Objective Comparing three screening schemes of colorectal cancer in general population to provide scientific basis for coiorectal cancer screening in communities. Methods Questionnaire screening among high-risk population and immunoassay fecal occult blood test (FOBT) were used for colorectal cancer detection. Colonescopy and pathological test were considered as gold standard of screening results. Results Nine coloreetal cancers and 796 colorectal adenomas were detected in 68 953 participants. Mean onset age of coloreetal adenoma was 7. 7 years earlier than colorectal cancer. For questionnaire and FOBT,the sensitivity was 44.4% ,77.8% and 100.0% ,while the specificity was 98.6%, 95.5% and 94.4%, respectively. The Youden index of questionnaire, FOBT, and questionnaire-FOBT sequential method was 0.4,0.7,and 0.9,and the likelihood ratio ( +/- ) was 32.7/0.6,17. 2/0.2,and 17.8/0.0,respectively. When 50 was used as initial age of screening, screening receivers accounted for 9.7% ,and 66. 7% colorectal cancer could be detected. When 40 was used as initial age of screening, screening receivers and cost increased by 57.1% ,and only 11.1% more patients with colorectal cancer could be detected. Conclusions Questionnaire-FOBT sequential method has high sensitivity and specificity of colorectal cancer screening. Screening at 50 year-old may be better for community residents. The time of colorectal adenoma developed to colorectal cancer is about 8 years.

Objective To investigate the feasibility and clinical significance of fecal DNA tests for colon tumor diagnosis and screening,we inspected the mutations of APC,p53 and K-ras genes in the tissue and feces of patients with colorectal tumor.Methods We collected 46 patients with colorectal cancer(CRC),60 patients with colorectal adenomas( CRA) and 30 cases of normal person in Huizhou First People Hospital in Guangdong Province from Nov.2011 to Aug.2012.Then all the tumor tissues and feces of these people were detected the mu-tation rate about the APC,p53 and K-ras genes using polymerase chain reaction single strand conformation poly-morphism analysis method(PCR-SSCP).Results The mutation rates of APC,p53,K-ras genes of feces in CRC group,CRA group and normal group were 58.7%(27/46),65.2%(30/46)and 60.9%(28/46),20.0%(12/60),25.0%(15/60)and 23.3%(14/60),3.33%(1/30),0%(0/30)and 0%(0/30),respectively.How-ever the mutation rate in tissues were 63.0%(29/46),69.6%(32/46)and 63.0%(29/46),25.0%(15/60), 26.7%(16/60)and 26.7%(16/60),0%(0/30),0%(0/30) and 0%(0/30).Corresponding mutations could be found in feces and tumor tissues.Consistency checking for mutations rate in feces and tumor tissues of CRC group and CRA group showed that the Kappa value were 0.818(P<0.001),0.901(P<0.001),0.862(P<0.001)and 0.857(P<0.001),0.870(P<0.001),0.822(P<0.001).It means an excellent consistency.Con-clusion Fecal DNA testing is expected to become an effective noninvasive colon tumor early diagnosis and screening method.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 10-day moxifloxacin,esomeprazole plus furazolidone triple therapy as first-line treatment to eradicate Helicobacter pylori (Hp)in comparison with the 14-day quadruple therapy containing esomeprazole,amoxicillin, clarithromycin and colloidal bismuth pectin. Methods A total of 1 26 cases of endoscopically confirmed Hp-positive chronic active gastritis or peptic ulcer were randomly assigned to the treatment group to receive esomeprazole,moxifloxacin plus furazolidone triple therapy for 1 0 days;or to the control group to receive esomeprazole, amoxicillin,clarithromycin,and colloidal bismuth pectin quadruple therapy for 14 days.Clinical efficacy and safety were evaluated after 4-week treatment.Results At the end of treatment,the Hp eradication rate was 89.4%in the treatment group, and 88.3% in the control group(P>0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in the treatment group (16.7%)was significantly lower than that in the control group (36.7%)(P<0.05).Conclusions The 10-day moxifloxacin,esomeprazole plus furazolidone triple therapy is effective and well-tolerated as first-line treatment to eradicate Hp with samilar efficacy and fewer adverse reactions compared to the 14-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy.

Background and purpose:To perform whole mount technique in the diagnosis of the prostate cancer could provide orientation to the specimen. Whole mount technique has great value in pathologic diagnosis and morphological research. However, limited by the specimen-making technique, shortage of equipment and heavy workload, this technique has not been generally accepted in China. The aim of this study was to evaluate the signiifcance of whole mount technique in the diagnosis of the prostate cancer by comparing the clinical and pathological variables between whole mount patients and conventional ones after radical prostatectomy (RP).Methods:A total number of 229 patients’ whole mount RP specimens were recruited in the study from Dec. 2012 to Feb. 2014. The control group included 393 patients’ specimens which underwent conventional sampling from Jan. 2010 to Jun. 2012. We compared the clinical and pathological variables between the groups, including age, preoperative PSA level, methods of diagnosis, preliminary diagnostic Gleason score, clinical T stage, postoperative Gleason score, pathological T stage, positive surgical margin, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion and pelvic lymph node metastasis.Results:Two groups shared similar preoperative parameters. Also there was no signiifcant difference between the whole mount and the conventional sampling groups in postoperative Gleason score, pathological T stage, extraprostatic extension and pelvic lymph node metastasis. However, positive surgical margin and seminal vesicle invasion rates were much higher in the whole mount group than the control one and both of the differences reached statistical signiifcance (26.2%vs 17.6%, 23.1%vs 17.0%;P=0.010, 0.025)Conclusion:After compared the clinical and pathological variables, we could conclude that whole mount technique has prevalence in the diagnosis of the positive surgical margin and seminal vesicle invasion compared with the conventional sampling technique. Thus, whole mount technique should be strongly recommended in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.