Objective: To compare the predictability of flap thickness, visual and refractive outcomes, and higher order aberrations in eyes that underwent myopic LASIK using either a Technolas femtosecond laser or a Zyoptix XP mechanical microkeratome for flap creation. Methods: The study involved a total of 44 eyes of 22 patients who underwent LASIK. Flap creation was randomized to using the Technolas femtosecond laser in one eye and Zyoptix XP microkeratome in the contralateral eye. Flap thickness was measured intraoperatively using ultrasonic pachymetry and postoperatively using the Visante ASOCT. Refractive outcome, visual acuity (VA), higher order aberrations, and contrast sensitivity were compared between the two groups. Results: Twenty-two patients had LASIK for myopia or myopic astigmatism. Using ultrasonic pachymetry intraoperatively, the mean flap thickness was 134 (±10) um and 124 (±23) um in the femtosecond (FS) and microkeratome (MK) groups respectively. Comparing the deviation of the actual from the intended flap thickness, the FS group had statistically lower standard deviation compared to the MK group (p=0.04). Using the AS-OCT, the mean flap thickness at 3 months postoperatively was 119 (±10.82) um and 123 (±15.77) um in the FS and MK groups respectively. The difference in standard deviation between the two groups did not reach statistical significance (p=0.19). The mean spherical equivalent at 3 months was -0.45D (±0.42) and -0.13D (±0.16) respectively. Eightynine percent (89%) of eyes had uncorrected VA of 20/20 or better in both groups. All eyes attained best corrected VA of 20/20 or better in both groups. Differences in total higher order aberrations (p=0.09) and contrast sensitivity scores (p=0.47) were not statistically different between the two groups. Conclusion Flap thickness predictability was better using the Technolas femtosecond laser compared to the XP microkeratome blade. Visual and refractive outcomes, higher order aberrations, and contrast sensitivity were comparable between the 2 groups.
Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ ; Lasers, Excimer

Objective: To evaluate the visual and refractive outcomes of eyes implanted with the Crystalens HD and the Crystalens AO intraocular lens. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 159 eyes of 100 patients implanted with the Crystalens HD IOL and 108 eyes of 66 patients implanted with the Crystalens AO IOL. Visual and refractive outcomes preoperatively and postoperatively were assessed and compared between the lenses. Results: At 1 year, uncorrected distance VA was 20/30 in 78% of eyes in the HD and 76% of eyes in the AO groups. Uncorrected intermediate VA was 20/30 in 90% of eyes in both groups. Uncorrected near VA was J3 in 92% in the HD and 90% in the AO groups. Comparing the two groups, the difference in uncorrected distance (p=0.60), intermediate (p=0.77), and near (p=0.64) vision was not statistically significant. Spherical equivalent was -0.42D +/-0.51D in the HD and -0.6 +/-0.48D in the AO groups (p=0.10). Conclusion Refractive outcomes were similar between the Crystalens HD and AO groups. Mild myopic refractive outcomes were targeted and achieved in both lens groups. These refractive outcomes provided good uncorrected distance, intermediate, and near vision postoperatively.
Multifocal Intraocular Lenses