Introduction: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been considered as the gold standard treatment for obstructive voiding dysfunction in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. This standard treatment has been challenged by consistent data demonstrating the superiority of Holmium enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). We review summarizes the literature comparing HoLEP to traditional therapies TURP, open prostatectomy (OP) for BPH these are widely used and have long term efficacy data. Patients undergoing HoLEP have significant shortened catheterization times, decreased length of hospital stay, fewer serious postoperative complications, greater reduction in post-operative IPSS, greater improvements in post-operative Qmax and lower rates of repeat endoscopic procedures for recurrent symptoms compared with TURP and OP. Furthermore, HoLEP can be used to resect more than 100 grams tissue and it is equivalent efficacy to open prostatectomy. Conclusion: HoLEP as the new gold standard treatment for surgical BPH therapy further. HoLEP remains its difficult learning curve when compared with traditional transurethral resection.

Introduction: Transurethral resection ofthe prostate (TURP) has been considered asthe gold standard treatment for obstructivevoiding dysfunction in men with benignprostatic hyperplasia. This standard treatmenthas been challenged by consistent datademonstrating the superiority of Holmiumenucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). Wereview summarizes the literature comparingHoLEP to traditional therapies TURP, openprostatectomy (OP) for BPH these are widelyused and have long term efficacy data.Patients undergoing HoLEP have significantshortened catheterization times, decreasedlength of hospital stay, fewer serious postoperativecomplications, greater reduction inpost-operative IPSS, greater improvementsin post-operative Qmax and lower rates ofrepeat endoscopic procedures for recurrentsymptoms compared with TURP and OP.Furthermore, HoLEP can be used to resectmore than 100 grams tissue and it isequivalent efficacy to open prostatectomy.Conclusion: HoLEP as the new goldstandard treatment for surgical BPH therapyfurther. HoLEP remains its difficult learningcurve when compared with traditionaltransurethral resection.

Background: In worldwide, 16.9 million cases of stroke were reported in 2010. It has increased by 68% since 1990. In 2016, there were 5.5 million deaths attributable to cerebrovascular disease worldwide (2.7 million deaths from ischemic stroke and 2.8 million deaths from hemorrhagic stroke). Furthermore, dysphagia is one of the most common complication and occurs 35-78% of patients with stroke. Specifically, dysphagia occurs in 51-100% of the brain stem stroke patients. Moreover, it could be the independent factor to predict mortality. In other words, it directly impacts the quality of life and decreases social activity.
Incidence of cardiovascular disease and stroke have been increasing related to instability of economy, urbanization, bad lifestyle and stress. As a result of that, dysphagia has increased as well and is becoming one of the pressing issue of health care. It results malnutrition and prolonged the hospital stays. Unfortunately, its diagnosis and treatment are still not clearly defined yet.
Many researchers have investigated patients’ treatment outcome using a single treatment. In other word, researchers have studied the comparison of the separate results of electric stimulation and traditional swallowing therapies. In this study, we studied the results of combination therapy of traditional swallowing and muscle stimulation, and we aimed to identify the benefits of the combined therapeutic approach and to propose the effective, non-invasive methods for patients. Objective: We aimed to study treatment outcome and quality of life among stroke patients with dysphagia. Material and Methods: The study was conducted on a hospital-based, cross-sectional method. Study participants were obtained from Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolian University for the Nationalities between July 2018 and March 2019. All patients were divided into the three treatment groups. 150 dysphagic patients were evaluated by Swallowing Related Quality of Life (SWL-QOL) Scale before and after the treatment. Results: In total, 150 participants (mean age=59.70±9.55 years) aged between 34-77 were obtained in this study. There were no statistically significant differences between the three groups in age (p=0.609).The data showed statistically significant positive treatment effect for all three groups (p=0.0001).The SWAL-QOL score was 39.25±3.50 in A group, 39.10±3.54 in B group, 42.12±4.55 in C group after the treatment. The SWAL-QOL score shows statistically significant difference, after the treatment (p=0.0001). Conclusions Rehabilitation treatment combined with neuromuscular electrical simulation appears better outcome than nerve or muscular stimulation combined with rehabilitation among stroke patients with dysphagia.

Background: Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by bronchoconstriction and breathing difficulties, which can be triggered by both allergic and non-allergic mechanisms. In allergic asthma, a hyperreactivity reaction occurs, leading to an increase in fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels. Therefore, FeNO is used to differentiate allergic and non-allergic types of asthma. In recent years, studies have been conducted to assess FeNO as an indicator of treatment effectiveness and symptom control. Our goal is to introduce FeNO measurement in Mongolia for the first time and utilize it for asthma diagnosis and treatment outcome evaluation. Aim: Study of FeNO levels in Asthma Diagnosis in Relation to Laboratory Findings and Lung Function Materials and Methods: This study included a total of 70 adult patients (18 years and older) with asthma who visited the Outpatient Clinic of Mongolia-Japan Hospital and Shargaljuut Spa Clinic from May to December 2024. Based on their allergic history, total IgE levels, and peripheral blood eosinophil count, participants were classified into allergic (>5%) and non-allergic (<5%) asthma. The study aimed to determine the diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of FeNO levels. Asthma control levels were assessed using the Asthma Control Test (ACT), lung function was evaluated using spirometry, and exercise capacity was measured with the 6-minute walk test. Results: In a single measurement, there were no differences between the allergic and non-allergic groups in parameters other than total IgE, peripheral blood eosinophil count, and FeNO levels. For diagnosing the allergic form of asthma, at a FeNO level of 25 ppb, sensitivity (Se) was 0.68, specificity (Sp) was 0.30 (p=0.008); at 40 ppb, Se was 0.77, Sp was 0.31 (p=0.001); and at 50 ppb, Se was 0.74, Sp was 0.33 (p=0.001). Lung function and exercise capacity were similar in both asthma groups. Conclusion The sensitivity of FeNO in distinguishing between allergic and non-allergic forms of asthma is 67-81%, and its sensitivity tends to increase as the FeNO level rises. By distinguishing the allergic type in which inhaled corticosteroids are more effective, the outcome of asthma treatment can be predicted in advance based on the FeNO level.

Background: Asthma management should be individualized, evidence-based, aimed at controlling clinical symptoms, preventing severe exacerbations, and improving quality of life. Studies have shown that inhalation therapy with iodine- bromide saltwater improves lung function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), while radon-containing mineral water inhalation reduces inflammation and oxidative stress in asthma. Several studies have analyzed the composition of the Shargaljuut hot spring, with Oyuntsesteg et al. identifying high levels of Na+-HCO3 - and Na+-SO4. Other studies on mineral water therapies have reported benefits such as thinning bronchial secretions, improving sputum clearance, reducing inflammation and acidity, mitigating oxidative stress, and enhancing quality of life. Aim: To study the effectiveness of combined asthma treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and hot spring inhalation. Materials and Methods: The study included 67 participants diagnosed with asthma who consented to participate and underwent 10 days of combined inhaled corticosteroid therapy and mineral water inhalation at Shargaljuut sanatorium. A total of 57 participants completed the pre- and post-treatment assessments. Treatment result was assessed using Asthma control questionnaire 7, asthma symptom control with Asthma Control Test (ACT), and exercise tolerance by a 6-minute walk test. Chest X-rays were taken for all participants to rule out pneumonia, cancer, or pulmonary fibrosis. Treatment outcomes were evaluated using ACT scores, peripheral blood eosinophil count, total IgE levels in serum, spirometry indices (FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC), and the 6-minute walk distance. Results: The average age of participants was 52±12 years, with a predominance of females. The mean asthma control score was 14.2±4.80, indicating poor asthma control. After 10 days of inhaling corticosteroids combined with hot spring inhalation post-treatment quality of life increased by 0.5 points, FEV1 improved by 7.5%, FVC by 4.2%, peripheral blood eosinophil count decreased by 0.3%, and total Ig E levels dropped from 73.3 (22.5; 216) to 73.2 (21.3; 223) u/ml (p=0.000). Conclusion In cases of uncontrolled asthma remission, combining of inhaled corticosteroid therapy with hot spring inhalation at Shargaljuut improved asthma symptoms, quality of life, enhanced lung function, and reduced inflammatory markers (p<0.001).