1.Influence of international cooperation on teachers professional development
Bilegsaikhan P ; Myagmartseren D ; Oyungoo B ; Bolormaa O
Innovation 2019;13(1):46-49
Background:
In accordance with the development of a rapid pace of modern medical
science, requirements for the scholars and teachers of universities that provide the medical
professionals throughout the world increase every year and there is an urging demand for the
scholars and teachers to develop themselves continuously.
Methods:
In order to assess the influence of the cooperation on the teacher’s development,
we chose 43 teachers who participated in professional development training of the Yonsei
university by using non-probabilistic collection method.
Results:
77,19 % of the study participant teachers responded that professional development
training greatly influenced to their teaching skills improvement. 19,3 % responded that it was
well influenced, and 3.51% responded as slightly influenced. The majority of the participants
or 43,86% responded that the professionaly training greatly influenced to their clinical aid and
service skill improvement. 36,84% responded as well influenced,12.28 % responded as moderely
influenced, 3.51 % responded as slightly influenced and 3.51% responded.The question of
how the training influenced for their improvement of scientific research, 3% responded as not
influenced at all, 11 % responded as slightly influenced, 30 % respoded as well inflienced and
56% responded as greatly influenced.
Conclusion
The participants responded to the question on how the training has influenced
on professional development training as greatly influenced to their teaching skills improvement.
As teachers from the branch universities who participated in the study have a statistical
significance. (p=0,04)
2.Захын Цусан Дахь Мононуклеар Цагаан Эсийн Хавдар Устгах Идэвхийг Шугаман Эсийн Загварт Тодорхойлсон Дүн
Nemekhbayar B ; Gantulga D ; Azzaya D ; Batchimeg Ts ; Erdenesaikhan T ; Baigalmaa B ; Bilegsaikhan D ; Munkhbat B
Journal of Oriental Medicine 2015;8(1):24-29
Introduction: Cancer arises from abnormal cells nonstop divide in an
uncontrolled way and without stopping. In GLOBOCAN reported that 14.1
million new cancer cases, 8.2 million cancer deaths and 32.6 million
people suffering with cancer in 2012 worldwide. Among the world, a
surgical, radiation and chemotherapy maintains the cancer treatment
within their combination, and moreover, scientists believe that, in order
to enhance the result and come up with better spotlight therapeutic
outcome, immunotherapy should be added within combination of
surgical, radiation and chemotherapy. Objective: To identify the immune
ability of mononuclear cells in peripheral blood, and to study their
cytolytic activity on cancer cellular line. Materials and method: Cytolytic
activity assay was done with healthy human's PBMCs induced by non
specific mytogen phytohemaglutinin L (PHA) of 10ul/ml, 5ul/ml, 2.5ul/ml
dosage, and cultured with SP2Myeloma cell line. Then live cells and death
cells analyzed with MTT assay and Propidium iodide, respectively, as well
as CD+25 cells analyzed with Apogee flow cytometry at 24.48 and 72
hours of uncubation at 5% CO2, 37 C0. Result: Cancer Inhibition rate of
mononuclear cells in blood (inhibition rate %) was assessed by МТТ assay
and the culture of control group of mononuclear cells and myeloma cells’
median was (OD=0.36±0.05) while Phytohemaglutinin induced group’s
result in 72 hours was (OD=0.31±0.03) which suggests that linear cells
mononuclear cell’s mixture rate is 86.1%. Dead cell’s number assessed by
Propidiumiodid (Cell toxicity assay) shows the result of control group’s
cell death (10.68±2.1%), while Phytohemaglutinin induced group it was
20-25% which is statistically significant. (p<0.05). Cancer elimination
activity assessed by СD25+ Т cells and the result of CD25+ Т number
activated by Phytohemaglutinin (152-282 cell/µl), in control group
(26cell/µl) which is statistically significant(p<0.001). Conclusion: 1.
Myeloma SP2/0 cell line is inhibited the growth by peripheral
mononuclear cells and it is not dependent dosage of Phytohemaglutinin.
2. Death of cell assessed by propidium iodide, control group’s cell death
10.68±2.1%, while Phytohemaglutinin induced group it was 20-25% which
is statistically significant (p<0.05). 3. Cancer elimination activation
assessed by СD25+ Т cells shows the result of CD25+ Т number activated
by Phytohemaglutinin (152-282cell/µl), in control group (26cell/µl) which
is statistically significant(p<0.001).