Objective To evaluate the optimal time of the use of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation on the patients with acute exacerbation of COPD(AECOPD).Methods 131 patients were divided at random conventional therapy group(control group)and conventional therapy plus NIPPV group,the patients of NIPPV group were again divided into PaCO2≥9.31 kPa,7.98～

Objective To investigate the correlation between esophageal motility abnormalities and the characteristics of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with different subtypes of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (rGERD).Methods From September 2015 to May 2016,a total of 100 rGERD patients were collected,all of whom received gastroendoscopy examination,high resolution manometry (HRM) and 24 h impedance-pH monitoring.According to the results of gastroendoscopy examination,the patients were divided into refractory non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) group and refractory reflux esophagitis (RE) group.Abnormal esophageal motility and pathological gastroesophageal reflux of each group were analyzed.Chi-square test,t test and sum-rank test were performed for comparison,the correlation factors were analyzed by multivariate unconditional Logistic regression.Results Among the 100 patients with rGERD,there were 83 cases in refractory NERD group and 17 in refractory RE group.The episodes of weak acid and gas-liquid mixed reflux of refractory NERD group were both significantly higher than those of refractory RE group (80.2±56.9 vs 44.8± 13.7,56.0± 25.6 vs 25.2±16.1);and the differences were statistically significant (t=3.202 and 2.229,both P＜ 0.05).The DeMeester score,acid reflux episodes and the percentage of reflux time of refractory NERD group were all significantly lower than those of refractory RE group (24.2±8.5 vs 56.8±3.0,21.4± 11.8 vs 35.9 ± 32.6,(7.1 ± 1.6) ％ vs (16.2 ± 8.8) ％),and the differences were statistically significant (t=-2.820,-2.230 and-2.604;all P＜0.05).However,the average resting pressure of lower esophageal sphincter was higher than that of refractory RE group ((7.9±5.6) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) vs (4.5±2.2) mmHg),and the difference was statistically significant (t=2.443,P＜0.05).Patients with esophageal motility disorders of refractory NERD group and refractory RE group were 58 cases (69.9 ％) and 12 cases (12/17),respectively,and the difference was not significant (P＞0.05).Compared with refractory RE group,the ratio of intermittent contraction was higher (1/17 vs 26.5％,22/83) and the peristaltic contraction disorder was lower in refractory NERD group (11/17 vs 43.4％,36/83);and the differences were statistically significant (x2 =3.389 and 2.587,both P ＜ 0.05).The results of multivariate non-conditional Logistic regression analysis showed that intermittent contraction and gas reflux were risk factors of the incidence of pathological weak acid reflux (odd ratio (OR) =3.139 and 1.254,both P＜0.05),while body mass index and gas-liquid mixed reflux were the risk factors of the occurrence of pathological acid reflux (OR =1.302 and 1.026,both P＜ 0.05),whereas the distal contractile integral was a protective factor (OR=0.998,P＜0.05).Conclusion Esophageal dysmotility is common in patients with rGERD,and the dysmotility disorders are different in patients with different subtypes,which may be related to the different reflux characteristics.

Objective To analyze the relationship between body type,age,gender,esophageal motility function,lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) and clinical classification and type of reflux contents of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).Methods From September 2015 to July 2016,at Beijing Tongren Hospital of China Capital Medical University,the results of 24-hour esophageal impedance-pH monitoring of 141 patients with GERD were retrospectively analyzed.The differences of reflux contents were compared in patients with GERD among different body type,age,gender,esophageal motility function,LESP and clinical classification.Mann-Whitney test was performed for comparison between groups.Results Acid reflux was more common in obese patients (body mass index more than 23.9 kg/m2) compared with patients with normal body type (body mass index from 18.5 to 23.9 kg/m2) (18.5,7.0 to 45.3 vs.10.0,2.0 to 32.0),and the difference was statistically significant (Z =-2.320,P =0.020).Patients under 65 years old had more numbers of weak acid reflux,non-acid reflux and gas reflux than patients over 65 years old (58.5,32.8 to95.0 vs.40.0,24.0to71.0;19.5,6.0to47.5 vs.8.0,3.0 to19.0;46.0,23.8to79.3 vs.35.0,11.0 to 56.0),and the differences were statistically significant (Z =-2.690,-3.286 and-2.091,all P＜0.05).Male patients had more gas and mixed reflux compared with female patients (53.5,24.0 to 122.8 vs.36.0,19.0 to 67.0;34.0,20.8 to 50.0 vs.27.0,14.0 to 43.0),and the differences were statistically significant (Z =-2.424 and-1.961,both P ＜ 0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in reflux contents between patients with normal esophageal motility and patients with esophageal motility disorder (weak or interrupted peristalsis) (all P ＞ 0.05).Patients with reflux esophagitis(RE) and/or Barrett's esophagus (BE) had more weak acid reflux,non-acid reflux and gas reflux compared with patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) (61.0,31.3 to 102.5 vs.44.0,24.5 to 66.5;18.0,8.0 to 36.5 vs.8.0,2.0 to 22.0;49.5,27.5 to 86.5 vs.26.0,11.0 to 47.0),and the differences were statistically significant (Z =-2.585,-2.942 and-3.278,all P ＜ 0.05).Patients with lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation were more likely to have weak acid reflux than patients with normal LES function (57.0,32.3 to 87.0 vs.40.0,21.0 to 73.0),the difference was statistically significant (Z =-2.065,P =0.039).Conclusion Body type,age,gender,LESP and clinical classification are related to type of reflux contents in GERD patients,while esophageal peristalsis is irrelevant.

Objective:To explore the quality of life and psychological factors of patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (rGERD).Methods:From September 2016 to March 2019, 159 rGERD patients visiting the Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Tongren Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University were retrospectively selected. According to the presence or absence of distal esophageal mucosal injury under gastroscopy, the patients were divided into refractory reflux esophagitis (RE) group (58 cases) and refractory non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) group (101 cases). The general data, the results of 24 h esophageal impedance pH, esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) and the scores of gatroesophageal reflux disease-questionnaire (GerdQ), 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36), self-rating anxiety scale(SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) were recorded and compared between the two groups. Independent sample t test, rank sum test, chi-square test and multiple linear regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. Results:There were no significant differences in gender, age, abdominal circumference or body mass index between the two groups (all P>0.05). The incidence of extraesophageal symptoms of refractory NERD group was higher than that of refractory RE group (45.5%, 46/101 vs. 24.1%, 14/58), and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=7.185, P=0.010). The episodes of gas reflux, weak-acid reflux and non-acid reflux were all more than those of refractory RE group (66.20 times, 45.20 times to 111.60 times vs. 38.40 times, 23.50 times to 59.63 times; 34.70 times, 9.05 times to 52.75 times vs. 6.35 times, 3.10 times to 24.00 times; 12.60 times, 2.15 times to 24.20 times vs. 2.15 times, 0 times to 10.30 times), GerdQ score of refractory NERD group was higher than that of refractory RE group (8.9±2.5 vs. 7.8±2.3), and DeMeester score, the symptom index and symptom association probability of refractory NERD group were all lower than those of refractory RE group (5.16, 1.75 to 14.48 vs. 15.19, 2.78 to 45.96; 33.3%, 0 to 60.0% vs. 57.5%, 40.5% to 78.0%; 87.8%, 0 to 97.8% vs. 94.0%, 82.7% to 98.2%); and the differences were statistically significant ( Z=-5.548, -5.384 and -4.338, t=3.306, Z=-2.607, -4.313 and -2.468; all P<0.05). The esophageal distal contractile integral of refractory NERD group was lower than that of refractory RE group (334.0 mmHg·s·cm, 182.5 mmHg·s·cm to 492.0 mmHg·s·cm vs. 399.0 mmHg·s·cm, 216.5 mmHg·s·cm to 756.3 mmHg·s·cm, 1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), and the difference was statistically significant ( Z=-2.204, P=0.030). There were no significant differences in lower escophageal sphincter or the length of peristaltic interruption between the two groups (both P>0.05). There were no significant differences in physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, mental health or reported health transition of SF-36 score between refractory NERD group and refractory RE group (all P>0.05). Among 159 patients with rGERD, 98 patients (61.6%) had anxiety and 55 patients (34.6%) had depression. The SAS score of refractory NERD group was higher than that of refractory RE Group (52.6±5.8 vs. 47.0±8.8), and the difference was statistically significant ( t=4.794, P<0.05), however there was no significant difference in SDS score between the two groups ( P>0.05). The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that GerdQ score in rGERD patients was positively correlated with DeMeester score, gas reflux, weak acid reflux, SAS score and SDS score ( r=0.201, 0.228, 0.171, 0.229 and 0.276; all P<0.05). Conclusions:Among the patients with rGERD, the reflux symptoms are more severe in refractory NERD patients, which may be related to non-acid reflux, gas reflux, esophageal motor disorders, and psychological abnormalities, especially anxiety.

Objective: To explore the clinical therapeutic method and effect of the thumb-tack needle for subcutaneous embedding therapy on treating insomnia with insufficiency of heart and spleen among breast cancer patients. Methods: Totally 80 breast cancer patients with insomnia with insufficiency of heart and spleen treated in department of oncology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi′an Jiao Tong University from March 2018 till November 2018 were selected and assigned into an experiment group and a control group by random number table, 40 cases in each one. The experiment group applied thumb-tack needle for subcutaneous embedding therapy, selecting Shenmen, Sanyinjiao, Zusanli, Anmian as major acupoint and Taibai as assistant acupoint. The control group used fake needles at the same places. After four-week treatment, we evaluated the therapeutic effect using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and observed side effects. Results: Before treatment, no significantly statistical differences were observed between the two groups on global and each dimension′s PSQI scores (P>0.05). After treatment, the PSQI scores and PSQI global score of the experiment group on sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, and daytime dysfunction were (1.58±0.53), (1.72±0.33), (1.57±0.64), (1.61±0.68), (1.05±0.42), (1.27±0.53), (8.91±2.73) points respectively, which were (1.86±0.71), (1.90±0.41), (1.85±0.47), (1.97±0.83), (1.42±0.91), (1.56±0.45), (10.86±4.53) points respectively in the control group. There was significant difference between the two groups on PSQI global scores (t=1.998-2.637, P<0.05). The number of patients in the experiment group assessed as clinical cure, obviously effective, effective and noneffective were 8, 13, 9, 10 respectively, which were 1, 5, 12, 22 in the control group respectively. The clinical efficacy showed significant difference between the two groups (χ²=27.68, P<0.01). No side effects, such as infection, needle drop-off and etc. were observed. Conclusions The thumb-tack needle for subcutaneous embedding therapy could improve sleep quality of breast cancer patients with insomnia with insufficiency of heart and spleen, and it′s easy to operate, safe with little side effects.