make up for insufficiency of sensitivity in HEAD-US scoring system

OBJECTIVETo investigate the characteristics of ultrasonography in haemophilic arthropathy in knee joints.

METHODSThe knee joints (n=135) of 68 patients with haemophilia A (n=59) or haemophilia B (n=9) were consecutively evaluated with ultrasonography and scored according to MELCHIORRE ultrasound score. The correlations between ultrasound score and the number of knee joint bleeding episodes, age, and World Federation Haemophilic orthopedic (WFHO) score were studied.

RESULTS68 male patients with median age 20 (3-48) years old were enrolled in this study. The prevalences of hydrops articuli, fibrotic septa, synovial hypertrophy, synovial hypertrophy with angiogenesis, haemosiderin deposition were 39.2% (53/135), 3.0% (4/135), 77.0% (104/135), 49.6% (67/135), 37.8% (51/135), respectively; and the prevalences of cartilage damage, bone erosion, bone remodeling, osteophytes were 63.7% (86/135), 48.1% (65/135), 3.0% (4/135), 13.3% (18/135) respectively. The average ultrasound score was 5.21[95% CI (4.50-5.93)]. The ultrasound score of knees joints according to age 0-6, 7-18 and > 18 years old groups were 0.63[95% CI (0.15-1.10)], 2.88[95% CI (1.90-3.85)], 7.83[95% CI (7.07-8.60)], respectively; and the difference among groups was statistically significant (P<0.01). The significant difference of ultrasound score was not found among moderate, mild and severe haemophilia (F=0.90, P=0.914). A significant positive correlation between ultrasound and WFHO scores was demonstrated (r=0.745, P<0.01). The ultrasound score increased significantly with the increase of number of knee bleed Episodes (F=49.926, P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONThe main characteristics of ultrasonography of haemophilic arthropathy in knee joints were identified as followings: synovial hypertrophy, cartilage damage, bone erosion, hydrops articuli, and haemosiderin deposition. Ultrasonography was a fast, effective, safe, and available inspection method in assessment of haemophilic arthropathy.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Hemophilia A ; complications ; Hemophilia B ; complications ; Humans ; Joint Diseases ; diagnostic imaging ; etiology ; Knee Joint ; diagnostic imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Ultrasonography ; Young Adult