1.Multiple Nail Gun Penetrating Head Injury: A Case Report
Sim SK ; Theophilus SC ; Noor Azman AR
The International Medical Journal Malaysia 2013;12(2):75-78
Intracranial nail gun injury is a rare subset of penetrating head injury. Here we report a case of intracranial
nail gun injury in a Vietnamese patient who attempted suicide with no neurological deficit. Three nails were
launched. Because the nail head acted as a brake, the launched nail could make a hole into the skull but could
not entirely pass it. A rational management strategy should permit these patients to be discharged with no
additional injury. Some medical and surgical management in penetrating head injury are discussed. The use of
antibiotics and antiepileptic drugs and the retraction of the nail aided by the performance of a craniotomy
surrounding the entry point are recommended.
2.The Spetzler-Martin Grading System and Management of Patients with Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformation in a Tertiary Referral Hospital
SA Al-Edrus ; SN Suhaimi ; AR Noor Azman ; AZ Latif ; M Sobri
Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences 2010;6(1):91-99
Introduction:An arteriovenous malformation (AVM) is an abnormal collection of blood vessels in which arterial blood flows directly into the draining vein without the normal interposed capillaries. The Spetzler-Martin grading system has been widely accepted worldwide to estimate the pretreatment risks and predict the outcome of patients with intracranial AVM. In Malaysia, we still do not have the baseline data of this grading system. Methods: A total of 33 patients from a tertiary referral hospital diagnosed with intracranial AVM based on neuroimaging findings over a 4-year period were studied. Medical records were traced and neuroimaging findings were analysed. The AVMs were graded according to the Spetzler-Martin grading system and Fisher's exact test was used to assess statistical difference between the grades of the AVM and management plan for the patients. Results: Four patients were graded as Grade 1, 9 patients as Grade II, 10 patients as Grade III, 6 patients as Grade IV and 4 patients as grade V.Ten patients were treated conservatively; six patients underwent surgery and embolisationrespectively. Statistically significant difference (p=0.016) was found between the Spetzler-Martin grading system and the management of intracranial AVMs. Conclusion: The management decision was not made based on the grading of the AVMs. It is recommended that all AVM patients be routinely graded according to this system prior to treatment