1.A review of human leptospirosis in Malaysia.
Tropical biomedicine 2004;21(2):113-9
This paper reviews the literature on human leptospirosis in Malaysia from its first description in 1925 until the present day. Fletcher diagnosed the first case of human leptospirosis in Malaysia in 1925. Following Fletcher, many investigations on human leptospirosis in Malaysia disclosed a high prevalence of infection. These investigations indicated that the disease was endemic in the country. Examination of 1993 suspected human cases of leptospirosis by Tan indicated 28 % of the cases were positive. In a recent survey, 2190 serum samples from patients with different clinical manifestations in the country disclosed 12.6% were positive for antibodies to leptospires. The risk to leptospiral infection with respect to occupation, location, sex, race and age groups was demonstrated. Both civilians and military personnel were affected. Thirty-seven serovars from thirteen serogroups have been identified in the country. Recent studies on animal leptospirosis showed that the disease was highly endemic in the animal population. It is considered that the majority of leptospirosis cases in humans were due to association of man with animals and disease-infected environment.
Leptospirosis
;
Human
;
Malaysia
;
Review [Publication Type]
;
seconds
2.Serological prevalence of leptospiral infection in wild rats at the National Service Training Centres in Kelantan and Terengganu.
Mohamed Hassan, S N ; Bahaman, A R ; Mutalib, A R ; Khairani Bejo, S
Tropical Biomedicine 2010;27(1):30-2
One hundred and sixty eight rats were trapped from the National Service Training Centres (NSTC) in Kelantan and Terengganu from October 2008 to May 2009. Microscopic agglutination test (MAT) was performed to detect the presence of agglutinating antibodies to Leptospira among the rats caught. All the MAT positive rats were identified as Rattus tiomanicus. In Kelantan, 17.3 % (14/81) of the rats had leptospiral antibodies to serovars Icterohaemorrhagiae (12.3%), Canicola (2.5%), Ballum (1.2%), and Pyrogenes (1.2%). In Terengganu, 18.4% (16/87) of the rats had antibodies to serovars Icterohaemorrhagiae (15%), Canicola (1.1%), Pyrogenes (1.1%) and Hebdomadis (1.1%). This study indicated that Leptospira serovars were prevalent in the rat population in the study areas and could be a source of infection to humans. Therefore, control of the rat population in all NSTC is critical to prevent outbreaks of leptospirosis amongst the NSTC trainees.
3.Detection and distribution of anti-leptospiral antibody among dogs and their handlers
Goh, S.H. ; Khor, K.H. ; Ismail, R. ; Megat Abdul Rani, P.A. ; Mohd Mohidin, T.B. ; Bahaman, A.R. ; Khairani-Bejo, S. ; Radzi, R. ; Alashraf, A.R. ; Sabri, A.R. ; Lau, S.F.
Tropical Biomedicine 2020;37(No.4):1074-1082
The incidence of leptospirosis seems to be on the rise and could be an alarming
indirect indication of a global re-emergence. It is a potential public health threat when dogs
are speculated to be involved in the transmission of leptospirosis through possible subclinical harbouring of Leptospira spp. and subsequent shedding into the environment. This
study aimed to detect anti-leptospiral antibodies among dogs and their handlers using the
microscopic agglutination test (MAT). Blood samples from 266 apparently healthy dogs and
194 dog handlers were collected at four working dog organisations and four dog shelters.
Serum samples were tested using MAT against 20 leptospiral serovars with a cut-off titre
>1:100 (dog) and >1:50 (dog handlers). Seventy dogs (70/266; 26.3%) were seropositive
mainly against serovars Icterohaemorrhagiae, Ballum, Bataviae and Javanica (titres ranged:
1:100–1:800). Sixty-seven dog handlers (67/194; 34.5%) were seropositive mainly against
serovars Grippotyphosa, Icterohaemorrhagiae and Malaysia (titres ranged: 1:50–1:200). Dogs
were seropositive due to exposure, vaccination or active infection. Seropositive dog handlers
could indicate exposure or active infection. This shows the potential of dogs in maintaining
and spreading the infection in Malaysia. Due to the occupational risk as a result of frequent
contact with dogs and exposure to contaminated environments, dog handlers should be made
aware of the presence of this zoonotic disease.