Objective To investigate the early diagnostic value of high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein(hs‐CRP) ,D‐dimer and cTnI in ACS .Methods All the 83 blood samples of patients with chest pain in the emergency department of our hospital were enrolled in the study ,and 30 healthy people were recruited as the control group .According to the final clinical diagnosis ,29 patients were grouped into non‐ischemic chest pain(NICP) group and 54 patients were grouped into ACS group .Venous blood samples were col‐lected and the concentrations of serum hs‐CRP ,cTnI ,plasma D‐dimer were measured .The diagnostic value of the 3 indicators and their combined test for ACS was evaluated by using the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve and Youden index .Results The levels of hs‐CRP ,cTnI and D‐dimer in ACS group were significantly higher than those of the control group and the NICP group (P<0 .05) .The levels of hs‐CRP and D‐dimer in ACS group were significantly higher than those of the NICP group(P<0 .05) . ROC showed that the area under urve of hs‐CRP ,D‐dimer and cTnI were 0 .564 ,0 .631 and 0 .639 respectively .The sensitivity ,spe‐cificity and accuracy of the combined detection of hs‐CRP ,cTnI and D‐dimer were 88 .1% ,58 .7% ,53 .2% respectively . Conclusion To some extent ,the levels of hs‐CRP ,cTnI and D‐dimer all could be used as indicators in the diagnosis of ACS .But combined detection of hs‐CRP ,cTnI and D‐dimer could improve the sensitivity and specificity ,and had value to guide clinical diagno‐sis of ACS in the early stage .

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of using anti‐cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti‐CCP) antibody or rheumatoid factor(RF) as the single laboratory parameter for rheumatoid arthritis(RA) diagnosis ,versus to using the two parameters in com‐bination .Methods A total of 56 cases of patients with RA were enrolled into RA group ,other 34 cases of patients with out RA were enrolled into non‐RA group .Levels of anti‐CCP antibody and RF were detected by using electro‐chemiluminescence immunoas‐say(ECLIA)and compared between the two groups .And the diagnostic efficacy of single and combined detection of anti‐CCP anti‐body and RF were evaluated .Results The levels of anti‐CCP antibody and RF in the RA group were higher than those in the non‐RA group ,had statistically significant differences(P<0 .05) .In diagnosis of RA ,the areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC)curve of anti‐CCP antibody and RF were 0 .925 and 0 .822 respectively .The sensitivity and specificity of anti‐CCP antibody were both higher than those of RF .Compared with single detection of anti‐CCP antibody ,there was no significant increase of sensi‐tivity in using anti‐CCP antibody/RF ,whereas the specificity dropped significantly .Combined detection of anti‐CCP antibody and RF ,compared with single detection of anti‐CCP antibody ,had significantly lower sensitivity ,but no significant changes were found in specificity .Conclusion Single detection of anti‐CCP antibody is more effective than RF for diagnosing RA ,while combined detec‐tion of anti‐CCP antibody and RF could not significantly improve the specificity and sensitivity .It is suggested to only use anti‐CCP antibody for diagnosis of RA .