2.Conventional Versus Biological Therapy for Prevention of Postoperative Endoscopic Recurrence in Patients With Crohn's Disease: an International, Multicenter, and Observational Study.
Paulo Gustavo KOTZE ; Antonino SPINELLI ; Rodolff Nunes DA SILVA ; Ivan Folchini DE BARCELOS ; Fabio Vieira TEIXEIRA ; Rogerio SAAD-HOSSNE ; Idblan Carvalho DE ALBUQUERQUE ; Marcia OLANDOSKI ; Lorete Maria DA SILVA KOTZE ; Yasuo SUZUKI ; Akihiro YAMADA ; Ken TAKEUCHI ; Matteo SACCHI ; Takayuki YAMAMOTO
Intestinal Research 2015;13(3):259-265
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Postoperative endoscopic recurrence (PER) occurs in nearly 80% of patients 1 year after ileocecal resection in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). Biological agents were more effective in reducing the rates of PER in comparison with conventional therapy, in prospective trials. The aim of this study was to compare the PER rates of biological versus conventional therapy after ileocecal resections in patients with CD in real-world practice. METHODS: The MULTIPER (Multicenter International Postoperative Endoscopic Recurrence) database is a retrospective analysis of PER rates in CD patients after ileocecal resection, from 7 referral centers in 3 different countries. All consecutive patients who underwent ileocecal resections between 2008 and 2012 and in whom colonoscopies had been performed up to 12 months after surgery, were included. Recurrence was defined as Rutgeerts' score > or =i2. The patients were allocated to either biological or conventional therapy after surgery, and PER rates were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Initially, 231 patients were evaluated, and 63 were excluded. Of the 168 patients in the database, 96 received anti-tumor necrosis factor agents and 72 were treated with conventional therapy after resection. The groups were comparable regarding age, gender, and perianal disease. There was longer disease duration, more previous resections, and more open surgical procedures in patients on biologicals postoperatively. PER was identified in 25/96 (26%) patients on biological therapy and in 24/72 (33.3%) patients on conventional therapy (P=0.310). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective observational analysis from an international database, no difference was observed between biological and conventional therapy in preventing PER after ileocecal resections in CD patients.
Biological Factors
;
Biological Therapy*
;
Colonoscopy
;
Crohn Disease*
;
Humans
;
Necrosis
;
Observational Study*
;
Recurrence*
;
Referral and Consultation
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
3.Three Cases of Successful Conservative Treatment of Ischemic Colitis With Hepatic Portal Venous Gas
Kosuke INADA ; Yasuhiro KURUMIYA ; Keisuke MIZUNO ; Ei SEKOGUCHI ; Gen SUGAWARA ; Masaya INOUE ; Takehiro KATO ; Naohiro AKITA ; Takayuki MINAMI ; Akihiro SEKIMOTO ; Kenji TAKEUCHI ; Akihito OGATA ; Akiko OSADA
Journal of the Japanese Association of Rural Medicine 2021;69(6):612-617
Here, we report 3 cases of conservatively treated ischemic colitis with hepatic portal venous gas. In Case 1, an 84-year-old man visited the emergency department because of fatigue, vomiting, and upper abdominal pain. In Case 2, a 72-year-old man was hospitalized for rehabilitation in another hospital following cervical spine trauma. He had diarrhea and mesogastric pain for 2 days and was transferred to our hospital. In Case 3, an 89-year-old woman visited the emergency department because of upper abdominal pain and vomiting. In all cases, we diagnosed the illness as ischemic colitis with hepatic portal venous gas based on computed tomography findings, and the vital signs of all patients were stable. They were treated conservatively. They were able to resume oral intake and were discharged or transferred to another hospital. Hepatic portal venous gas has been considered a poor prognostic sign of severe diseases such as intestinal necrosis. However, recently, reports of cases treated conservatively have been increasing. Conservative treatment may be selected for ischemic colitis associated with hepatic portal venous gas taking into account the patient’s general condition.
4.A Case of Luminal B Breast Cancer in Which Preoperative Chemotherapy Was Used Due to Ineffective Preoperative Hormone Therapy
Yasuhiro KURUMIYA ; Tae NIWA ; Sakura ONISHI ; Shingo OYA ; Keisuke MIZUNO ; Ei SEKOGUCHI ; Gen SUGAWARA ; Masaya INOUE ; Takehiro KATO ; Naohiro AKITA ; Takayuki MINAMI ; Kosuke INADA ; Kenji TAKEUCHI ; Akihiro SEKIMOTO ; Akihito OGATA ; Akiko OSADA
Journal of the Japanese Association of Rural Medicine 2022;71(1):63-68
A 66-year-old, postmenopausal woman was referred to our hospital because of abnormal breast cancer screening results. A tumor was found in the upper outer part of the left breast. Biopsy revealed papillotubular carcinoma, ER (Allred score total score [TS] 3 = proportion score [PS] 2 + intensity score [IS] 1), PgR (Allred score TS 3 = PS 2 + IS 1), HER2 (2+), fluorescent in situ hybridization 1.1 (negative), and Ki-67 labeling index 15%. In diagnostic imaging, the tumor size was 35 mm. The diagnosis was T2N0M0 Stage IIA, luminal B-like breast cancer. First, letrozole 2.5 mg/day was administered as preoperative hormone therapy. After 2 months of treatment with letrozole, the tumor size had increased to 44 mm and preoperative hormone therapy was discontinued. She was started on preoperative chemotherapy (4 courses of epirubicin plus cyclophsphamide followed by 4 courses of triweekly docetaxel). The tumor size decreased, becoming undetectable. After these preoperative treatments, nipple-sparing mastectomy, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and breast reconstruction with a primary latissimus dorsi flap were performed. As of 3 years and 6 months after the operation, there has been no recurrence. At first, preoperative hormone therapy is performed for Luminal B-like breast cancer as in this case, if the response is insufficient, preoperative chemotherapy after hormone therapy may be a therapeutic option.