1.Study result of the influence of risk factors in bone setting treatment Colles fracture
Bulgan Ts ; Baasanjav N ; Baatarjav S
Mongolian Medical Sciences 2016;176(2):25-29
Introduction
Irish surgeon Abraham Coll bone lower forearm Call an end in 1814 reports about the location
extension breaks, fractures, called colles fractures. It is common fractures account for 10-20% of the
total respectively fracture, the bottom end 75% of bone fracture forearm. Number of elderly patients
in developed countries has increased, an increasing number of these refractive growth. In 2001, in
the cases of 640,000 fracture United States forearm bone bottom colles.
Purpose
Study for the influence of risk factors in bone setting treatment Colles fracture
Objectives:
1. Forearm bone assessment bottom Colles displaced, some of the causes which affect
nondisplaced fractures, depending upon risk factors
2. Forearm bone to assess what the lower end Colles healing some of the risk factors that may
affect the fracture
Materials and Methods
Trauma and Orthopedic research studies involving the term “Emergency Department” at the forearms
of 80 people age 5-76 bone treatment in patients who received the peace at the lower end Colles
fracture the national center. Respondents grooming, nongrooming divided into 2 groups, which may
not be received and confirmed by refractive index difference in X-ray. To analyze the data elements
of descriptive statistics was used (mean, standard deviation, percentage distribution). As a result of
calculating the difference between the data expressed as a percentage Use Pearson’s chi-squares
method. If using T-test method to calculate the difference between the data and the P value less
than 0.05 considered statistically accurate. Calculating the relationship between the power of the
data evaluated the relationship using spearman correlation coefficient.
Result
Some of the causes and risk factors are compared between groups, Colles difference nondisplaced
fracture purity (r=0.18, p=0.21) or a weak relationship, Colles difference, compared to the
nondisplaced fracture the use of calcium supplementation (r=0.21, p=0.06) associations, Colles
difference, gender nondisplaced fracture compared (r=0.28, p=0.01) weaknesses related were
statistically significant.
Conclusion
1. Colles difference nondisplaced fractures when used in alcohol risk factors affect the injury took
place, and menopause are diagnosed with osteoporosis, previous calcium intake is associated with
weak damage.
2. Colles difference refraction healing has 24-hour loss of time covered detonations often bear
physical therapy show his hand and damaged a hospital that affect healing.
2.RISK FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE CLOSED REDUCTION MANAGEMENT OF THE COLLES’ FRACTURE
Bulgan Ts ; Baasanjav N ; Munkhjargal B ; Chuluunbaatar O ; Baatarjav S
Journal of Surgery 2016;20(2):87-91
Introduction: In 1814 Irish surgeon
Abraham Coll first introduced distal radial
bone fracture in clinical practice as a colles
fracture. It is one of the most common
fractures account for 10-20% of the total
respectively fracture. Case of Colles fracture
has being increased in the developed country
year by year besides the increasing number
of elderly patients. Depending on severity
displaced of the fracture, management
includes closed reduction or surgical
procedure. The aim of study was to study
result of risk factors that influence the
closed reduction management of the Colles
fracture.
Materials and Methods: From hospital
based population 80 patients aged between
5-76 years (mean age 47.31 years, male
61.25%, female 38.7%) were recruited by
cross sectional and randomized method.
Participants were divided into displaced and
non-displaced groups which confirmed by
refractive index difference on X-ray.
Results: The risk factors that influence the
colles fracture closed reduction management
was osteoporosis (p=0.38), menopause
(r=0.18, p=0.27), calcium supplement intake
(r=0.21, p=0.05), received hospital care in
24 hour (p=0.39), apply plaster (p=0.64),
hand sling immobilizer brace (p=0.5) and
physical therapy (p=0.5).
Conclusion: Osteoporosis and menopause
were the risk factors that influenced the
closed reduction management of Colles
fracture. The patient cases that not receiving
emergency medical care in first 24 hours,
not applying plaster, not using the hand sling
immobilizer brace and not receiving physical
therapy was risk factors for extending the
closed reduction management of the Colles
fracture.
3. RISK FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE CLOSED REDUCTION MANAGEMENT OF THE COLLES’ FRACTURE
Bulgan TS ; Baasanjav N ; Munkhjargal B ; Chuluunbaatar O ; Baatarjav S
Journal of Surgery 2016;20(2):87-91
Introduction: In 1814 Irish surgeonAbraham Coll first introduced distal radialbone fracture in clinical practice as a collesfracture. It is one of the most commonfractures account for 10-20% of the totalrespectively fracture. Case of Colles fracturehas being increased in the developed countryyear by year besides the increasing numberof elderly patients. Depending on severitydisplaced of the fracture, managementincludes closed reduction or surgicalprocedure. The aim of study was to studyresult of risk factors that influence theclosed reduction management of the Collesfracture.Materials and Methods: From hospitalbased population 80 patients aged between5-76 years (mean age 47.31 years, male61.25%, female 38.7%) were recruited bycross sectional and randomized method.Participants were divided into displaced andnon-displaced groups which confirmed byrefractive index difference on X-ray.Results: The risk factors that influence thecolles fracture closed reduction managementwas osteoporosis (p=0.38), menopause(r=0.18, p=0.27), calcium supplement intake(r=0.21, p=0.05), received hospital care in24 hour (p=0.39), apply plaster (p=0.64),hand sling immobilizer brace (p=0.5) andphysical therapy (p=0.5).Conclusion: Osteoporosis and menopausewere the risk factors that influenced theclosed reduction management of Collesfracture. The patient cases that not receivingemergency medical care in first 24 hours,not applying plaster, not using the hand slingimmobilizer brace and not receiving physicaltherapy was risk factors for extending theclosed reduction management of the Collesfracture.