1.Biting behaviour of medically important mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Peninsular Malaysia
Chen, C.D. ; Wan-Norafikah, O. ; Nurin-Zulkifli, I.M. ; Faezah, K. ; Izzul, A.A. ; Abdullah, A.G. ; Lau, K.W. ; Norma-Rashid, Y. ; Sofian-Azirun, M.
Tropical Biomedicine 2017;34(1):199-211
Human-landing catch (HLC) technique was undertaken in nine selected study sites
within Peninsular Malaysia to determine the biting cycle of Aedes, Armigeres, Culex, and
Mansonia mosquitoes. HLC was conducted 24 hours on three different nights in a duration of
one week at each study site. Aedes albopictus were found in all study sites with bimodal
biting cycle, whereas the biting peak of Aedes butleri was recorded between 1600 and 1900
hr. For Armigeres, five study sites demonstrated similar biting peak hour (1900 – 2000 hr) for
Ar. kesseli four study sites showed biting peak at 1800 – 1900 hr for Ar. subalbatus. Culex
quinquefasciatus was collected from all study sites except in Sungai Penchala with its biting
activity beginning from 1900 hr. Both Mansonia annulifera and Mansonia uniformis captured
in two different study sites showed similar biting peaks (1500 – 1600 hr). It is recommended
that vector control activities be carried out at dusk as almost all mosquito species captured
started their biting activities at that time.
2.Molecular detection of Candidatus Anaplasma camelii in camels (Camelus dromedarius) from Asir Province, Saudi Arabia
Alshahrani, M.Y. ; Alanazi, A.D. ; Alouffi, A.S. ; Abdullah, H.H.A.M. ; Allam, A.M. ; Mahmoud, M.S. ; Abdel-Shafy, S. ; Alfaifi, M.H. ; Alkhathami, A.G.
Tropical Biomedicine 2020;37(No.3):587-598
Knowledge of molecular identification of tick-borne pathogens in camels in Saudi Arabia is very limited; few molecular epidemiological studies have been under taken. This study was to detect Anaplasma spp. and Piroplasma spp. in camels from Asir Province, Saudi Arabia. A total of 150 blood samples were collected from camels in Asir Province and investigated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) that targeted 18S rRNA and 23S rRNA to detect the DNA of Piroplasma spp. and Anaplasma spp., respectively. The positive samples for 23S rRNA were assayed again by PCR targeting the 16S rRNA. All the blood samples were free from Piroplasma spp. infection. Three camels (2%) were found to be positive for Anaplasma infection through use of PCR that targeted the 23S rRNA gene. There were no significant differences between ages or sexes in the camels that tested positive for Anaplasma. All positive Anaplasma infections were recorded in camels that were infested by ticks. Two Anaplasma sequences for the16S rRNA gene were deposited in GenBank with accession numbers MN882724 and MN882725. They recorded 99.16% and 99.34% similarities (respectively) with KF843825.1 (Candidatus Anaplasma camelii reported in Unizah, Saudi Arabia). Phylogenetic analyses revealed that the two sequences recorded in this study were close to each other; both were located in one cluster with Candidatus Anaplasma camelii isolates that were recorded before in the adjacent areas of Unizah in Saudi Arabia and Iran. In conclusion: two new Anaplasma genotypes close to Candidatus Anaplasma camelii were found in camels in Asir Province, Saudi Arabia for the first time. The camels in this province were found to be free of Piroplasma infection.