1.Preoperative Risk Factors for Residual Aortic Regurgitation after Valve Re-Suspension Procedure in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection
Tsutomu Sugimoto ; Kazuo Yamamoto ; Shinpei Yoshii ; Satoshi Tanaka ; Norihiko Saito ; Chizuo Kikuchi ; Kenji Aoki ; Atsushi Kuwabara ; Shigetaka Kasuya
Japanese Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2005;34(2):93-97
This study evaluated factors influencing residual aortic regurgitation (AR) after valve re-suspension surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. From January 1996 through December 2002, 63 patients were treated for acute type A dissection at our institution. Among these 63 patients, pre-and postoperative echocardiograms were available in 38 patients who underwent surgery combined with native aortic valve re-suspension. These 38 patients were divided into 2 groups according to the postoperative AR grade, i. e.: AR group: AR grade≥II (n=6), no-AR group: AR grade≤I (n=32). The severity of pre and postoperative AR was assessed by transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography. The preoperative diameters of mid ascending aorta and sinotubular junction, and the percentage of the circumference of the dissection at the sinotubular junction level was measured by enhanced CT scan. Preoperative patient backgrounds were similar in both groups. The preoperative AR grade in the AR group was significantly greater than that of the no-AR group (2.25±1.17: 0.69±0.91, p<0.001). The tear was more frequently located in the ascending aorta in the AR group than in the no-AR group (66.7%: 37.5%, p<0.05). The percentage of circumference of the dissection at the sinotubular junction level did not affect the preoperative AR grade, but it did show a tendency to influence the severity of postoperative AR, though the difference was not significant. Three patients (7.9%) had AR grade III at the time of discharge, but did not clinically require further surgical intervention. Preoperative significant AR and the location of the tear in the ascending aorta are associated with postoperative residual AR after aortic valve re-suspension. The percentage of circumference of the dissection at the sinotubular junction level might influence the severity of postoperative AR.
2.A rare case of localized IgG4-related sclerosing cholecystitis mimicking gallbladder cancer
Masaomi ICHINOKAWA ; Joe MATSUMOTO ; Tomotaka KURAYA ; Shota KUWABARA ; Hideyuki WADA ; Kohei KATO ; Atsushi IKEDA ; Katsuhiko MURAKAWA ; Koichi ONO
Journal of Rural Medicine 2019;14(1):138-142
Objective: IgG4-related sclerosing cholecystitis is generally associated with IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis and presents with diffuse, circumferential thickening of the gallbladder wall. We report a rare case of localized IgG4-related sclerosing cholecystitis without IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis, which was difficult to differentiate from gallbladder cancer preoperatively.Patient: A 56-year-old man with suspected IgG4-related disease or gallbladder cancer was admitted to our ward. The serum IgG4 level was elevated at 721 mg/dL. Computed tomography (CT) demonstrated focal wall thickening of the gallbladder fundus. Drip infusion cholecystocholangiography with CT revealed no dilation, stenosis, or border irregularity of the bile duct.Results: For diagnostic and treatment purposes, cholecystectomy with wedge resection of the gallbladder bed was performed. The pathological diagnosis was IgG4-related sclerosing cholecystitis.Conclusion: It is difficult to differentiate IgG4-related sclerosing cholecystitis from gallbladder cancer in cases involving localized thickening of the gallbladder wall. In similar cases, surgical resection with cancer in mind might be performed based on present clinical knowledge.