1.Randomized Control Trial Study On The Effect Of Wet Cupping On Lipid Profile
Suhaily Mohd Hairon (Suhaily MH), DrPH ; Ab Aziz Al-Safi Ismail (Ismail AA), PhD
The International Medical Journal Malaysia 2017;16(2):11-17
Dyslipidaemia is one of the risk factors contributing to the pathogenesis of cardiovascular
diseases (CVDs). This study was conducted to investigate the effect of wet cupping on lipid profile.
Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in 2012 at the School of Medical Sciences,
Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia. Sixty-two healthy volunteers ranging from 30 to 60 years old were
randomized into control and intervention groups. Subjects in the intervention group were assigned to two
sessions of wet cupping at the beginning of the study and at the third month; individuals in the control group
did not undergo any cupping procedure. Venous blood sample was collected for serum lipid profile: Total
Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C),
and triglycerides; measured at baseline, first, third and fourth month. Results: Subjects in the cupping
group had significant improvements from baseline to third and fourth month for TC (MD=-0.56, P=0.004),
HDL-C (MD=-0.22, P<0.001) and LDL-C (MD=0.58, P=0.001). There was also a significant reduction from
baseline to one month for triglycerides (MD=0.38, P<0.001). Subjects in the cupping group had significantly
better values in HDL-C and LDL-C as compared with the control group at the third and fourth month.
Significantly lower levels of TC and triglycerides in the cupping group of the fourth month. In the control
group, there were no significant changes in any serum lipid profiles. Conclusion: After two sessions of wet
cupping, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C and triglycerides were significantly improved by 8.2%, 13.7%, 16.4% and 20.8%
respectively.
2.A mimicry of melioidosis by Klebsiella ozaenae infection
TH Ng ; SH How ; YC Kuan ; Adzura ; AA Aziz ; AR Fauzi
The Malaysian Journal of Pathology 2009;31(2):147-150
Klebsiella ozaenae is a Gram negative bacillus. It has been described as a colonizer of oral and
nasopharyngeal mucosa and is a cause of atrophic rhinitis. Klebsiella ozaenae has seldom been
isolated from serious infections. However, several reports have stated that Klebsiella ozaenae may
cause invasive infections and even mortality. We report a 55-year-old man with Klebsiella ozaenae
infection causing abscesses involving the right eye and left kidney and possibly also in the brain,
lungs and prostate. The isolates were sensitive to ceftazidime, ciprofl oxacin, chloramphenicol,
gentamicin and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim but resistant to ampicillin. He responded well to
4 weeks of IV ceftazidime and IV amoxycillin-clavulanic acid. To our knowledge, such a multiorgan
infection has not been reported previously for this organism.
3.External Marker in Bisecting-Angle-Technique: A New Approach to Minimize Dental Radiographic Error
Azizah AF ; Muhamad Aqil AA ; Mohd Amirul Z ; Atika A
Medicine and Health 2017;12(2):304-311
Bisecting-angle-technique is a method used to improve patient comfort during periapical radiography. This technique is usually performed without X-ray beam aiming device and has been commonly associated with dental radiographic error. The use of external marker as a beam aiming device in bisecting-angle-technique is potentially effective to reduce the number of errors occurring during periapical radiography. In this study, 240 periapical radiographs were taken by undergraduate dental students. Periapical radiographs were taken using traditional method of bisecting-angle-technique (BAT), bisecting-angle-technique with the use of external marker (BAT-M) and the standard method in periapical radiography; paralleling technique (PT). All radiographic images were evaluated and errors were classified and tabled according to the type and number of errors. Chi-square test was used to compare the total number of radiographic errors made using these three techniques. One of the most common errors with BAT was cone cut error (13.8%). This error had been markedly reduced to 1.3% and 2.5% by implementation of BAT-M and PT, respectively. The total number of errors was also found to be significantly lesser for BAT-M compared to BAT, p< 0.05.