BACKGROUND: Indoor air quality (IAQ) is an important determinant of human health. In Japan, IAQ guidelines have been established for 13 chemicals since 1997. Regarding ethylbenzene (EB), a previous guideline value of 3800 µg/m³ was established in 2000. However, the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare decided to revise the value because of the publication of new hazard information after the establishment of the previous guideline value and the establishment of their respective IAQ guidelines by foreign organizations based on the new hazard information. This study conducted a detailed hazard assessment on EB and derived hazard assessment values to provide a toxicologically valid basis for revising the IAQ guideline value. METHODS: As it was defined that the IAQ guidelines would not exert adverse health effects on humans even if they inhaled the chemicals from indoor air over a lifetime, we investigated the general toxicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity of EB based on reliable hazard information cited in published assessment documents by domestic, foreign, or international risk assessment organizations. All the collected hazard information was examined, and we originally judged the no-observed adverse effect level and the lowest observed adverse effect level of each toxicity study. We then selected the most appropriate key study, an endpoint, and a point of departure and derived the hazard assessment values for each toxicity category. Finally, we selected a representative hazard assessment value for EB from the minimum hazard assessment value among general toxicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity, and carcinogenicity. RESULTS: Among the three toxicity categories, the minimum hazard assessment value was obtained from general toxicity, which was 0.0858 ppm (370 µg/m³) based on the loss of the outer hair cells in the organ of Corti in the cochlea observed in a 13-week repeated-dose inhalation toxicity study using rats. CONCLUSIONS It would be appropriate to adopt 0.0858 ppm (370 µg/m³) as a representative hazard assessment value to provide a basis for revising the IAQ guideline value for EB.
Japan ; Air Pollution, Indoor/adverse effects* ; Risk Assessment ; Humans ; Benzene Derivatives/toxicity* ; Guidelines as Topic ; Animals ; Air Pollutants/toxicity*

BACKGROUND: Exposure to air pollution and adherence to a healthy lifestyle have been identified to be related to sarcopenia. However, the interactive effects between these two factors remain insufficiently elucidated. The present study was designed to investigate the potential interaction exposure to air pollution with healthy lifestyle on the risk of developing sarcopenia. METHODS: In the retrospective cohort study, all data was extracted from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Household air pollution was assessed based on the utilization of solid fuels for cooking and heating. A lifestyle score was constructed comprising information on physical activity, smoking, drinking and sleeping time. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to assess the effects of household air pollution and healthy lifestyle score on sarcopenia, separately. We further explored the additive interaction between household air pollution and healthy lifestyle score to sarcopenia using the interaction table developed by T Anderson. Relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI), attributable proportion (AP), and synergy index (SI) were used to evaluate the additive interactive effect. RESULTS: 2,114 participants were included in this study. The result indicated that exposed to household air pollution [adjusted relative risk (RR) = 1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15-2.94] and unhealthy lifestyle (adjusted RR = 1.46, 95%CI: 1.04-2.03) were both significantly associated with increased risk of sarcopenia. Furthermore, participants exposed to both household air pollution and an unhealthy lifestyle exhibited a significantly higher risk of sarcopenia relative to those without household air pollution exposure and maintaining a healthy lifestyle (adjusted RR = 2.44). But RERI, AP, and SI suggested that there is no statistically significant additive interaction between household air pollution exposure and healthy lifestyle factors in relation to sarcopenia risk. CONCLUSION Household air pollution in conjunction with an unhealthy lifestyle confers a significantly higher risk of sarcopenia compared to either factor in isolation, with no evidence of a significant additive interaction between these two risk factors.
Humans ; China/epidemiology* ; Male ; Sarcopenia/etiology* ; Female ; Longitudinal Studies ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Air Pollution, Indoor/adverse effects* ; Retrospective Studies ; Healthy Lifestyle ; Risk Factors ; Environmental Exposure/adverse effects* ; Cooking ; Aged, 80 and over

OBJECTIVE: Burning solid cooking fuel contributes to household air pollution and is associated with frailty. However, how solid cooking fuel use contributes to the development of frailty has not been well illustrated. METHODS: This study recruited 8,947 participants aged ≥ 45 years from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, 2011-2018. Group-based trajectory modeling was employed to identify frailty trajectories. Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess the association between solid cooking fuel use and frailty trajectories. Population-attributable fractions were used to estimate the frailty burden from solid fuel use. RESULTS: We identified three frailty trajectories: low-stable ( n = 5,789), moderate-increasing ( n = 2,603), and fast-increasing ( n = 555). Solid fuel use was associated with higher odds of being in the moderate-increasing ( OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.08-1.42) and fast-increasing ( OR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.14-1.92) trajectories. These associations were strengthened by longer solid fuel use ( P for trend < 0.001). Switching to clean fuel significantly reduced the risk of being in these trajectories compared with persistent solid fuel users. Without solid fuel, 8% of moderate- and 19% of fast-increasing trajectories demonstrated frailty development like the low-stable group. CONCLUSION Solid cooking fuel use is associated with frailty trajectories in middle-aged and older Chinese populations.
Humans ; China/epidemiology* ; Cooking ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Air Pollution, Indoor/adverse effects* ; Frailty/etiology* ; Longitudinal Studies ; Cohort Studies

OBJECTIVES: To characterize fine particulate matter (PM _2.5)-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) emitted from different cooking fumes and their exposure routes and assess their health-associated impact to provide a reference for health risk prevention from PAH exposure across different age and sex groups. METHODS: Sixteen PM _2.5-bound PAHs emitted from 11 cooking styles were analyzed using GC-MS/MS. The health hazards of these PAHs in the Handan City population (stratified by age and sex) were predicted using the incremental lifetime cancer risk ( ILCR) model. The respiratory deposition doses ( RDDs) of the PAHs in children and adults were calculated using the PM _2.5 deposition rates in the upper airway, tracheobronchial, and alveolar regions. RESULTS: The total concentrations of PM _2.5-bound PAHs ranged from 61.10 to 403.80 ng/m ³. Regardless of cooking styles, the ILCR _total values for adults (1.23 × 10 ^-6 to 3.70 × 10 ^-6) and older adults (1.28 × 10 ^-6 to 3.88 × 10 ^-6) exceeded the acceptable limit of 1.00 × 10 ^-6. With increasing age, the ILCR _total value first declined and then increased, varying substantially among the population groups. Cancer risk exhibited particularly high sensitivity to short exposure to barbecue-derived PAHs under equivalent body weights. Furthermore, barbecue, Sichuan and Hunan cuisine, Chinese cuisine, and Chinese fast food were associated with higher RDDs for both adults and children. CONCLUSION ILCR _total values exceeded the acceptable limit for both females and males of adults, with all cooking styles showing a potentially high cancer risk. Our findings serve as an important reference for refining regulatory strategies related to catering emissions and mitigating health risks associated with cooking styles.
Humans ; Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons/analysis* ; Cooking/methods* ; Male ; Female ; Particulate Matter/analysis* ; Adult ; Child ; Middle Aged ; Air Pollutants/analysis* ; Adolescent ; Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis* ; Young Adult ; Child, Preschool ; Aged ; China ; Inhalation Exposure ; Age Factors ; Sex Factors ; Cities ; Infant

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to analyze the current indoor radon level and estimate the population risk of radon-induced lung cancer in urban areas of China. METHODS: Using the passive monitoring method, a new survey on indoor radon concentrations was conducted in 2,875 dwellings across 31 provincial capital cities in Chinese mainland from 2018 to 2023. The attributable risk of lung cancer induced by indoor radon exposure was estimated based on the risk assessment model. RESULTS: The arithmetic mean (AM) and geometric mean (GM) of indoor radon concentrations were 65 Bq/m³ and 55 Bq/m³, respectively, with 13.6% of measured dwellings exceeding 100 Bq/m³ and 0.6% exceeding 300 Bq/m³. The estimated number of lung cancer deaths induced by indoor radon exposure was 150,795, accounting for 20.30% (95% CI: 20.21%-20.49%) of the lung cancer death toll. CONCLUSION This study provided the most recent data on national indoor radon levels in urban areas and the attributable risk of lung cancer. These results served as an important foundation for further research on the disease burden of indoor radon exposure and radon mitigation efforts.
Radon/analysis* ; China/epidemiology* ; Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis* ; Lung Neoplasms/etiology* ; Humans ; Cities/epidemiology* ; Air Pollutants, Radioactive/adverse effects* ; Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology* ; Risk Assessment ; Radiation Monitoring

Objective To explore the overall level,distribution characteristics,and differences in household fine particulate matter (PM_2.5) pollution caused by fuel burning in urban and rural areas in China. Methods The relevant articles published from 1991 to 2021 were retrieved and included in this study.The data including the average concentration of household PM_2.5 and urban and rural areas were extracted,and the stoves and fuel types were reclassified.The average concentration of PM_2.5 in different areas was calculated and analyzed by nonparametric test. Results The average household PM_2.5 concentration in China was (178.81±249.91) μg/m³.The mean household PM_2.5 concentration was higher in rural areas than in urban areas[(206.08±279.40) μg/m³ vs. (110.63±131.16) μg/m³;Z=-5.45,P<0.001] and higher in northern areas than in southern areas[(224.27±301.66) μg/m³ vs.(130.11±140.61) μg/m³;Z=-2.38,P=0.017].The north-south difference in household PM_2.5 concentration was more significant in rural areas than in urban areas[(324.19±367.94) μg/m³ vs.(141.20±151.05) μg/m³,χ²=-5.06,P<0.001].The PM_2.5 pollution level showed differences between urban and rural households using different fuel types (χ²=92.85,P<0.001),stove types (χ²=74.42,P<0.001),and whether they were heating (Z=-4.43,P<0.001).Specifically,rural households mainly used solid fuels (manure,charcoal,coal) and traditional or improved stoves,while urban households mainly used clean fuels (gas) and clean stoves.The PM_2.5 concentrations in heated households were higher than those in non-heated households in both rural and urban areas (Z=-4.43,P<0.001). Conclusions The household PM_2.5 pollution caused by fuel combustion in China remains a high level.The PM_2.5 concentration shows a significant difference between urban and rural households,and the PM_2.5 pollution is more serious in rural households.The difference in the household PM_2.5 concentration between urban and rural areas is more significant in northern China.PM_2.5 pollution in the households using solid fuel,traditional stoves,and heating is serious,and thus targeted measures should be taken to control PM_2.5 pollution in these households.
Humans ; Particulate Matter/analysis* ; Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis* ; Cooking ; Environmental Exposure/analysis* ; China ; Rural Population

The formulation and revision of the detection methods of indoor air quality standards is an important, rigorous and delicate endeavor. The standards for indoor air quality (GB/T 18883-2022) were issued by the State Administration of Market Regulation and the Standardization Administration on July 11, 2022, and implemented on February 1, 2023 by replacing indoor air quality standards (GB/T 18883-2002). The revised standard specifies hygienic requirements for physical, chemical, biological and radioactive indicators in indoor air and the corresponding test methods. This article interpreted the revision background, drafting principles, main indicators and methods, as well as the revision basis of the standards. Recommendations for the implementation of the standards are also proposed.
Humans ; Air Pollution, Indoor/prevention & control* ; Environmental Monitoring ; Reference Standards ; China ; Air Pollutants/analysis*

Formaldehyde, as an important pollutant in indoor air, has always been of great concern. In the newly issued "Standards for indoor air quality (GB/T 18883-2022)", the standard limit of formaldehyde has been restricted to 0.08 mg/m³. In order to better promote the implementation and application of this new standard, this study reviewed and interpreted the relevant technical content for determining the standard limit, including the indoor concentration and human exposure levels of formaldehyde, the health effects of formaldehyde, and the derivation of safety reference values. It also proposed prospect for the future development and revision of quality standards for formaldehyde in indoor air.
Humans ; Air Pollution, Indoor ; Air Pollutants/analysis* ; Formaldehyde/analysis* ; China ; Environmental Pollutants

Benzene, as a major indoor pollutant, has received widespread attention. In order to better control indoor benzene pollution and protect people's health, the limit value of benzene in the"Standards for indoor air quality (GB/T 18883-2022)'' was reduced from 0.11 mg/m³ to 0.03 mg/m³. This study reviewed and discussed the relevant technical contents of the determination of benzene limit value, including the exposure status of benzene, health effects, and derivation of the limit value. It also proposed prospects for the future direction of formulating indoor air benzene standards.
Humans ; Air Pollution, Indoor/prevention & control* ; Benzene/analysis* ; Air Pollutants/analysis* ; Environmental Pollutants ; China ; Environmental Monitoring

There are clear indoor air pollution sources of trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene. A large number of epidemiological evidence has confirmed their carcinogenic toxicity and non-carcinogenic toxicity. Several countries and international organizations have paid attention to indoor air trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene. It has been also assessed that there should be certain potential health risk of indoor air trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene in China. Based on the latest research results of health risk assessment of indoor air trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene, the "Standards for indoor air quality (GB/T 18883-2022)" added trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene as indicators. The index limit of trichloroethylene is 6 μg/m³ for an 8-hour average concentration. The index limit of tetrachloroethylene is 120 μg/m³ for an 8-hour average concentration. The technical contents related to the determination of the standard limits of trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene in indoor air were analyzed and discussed, including the sources, the exposure, the health effects, the determination of the limit values, and the recommendations for standard implementation. It also proposed recommendations for the implementation of"Standards for indoor air quality (GB/T 18883-2022)".
Humans ; Tetrachloroethylene/analysis* ; Air Pollution, Indoor ; Trichloroethylene/analysis* ; China