Background: Laparoscopicappendectomyisasafeandeffectiveprocedureforacute appendicitis. This surgeryhasashorterdurationofhospitalstayandatrendtowardless postoperative infectious complications. Objectives: To evaluate advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic appendectomy with one navel trocar. Subjects and method: Subjects included 38 cases diagnosed acute appendicitis in Cho Ray hospital, from October 2006 to September 2007. The subjects treated by laparoscopic appendectomy with one navel trocar. Results: The subjects included were 14 males (36.8%) and 24 females (63.2%). The subjects\ufffd?average age was 28.82 years (ranged from 14-68 years). The average time of abdominal pain was 18.39 hours (ranged from 8 to 24 hours). The average operative time was 28.34 minutes (ranged from 15 to 65 minutes). The average time of hospital stay was 2.9 days (ranged 1 to 5 days). 36/38 patients (94.7%) had appendix\u2019s location in right iliac fossa. There were 68.4% of patients who reexamined at postoperation. Conclusions: Laparoscopic appendectomy with one navel trocar is a useful method for reducing hospital stay, complications and return to normal activity.
Appendectomy/methods ; Appendicitis/surgery ;

The study involved 165 patients who have postoperative occlusion, including 91 males, 69 females with age ranged from 5 months to 80 years. The results showed that intestinal occlusion is most likely to be seen after operation for appendicitis, gastro-duodenal perforation and abdominal injury. Surgery for occlusion is performed if conservative treatments (gastric aspiration, fluid infusion and antibiotics) were failure. There were 8 deaths in this series.
Intestinal Obstruction ; Appendicitis ; Surgery

Appendicitis ; Appendix ; pathology ; surgery ; Hernia, Inguinal ; diagnosis ; surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged

Acute Disease ; Appendectomy ; methods ; Appendicitis ; surgery ; General Surgery ; standards ; Humans ; Pathology ; methods

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the ultrasonographic features of paediatric acute appendicitis and incorporate them into a scoring algorithm that will quantify the risk of complications and the strength of recommendation for surgical intervention. METHODS: 179 patients with suspected appendicitis who had undergone ultrasonographic examination were included in this study. Based on their medical evaluation and post-surgical histopathological results, patients were categorised into confirmed appendicitis (n = 101) and non-appendicitis (n = 78) groups. RESULTS: In the appendicitis group, the appendix was visualised in 66 (65.3%) patients. In cases where the appendix was not visualised, we looked out for secondary inflammatory signs, which were present in 32 (31.7%) patients. Using stepwise logistic regression, Blumberg's sign, free fluid or collection, hyperaemia, non-compressible appendix and an appendix diameter > 7 mm were found to be significant predictive factors for appendicitis. A new scoring system called POPs was developed, combining inflammatory predictors and ultrasonography findings, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.958 (95% confidence interval 0.929-0.986). CONCLUSION The newly developed POPs-based diagnosis scheme proved a promising alternative to existing scoring systems such as the Alvarado score. Although further calibration would be beneficial, the proposed scoring scheme is simple and easy to understand, memorise and apply in the emergency room.
Acute Disease ; Appendectomy ; Appendicitis/surgery* ; Appendix/surgery* ; Child ; Humans ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Ultrasonography/methods*

Recent reports have demonstrated a negative association between appendectomy and ulcerative colitis. Many retrospective studies have shown that appendectomy appears to be protective against ulcerative colitis. Although the function of appendix is not known, all these studies have suggested that alterations in mucosal immune responses leading to appendicitis or resulting from appendectomy may negatively affect the pathogenic mechanisms of ulcerative colitis. Herein, we report a 45-year-old man who was diagnosed as severe ulcerative colitis 2 years ago. Colonoscopy revealed a feature of pancolitis. He has been treated with several courses of corticosteroids over 2 years. However, dosage of steroid was not tappered down because of the recurrence of symptoms. He was admitted with a diagnosis of acute appendicitis, and underwent appendectomy. Two months after the appendectomy, clinical symptoms and colonoscopic findings improved gradually. Two years after the appendectomy, the patient improved without the recurrences of symptoms, and is stably treated with sulfasalazine alone.
*Appendectomy ; Appendicitis/complications/*surgery ; Colitis, Ulcerative/complications/*physiopathology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the feasibility of a laparoscopic approach in children with generalized peritonitis secondary to perforated appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy with drainage for generalized peritonitis secondary to perforated appendicitis at our hospital between September 2001 and April 2012. Laparoscopic outcomes were compared with outcomes of an open method for perforated appendicitis. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for generalized peritonitis from perforated appendicitis, and 87 patients underwent open appendectomy (OA) for perforated appendicitis. Wound infection was more common in the OA group (12.6%) than in the LA group (4.0%; p=0.032). The incidence of intestinal obstruction during long-term follow-up was significantly higher in the OA group (4.6% vs. 0.0% in the LA group; p=0.046). LA was possible in most patients for whom LA was attempted, with a conversion rate of 10.8%. Conversion to OA was affected by the preoperative duration of symptoms and the occurrence of intraoperative complications. CONCLUSION: LA is feasible for use in children with generalized peritonitis from perforated appendicitis, with reasonable open conversion and perioperative complication rates comparable to those of the OA group.
Appendicitis/*complications/*etiology/*surgery ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy/*methods ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

PURPOSE: Acute gangrenous and perforated appendicitis are associated with an increased risk for intraoperative conversion, postoperative complications and have been considered a relative contraindication for laparoscopic appendectomy. The objective of this study was to analyze the feasibility of the laparoscopic approach in all forms of appendicitis. METHODS: A retrospective review of 101 patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis (perforated appendicitis and periappendiceal abscess) between June 2000 and May 2001 was performed. RESULTS: There were 84 patients with uncomplicated appendicitis (group A), 11 patients with perforated appendicitis (group B) and 16 patients with periappendiceal abscess (group C). The mean age of the patients was 42 (12~79) years and there were 47 men and 54 women. The mean operation time was 43, 67 and 105 minutes in groups A, B and C, respectively. Oral intake commenced at 1.4, 2.2 and 2.9 days and the hospital stay was 2.5, 2.9 and 5.2 days in groups A, B and C, respectively. There was no conversion to open surgery in groups A and B; however 4 patients in group C were converted. Complications were noted in 3 patients, one for each group. The overall complication rate was 2.9% and conversion rate, 0.9%. CONCLUSION: Although our experience is limited, the laparoscopic appendectomy seems to be a feasible and safe procedure for all forms of apppendicitis, including periappendiceal abscess.
Abscess ; Appendectomy* ; Appendicitis* ; Conversion to Open Surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies

We performed a meta-analysis using results in the Korean literatures to determine whether laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) or open appendectomy (OA) provide the better outcome in possible acute appendicitis patients. To perform the meta-analysis, an extensive literature search was conducted, giving priority to the Journal of the Korean Surgical Society, and domestic literature in its search database, published since January 1993, to ascertain the usefulness of LA in the treatment of acute appendicitis. The criteria used for the quality evaluation were as follows: 1) study subjects must have been evaluated clinically for suspected acute appendicitis, and 2) articles were included only if sufficient data (e.g. patient number, mean and standard deviation of patient outcome variables) were available regarding patient outcomes for LA or OA treated appendicitis. Of the 136 articles retrieved, 8 studies (1, 258 patients) were selected for quantitative meta-analysis. Because insufficient data was available in some studies, operating time and hospitalization days were assessed for all 8 studies, but the time required to return to full functioning was assessed for only 3 studies. Overall effect size estimates were calculated using a random effect model for four patient outcomes (operating time, Q=38.6699, p < 0.001; length of stay, Q=19.3876, p < 0.001; postoperative hospital stay, Q=20.9164, p < 0.001; and return time to full functioning, Q=41.5061, p < 0.001). Because the overall effect size for operating time was -0.3218 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.6108 to -0.0328), LA operating time was significantly greater than that of OA. In addition, a significant difference was found between the two modalities in terms of the length of hospital stay. Overall effect size in terms of the time required to return to full functioning was 1.9757 (95% CI 1.0066 to 2.9448), and LA reduced the time required by about 2 days versus OA. Considering the overall odds ratio (0.33) and 95% CI (0.20 to 0.55) the incidence of wound infection was significantly lower in LA than in OA. This review of the published evidence suggests that LA is more useful for treating acute appendicitis, especially when perforated appendicitis is suspected.
Acute Disease ; Appendectomy/*methods ; Appendicitis/*surgery ; Human ; Korea ; *Laparoscopy ; Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

In oral and maxillofacial surgery, careful management is necessary to avoid infection for old aged person or patient with diabetes mellitus(DM). We experienced a 69 years old female patient with DM, who has liver abscess and appendicitis, caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae, was developed into left mid-facial abscess and peritonitis. We report this case along with review of article for we have gained fairly good results in our attempt to resolve the patient's abscess by means of I & D of the left mid-face and percutaneous catheter drainage of the stomach, supplemented with fluid and antibiotic therapy.
Abscess ; Aged ; Appendicitis ; Catheters ; Drainage ; Female ; Humans ; Klebsiella pneumoniae ; Liver ; Liver Abscess ; Peritonitis ; Stomach ; Surgery, Oral