1.Application of Acupoint Massage Plus Body Massage for Intervention of Premature Pathological Jaundice
Xiaobing ZHAN ; Xiaoming QUAN ; Baogui DENG
Journal of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2017;34(5):690-695
Objective To observe the intervention effect of premature pathological jaundice treated with conventional blue light phototherapy combined with acupoint massage plus body massage. Methods Ninety premature infants with pathological jaundice were randomized into control group 1, control group 2 and observation group, 30 cases in each group. The control group 1 was given blue light phototherapy plus oral use of vitamin B2, the control group 2 was given body massage based on the treatment for the control group 1, and observation group was given acupoint massage based on the treatment for the control group 2, the treatment for the three groups lasting for 7 continuous days. Before and after treatment, the levels of transcutaneous bilirubin (TCB), serum total bilirubin (TB), and serum direct bilirubin (DB) were observed, and then the therapeutic effects on jaundice in the three groups were compared. Results After treatment, the overall therapeutic effect and the daily decline of TCB, TB and DB in the observation group were superior to those in the two control groups, the difference being significant (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). In the control group 2, the post-treatment average decline of TB and the decline of TCB on treatment day 4-7 were superior to those in the control group 1, the difference being significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Acupoint massage plus body massage is effective and safe for the treatment of pathological jaundice in premature infants, and the therapy being simple and practical.
2.Efficacy of Intraoperative Hyperthermic Peritoneal Perfusion on 60 Patients with Advanced Gastric Carcinoma
Hongjie ZHAN ; Han LIANG ; Baogui WANG ; Jingyu DENG ; Xishan HAO
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology 2010;37(4):229-231
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion (CHPP) on advanced gastric carcinoma. Methods: Sixty patients with advanced gastric carcinoma were divided into the control group and the treatment group. All patients underwent radical gastrectomy and D2 node dissection. Patients in the treatment group received CHPP when surgical resection was completed. Patients in the control group underwent resection of gastric carcinoma without CHPP. Chemotherapy was administered with FOLFOX4 regimen intravenously for 12 cycles in both groups at 4 weeks after surgery. The serum Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA19-9 were measured in patients with advanced gastric cancer before and after resection of tumor. Survival and recurrence in both groups were analyzed and compared. Results: The mean levels of the expression of CEA and CA19-9 in the peripheral blood of the 60 patients were significantly higher than the upper limits of normal (55.89±22.25μg/L vs 0~5μg/L; 125.35±61.78 U/mL vs 0~39U/mL P< 0.01). There were no significant differences in the mean levels of the expression of CEA and CA19-9 in the peripheral blood between the treatment group and the control group (54.67±22.95μg/L vs 56.09±22.15μg/L; 126.16±62.45 U/mL vs 123.35±60.88 U/mL,P>0.05). The serum CEA and CA19-9 levels were significantly decreased at 7 days after treatment in the treatment group (7.58±3.21 μg/L, 31.35±13.47 U/mL, P<0.01). The levels of these two tumor markers were decreased unremarkably at 7 days after treatment in the control group (37. 68±20.59μg/L, 98.23±36.28 U/mL, P>0.05). The serum CEA and CA19-9 levels were decreased significantly in both groups at 30 days after surgery (P<0.05). One-year survival and recurrence rates were 83.3% and 10% in the treatment group and 80% and 13.3% in the control group, with no significant differences between the two groups (P>0.05). Three-year survival and recurrence rates were 63.3% and 20% in the treatment group and 40% and 40% in the control group, with a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: Surgical resection combined with CHPP can significantly decrease the serum CEA and CA19-9 levels. Intraoperative CHPP for patients with advanced gastric carcinoma is helpful for preventing peritoneal metastasis and recurrence and can prolong survival time.
3.Advantage of D2+ lymph node dissection for distal advanced gastric cancer.
Haibin CUI ; Jingyu DENG ; Han LIANG ; Rupeng ZHANG ; Xuewei DING ; Yuan PAN ; Baogui WANG ; Weipeng WU
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2015;18(2):127-130
OBJECTIVETo evaluate the value of D2+ lymph node dissection for patients with distal advanced gastric cancer.
METHODSClinicopathological data of 305 cases with distal advanced gastric cancer receiving D2+(n=68) or D2(n=237) lymph node dissection in the Tianjin Cancer Hospital from January 2003 to December 2007 were analyzed retrospectively. The overall 5-year survival rate between the 2 groups.
RESULTSThe median survival was 36 months and the 5-year overall survival rate was 40.3% in all patients. The 5-year overall survival rates in the D2+ and D2 groups were 50.4% and 37.4% respectively, and the difference was statistically significant(P=0.049). In multivariate prognostic analysis however, the extent of lymph node dissection was not identified as an independent prognostic factor(P=0.174). Subgroup analysis showed that 5-year survival rate of D2+ group was significantly higher as compared to D2 group for the following subgroups: maximum diameter of tumor larger than 4 cm(43.9% vs. 27.0%), Borrmann type III(-IIII((55.5% vs. 30.1%), poorly differentiated and undifferentiated tumor (49.8% vs. 37.0%), T4 stage (47.8% vs. 31.0%), N2 stage (53.3% vs. 13.9%), N3 stage (20.0% vs. 9.6%) and positive No.6 lymph nodes (33.1% vs. 16.0%).
CONCLUSIONCompared with D2 lymph node dissection, D2+ lymph node dissection may benefit some patients with large, poorly differentiated, or late-stage tumor.
Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymph Nodes ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasm Staging ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Neoplasms ; Survival Rate
4.Clinical analysis of 156 patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors receiving imatinib therapy.
Li ZHANG ; Mingzhi CAI ; Jingyu DENG ; Xiaona WANG ; Baogui WANG ; Ning LIU ; Yuan PAN ; Rupeng ZHANG ; Qinghao CUI ; Han LIANG
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2014;17(4):331-334
OBJECTIVETo evaluate the impact of primary site, NIH risk and imatinib treatment on the prognosis of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GIST).
METHODSClinicopathological data of 156 adult patients with GIST treated by imatinib in the Cancer Institute and Hospital of Tianjin Medical University from January 2006 to December 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. According to NIH risk classification, 30 patients were at moderate risk and 126 at high risk. Sixty-seven patients had advanced GIST. Prognosis of patients with different primary tumor site, different NIH risk and different treatment was compared respectively.
RESULTSImatinib therapy was well tolerated in all the patients. Eighty-nine cases received radical operation and adjuvant imatinib treatment. Among 67 advanced GIST cases, 26 received radical operation and adjuvant imatinib treatment, 27 received palliative operation and adjuvant imatinib treatment, and 14 received simple adjuvant imatinib treatment without operation. All the patients had routine follow-up, ranging from 9 to 56(median 27) months. The overall survival (OS) rate was 96% in 1-year, 86% in 2-year, and 71% in 3-year. The OS rate was 95% in 1-year, 77% in 2-year, and 65% in 3-year for patients at high risk, and all 100% in 1-, 2-, 3-year for patients at moderate risk, the differences was statistically significant (P=0.001). The OS rate was 97% in 1-year, 90% in 2-year, and 84% in 3-year for patients with gastric GIST, and 95% in 1-year, 69% in 2-year, and 52% in 3-year for patients with non-gastric GIST, the difference was significant(P=0.000). The OS rate was 98% in 1-year, 95% in 2-year, and 90% in 3-year for patients undergoing radical resection and adjuvant imatinib therapy. For 67 advanced GIST patients with imatinib therapy, none had complete remission, 41 had part remission, 15 had stable disease, indicating 56 advanced GIST cases(83.6%) obtaining clinical benefit. The OS rate was 91% in 1-year, 58% in 2-year, and 43% in 3-year.
CONCLUSIONSThe prognosis of high, and non-gastric and advanced GIST patients is poor. Radical resection combined with early imatinib treatment can improve the prognosis of GIST patients.
Antineoplastic Agents ; therapeutic use ; Benzamides ; therapeutic use ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; pathology ; Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Imatinib Mesylate ; Piperazines ; therapeutic use ; Prognosis ; Pyrimidines ; therapeutic use ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate
5.The impact of preoperative weight loss for gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy.
Jingli CUI ; Han LIANG ; Jingyu DENG ; Xuewei DING ; Yuan PAN ; Xiaona WANG ; Baogui WANG ; Liangliang WU ; Nan JIANG
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2014;52(6):409-414
OBJECTIVETo elucidate the prognostic influence of preoperative weight loss for gastric cancer.
METHODSA total of 672 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy between January 2003 and December 2007 were enrolled. The patients were categorized into three groups according to the percentage of weight loss before surgery: no weight loss group (0%), limited group ( < 10%), and severe group ( ≥ 10%). Compared the clinicopathologic characteristics and analyzed the prognostic influence of preoperative weight loss. The survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival cure and the prognostic factors were analyzed univariately and multivariately by Cox comparative hazard modal.
RESULTSAmong the 672 cases gastric cancer, no weight loss group had 275 cases, limited group 294 cases, severe group 103 cases. Tumor size (F = 4.386) , tumor location (χ² = 15.864), depth of invasion (χ² = 22.245) , the number of lymph node metastasis (χ² = 23.803), Surgical approach (χ² = 18.423) , extent of lymphadenectomy (χ² = 8.172) , curability (χ² = 15.650) were discrepant among the three groups (all P < 0.05) . The 5-year survival rate of the patients with severe group was 28.0%, limited group was 37.7%, while the no weight loss group was 40.3% (χ² = 20.148, P < 0.05). Age (95% CI: 0.480 - 0.744, P = 0.000), weight loss before surgery (95% CI: 0.371 - 0.687, P = 0.000), depth invasion (95% CI: 0.289 - 0.564, P = 0.000), lymph node metastasis (95% CI: 0.451 - 0.783, P = 0.000), extent of lymphadenectomy (95% CI: 0.647 - 0.990, P = 0.000), curability (95% CI: 0.291 - 0.486, P = 0.000), postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (95% CI: 0.511 - 0.846, P = 0.000) were associated with survival of this group. In multivariate analysis, age (HR = 1.618, 95% CI: 1.298 - 2.016, P = 0.000), weight loss before surgery (HR = 1.258, 95%CI: 1.077 - 1.469, P = 0.004), depth of invasion (HR = 1.810, 95% CI: 1.287 - 2.545, P = 0.000), N stage (HR = 1.555, 95% CI: 1.413 - 1.172, P = 0.000) were independent prognostic factors for survival.
CONCLUSIONSPatients with weight loss above 10% have poor prognosis. Weight loss before surgery may be an important independent prognostic factor for gastric cancer.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Female ; Gastrectomy ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Preoperative Period ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; surgery ; Survival Analysis ; Weight Loss ; Young Adult