1.Community-based health program (CBHP) workshop formative evaluation.
Roberto L. RUIZ ; Anthony CORDERO ; Nanette RAMILO-CRUZ
The Filipino Family Physician 2017;55(1):39-44
SCOPE: A formative evaluation of a one-day Community-Based Health Program (CBHP) workshop in an urban poor setting in Silang,Cavite was done.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if the workshop was feasible and useful from the perspective of important stakeholders.
RESEARCH DESIGN: A descriptive research design was used with triangulation of data sources: participant observation, short-form questionnaire and monitoring checklist.
RESULTS: The responses from the short-form, self-administered feedback questionnaire showed that out of the 42 participants: 1) 38% liked that they gained knowledge from the workshop; 2) 72.3% expressed that there was nothing that they disliked during the sessions; 3) about 13% expressed their desire to have more workshops like this one in the future; and 4) only 6.4% learned the importance of CBHP. It was observed frequently during discussions that participants said that the San Beda College of Medicine, played an important and crucial role in the CBHP. The College was visible and active together with the staff of the Canossa Health and Social Center run by the Canossian Daughters of Charity as well as with its community leader, Sr. Maria Elena Adre. With the presence of the clinical clerks and doctors of San Beda College of Medicine, the program continuously provided health services. Furthermore, other strengths that were mentioned were the volunteer health workers, the laboratory (microscopy), numerous training activities and seminars, feeding program and scholarship program.
CONCLUSION: A one-day CBHP workshop was feasible and useful in an urban poor community setting from the perspective of important stakeholders.
Human ; Male ; Female ; Charities ; Checklist ; Feedback ; Health Promotion ; Information Storage And Retrieval ; Microscopy ; Nuclear Family ; Physicians ; Surveys And Questionnaires ; Volunteers
2.Levodopa+carbidopa in x-linked dystonia parkinsonism (XDP/DYT3/Lubag): A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Roland Dominic G. JAMORA ; Rosalia A. TELEG ; Cynthia P. CORDERO ; Rodelyn F. VILLAREAL-JORDAN ; Lillian V. LEE ; Paul Matthew D. PASCO
Acta Medica Philippina 2018;52(61):511-515
OBJECTIVE: X-linked dystonia parkinsonism (XDP) is an adult-onset, progressive and debilitating movement disorder described among Filipino males from Panay Island. The available oral medications have been ineffective. While chemodenervation with botulinum toxin A works and deep brain stimulation surgery is promising, these are not affordable for the vast majority of patients. Thus, we decided to look into the efficacy, safety and tolerability of levodopa+carbidopa (levodopa) versus placebo among patients with XDP.
METHODS: This was a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Patients were randomized to receive levodopa or placebo for 6 months. The dose was increased gradually until 1000 mg levodopa/day is reached or until side effects appear.
RESULTS: A total of 86 out of 94 randomized patients (91.5%) were included in the intention-to-treat cohort for the primary efficacy analysis. Nineteen patients (9 in levodopa, 10 in placebo) dropped out or were lost to follow up. There was no significant difference in the baseline and last visit Burke Fahn Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale and the part III of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale scores between levodopa and placebo. The most common adverse events in the levodopa group were increased movements, pain and nausea/ vomiting.
CONCLUSION: While levodopa is safe and well-tolerated, it does not have any effect in alleviating the dystonia or parkinsonism in XDP.
Human ; Dystonia ; Parkinsonian Disorders ; Levodopa ; Carbidopa ; Parkinson Disease
3.Adherence of physicians to local guideline recommendations among patients with COVID-19 in two Tertiary Public Hospitals in Metro Manila, Philippines: A rapid assessment study
Anton G. Elepañ ; o ; Cynthia P. Cordero ; Lia M. Palileo-Villanueva ; Nina T. Castillo-Carandang ; Maria Teresa B. Abola ; Jan Bendric C. Borbe ; Vincent Anthony S. Tang ; Jerahmeel Aleson L. Mapili ; Bryan F. Elvambuena ; Rogelio N. Velasco Jr ; Leahdette O. Padua ; Carl Lawrence C. Arenos ; Leonila F. Dans ; Antonio Miguel L. Dans
Acta Medica Philippina 2023;57(11):34-40
Objectives:
Adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPG) has been shown to reduce inter-physician practice
variation and improve quality of care. This study evaluated guideline adherence of physicians in two tertiary public hospitals to local CPG on COVID-19.
Methods:
This was a multicenter, retrospective chart review, rapid assessment method study. Guideline adherence and non-adherence (overuse and underuse) to 15 strong recommendations in the prevailing Philippine COVID-19 Living Recommendations were assessed among a sample of patients admitted in two centers from July to October 2021. Differences in adherence across COVID-19 disease severities and managing hospital units were analyzed.
Results:
A total of 723 patient charts from two centers were reviewed. Guideline adherence to dexamethasone use among patients with hypoxemia is 91.4% (95% CI 88.6 to 93.6) with 9.2% overuse. Tocilizumab was underused in 52.2% of patients with indications to receive the drug. There was overuse of empiric antibiotics in 43.6% of patients without suspicion of bacterial coinfection. Lowest adherence to antibiotic use was seen among patients with critical disease severity and those managed in the intensive care unit. None of the other non-recommended treatment modalities were given.
Conclusion
Management of COVID-19 in both centers was generally adherent to guideline recommendations.
We detected high underuse of tocilizumab probably related to the global supply shortage during the study
period and high overuse of antibiotics in patients without suspicion of bacterial coinfection. While the results of this study cannot be generalized in other healthcare settings, we recommend the application of similar rapid assessment studies in guideline adherence evaluation as a quality improvement tool and to identify issues with resource utilization especially during public health emergencies.
Guideline Adherence
;
COVID-19
;
Quality Improvement
4.Adherence of physicians to local guideline recommendations among patients with COVID-19 in two tertiary public hospitals in Metro Manila, Philippines: A rapid assessment study
Anton G. Elepañ ; o ; Cynthia P. Cordero ; Lia M. Palileo-Villanueva ; Nina T. Castillo-Carandang ; Maria Teresa B. Abola ; Jan Bendric C. Borbe ; Vincent Anthony S. Tang ; Jerahmeel Aleson L. Mapili ; Bryan F. Elvambuena ; Rogelio N. Velasco Jr. ; Leahdette O. Padua ; Carl Lawrence C. Arenos ; Leonila F. Dans ; Antonio Miguel L. Dans
Acta Medica Philippina 2020;54(Online):1-7
Objectives:
Adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPG) has been shown to reduce inter-physician practice
variation and improve quality of care. This study evaluated guideline adherence of physicians in two tertiary public hospitals to local CPG on COVID-19.
Methods:
This was a multicenter, retrospective chart review, rapid assessment method study. Guideline adherence and non-adherence (overuse and underuse) to 15 strong recommendations in the prevailing Philippine COVID-19 Living Recommendations were assessed among a sample of patients admitted in two centers from July to October 2021. Differences in adherence across COVID-19 disease severities and managing hospital units were analyzed.
Results:
A total of 723 patient charts from two centers were reviewed. Guideline adherence to dexamethasone use among patients with hypoxemia is 91.4% (95% CI 88.6 to 93.6) with 9.2% overuse. Tocilizumab was underused in 52.2% of patients with indications to receive the drug. There was overuse of empiric antibiotics in 43.6% of patients without suspicion of bacterial coinfection. Lowest adherence to antibiotic use was seen among patients with critical disease severity and those managed in the intensive care unit. None of the other non-recommended treatment modalities were given.
Conclusion
Management of COVID-19 in both centers was generally adherent to guideline recommendations. We detected high underuse of tocilizumab probably related to the global supply shortage during the study period and high overuse of antibiotics in patients without suspicion of bacterial coinfection. While the results of this study cannot be generalized in other healthcare settings, we recommend the application of similar rapid assessment studies in guideline adherence evaluation as a quality improvement tool and to identify issues with resource utilization especially during public health emergencies
Guideline Adherence
;
COVID-19
;
Quality Improvement