1.A comparative evaluation of dengue diagnostic tests based on single acute serum samples for laboratory confi rmation of acute dengue
CHUA KB ; MUSTAFA B ; ABDUL WAHAB AH ; CHEM YK ; KHAIRUL AH ; KUMARASAMY V ; MARIAM M ; NURHASMIMI H ; ABDUL RASID K
The Malaysian Journal of Pathology 2011;33(1):13-20
A prospective study was carried out to evaluate the sensitivity of dengue NS1 antigen-capture
ELISA in comparison with dengue virus isolation, conventional RT-PCR and real-time RT-PCR for
laboratory confi rmation of acute dengue based on single-acute serum samples. Four primary healthcare
centres were involved to recruit patients with clinical diagnosis of dengue illness. Patient’s
demographic, epidemiological and clinical information were collected on a standardized data entry
form and 5 ml of venous blood was collected upon consent. In the laboratory, six types of laboratory
tests were performed on each of the collected acute serum sample.
Of the 558 acute serum samples collected from 558 patients with clinical diagnosis of dengue
from mid-August 2006 to March 2009, 174 serum samples were tested positive by the dengue NS1
antigen-capture ELISA, 77 by virus isolation, 92 by RT-PCR and 112 by real-time RT-PCR. A total
of 190 serum samples were tested positive by either one or a combination of the four methods
whereas, only 59 serum samples were tested positive by all four methods. Thus, based on singleacute
serum samples, 190 of the 558 patients (34.1%) were laboratory-confi rmed acute dengue. The
overall test sensitivity was 91.6%, 40.5%, 48.4% and 58.9% for dengue NS1 antigen-capture ELISA,
virus isolation, conventional RT-PCR and real-time RT-PCR respectively. Statistically, dengue NS1
antigen-capture ELISA was the most sensitive and virus isolation was the least sensitive test for the
laboratory confi rmation of acute dengue based on single-acute serum specimens. Real-time RT-PCR
was signifi cantly more sensitive than the conventional RT-PCR.
2.Angular Deformities of the Knee in Children Treated with Guided Growth
Jamil K ; Yahaya MY ; Abd-Rasid AF ; Ibrahim S ; Abdul-Rashid AH
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2021;15(No.2):26-35
Introduction: The guided growth technique is an alternative
to corrective osteotomy for treating angular deformities of
the extremities. It has the advantage of being minimally
invasive and is effective in a growing child. This study
reports on the outcome of guided growth technique using a
plate in correcting knee angular deformities.
Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective study
of children with angular deformity of the knee treated by the
guided growth technique from January 2010 to December
2015 in a tertiary centre. The guided growth technique was
done using either the flexible titanium plate (8-plate) or the 2-
hole reconstruction plate. Correction of deformity was
assessed on radiographs by evaluating the mechanical axis
deviation and tibiofemoral angle. The implants were removed
once deformity correction was achieved.
Results: A total of 17 patients (27 knees) were evaluated.
Twenty-two knees (81.5%) achieved complete correction of
the deformity. The median age was 4.0 (interquartile range
3.0-6.0) years and the median Body Mass Index (BMI) was
26.0 (25.0-28.0). There were 7 unilateral and 10 bilateral
deformities with different pathologies (14 tibia vara, 3 genu
valgus). The median rate of correction was 0.71° per month.
One patient (1 knee) had screw pull-out and two patients (4
knees) had broken screws in the proximal tibia. Three
patients (5 knees) failed to achieve complete correction and
were subsequently treated with corrective osteotomies. Out
of five patients (8 knees) who were followed-up for at least
12 months after removal of hardware, two had rebound
deformities. No permanent growth retardation occurred in
our patients.
Conclusion: Our outcome for guided growth to correct knee
angular deformity was similar to other studies. Guided
growth is safe to perform in children below 12 years old and
has good outcome in idiopathic genu valgus and Langeskiold
II for tibia vara. Patients should be observed for recurrence
until skeletal maturity following implant removal.