BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study assessed the efficacy of a rifaximin plus levofloxacin-based rescue regimen in patients that had failed both triple and quadruple standard regimens for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. METHODS: We treated patients for H. pylori between August 2009 and April 2011. The triple regimen consisted of combined treatment with amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and pantoprazole for 1 week. For failed cases, a quadruple regimen of tetracycline, metronidazole, bismuth dicitrate, and lansoprazole for 1 week was administered. The rescue regimen for persistently refractory cases was rifaximin 200 mg t.i.d., levofloxacin 500 mg q.d., and lansoprazole 15 mg b.i.d. for 1 week. RESULTS: In total, 482 patients were enrolled in this study. The eradication rates associated with the first and second regimens were 58% and 60%, respectively. Forty-seven out of 58 patients who failed with the second-line regimen received rifaximin plus levofloxacin-based third-line therapy. The eradication rate for the third regimen was 65%. The cumulative eradication rates were 58%, 85%, and 96% for each regimen, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A rifaximin plus levofloxacin-based regimen could be an alternative rescue therapy in patients with resistance to both triple and quadruple regimens for the eradication of H. pylori.
2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles ; Amoxicillin ; Bismuth ; Clarithromycin ; Helicobacter ; Helicobacter pylori ; Humans ; Metronidazole ; Ofloxacin ; Rifamycins ; Tetracycline

Therapeutics; Helicobacter pylori; Duodenal Ulcer; Stomach Ulcer; Pharmaceutical Preparations; 2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles; Amoxicillin; Clarithromycin Study on the effect of PAC500 regimen in the treatment of peptic ulcer disease with H. pylori (+) in 33 patients. The results showed that, this regimen is good with the mean value of pain relief is 6.5 days in addition to the high percentage of ulcer healing (96.9%: protocol and 93.9%: intention of treatment) and the high percentage of H.pylori eradication (87.5%: protocol and 84.8%: intention of treatment). Beside, there is an improvement of the acute gastritis lesion on gastric mucosa after the eradication. But the high percentage of side-effects (81.8%) must be considered, bitter sensation of the mouth is the most common and can be tolerated. Reported only 1 case had to withdraw this trial because of vomitting side-effect
Therapeutics ; Helicobacter pylori ; Duodenal Ulcer ; Stomach Ulcer ; Pharmaceutical Preparations ; 2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles ; Amoxicillin ; Clarithromycin

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The diagnostic proton pump inhibitor test (PPI test) is a method used in diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study aimed to determine the appropriate dose of lansoprazole for use in the diagnostic test for GERD. METHODS: This study was a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial in the Daegu-Gyeongbuk area. Patients with typical reflux symptoms such as regurgitation and heartburn for at least three months were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into two groups, the erosive reflux disease (ERD) group and the non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) group, and randomized to 14 days of treatment with lansoprazole at a dose of 15 mg, 30 mg or 60 mg once daily. The PPI test was considered positive if the patient's symptoms improved by more than 50%. RESULTS: A total of 218 patients were enrolled, and analysis was performed on the 188 patients who completed the study. The PPI test was positive in 93.2% of the ERD group and 87.2% of the NERD group. A positive PPI test was observed in 91.7%, 89.4%, and 87.2% of the 15 mg, 30 mg, and 60 mg groups, respectively. Significant symptom score changes were observed starting on day 8 for the 15 mg, 30 mg, and 60 mg groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter, randomized study of Korean patients, the standard dose of lansoprazole was as effective as a high dose of lansoprazole in relieving the symptoms of GERD, regardless of the presence of ERD, by day 14 of treatment.
2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; Heartburn ; Humans ; Proton Pumps

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Several rescue therapies have been recommended to eradicate Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with a failure of first-line eradication therapy, but they still fail in more than 20% of cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of levofloxacin, metronidazole, and lansoprazole (LML) triple therapy relative to quadruple therapy as a second-line treatment. METHODS: In total, 113 patients who failed first-line triple therapy for H. pylori infection were randomly assigned to two groups: LML for 7 days and tetracycline, bismuth subcitrate, metronidazole and lansoprazole (quadruple) for 7 days. RESULTS: According to intention-to-treat analysis, the infection was eradicated in 38 of 56 patients (67.9%) in the LML group and 48 of 57 (84.2%) in the quadruple group (p=0.042). Per-protocol analysis showed successful eradication in 38 of 52 patients (73.1%) from the LML group and 48 of 52 (92.3%) from the quadruple group (p=0.010). There were no significant differences in the adverse effects in either treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: LML therapy is less effective than quadruple therapy as a second-line treatment for H. pylori infection. Therefore, quadruple therapy should be considered as the primary second-line strategy for patients experiencing a failure of first-line H. pylori therapy in Korea.
2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles ; Bismuth ; Helicobacter ; Helicobacter pylori ; Humans ; Korea ; Metronidazole ; Ofloxacin ; Organometallic Compounds ; Tetracycline

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The CYP2C19 polymorphism plays an important role in the metabolism of various proton-pump inhibitors. Several trials have produced conflicting data on eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) among CYP2C19 genotypes. We investigated whether the CYP2C19 genotype affects the eradication rate of H. pylori by direct comparing the effects of lansoprazole- and rabeprazole-based triple therapies. METHODS: A total of 492 patients infected with H. pylori was randomly treated with either 30 mg of lansoprazole or 20 mg of rabeprazole plus 500 mg of clarithromycin and 1,000 mg of amoxicillin twice daily for 1 week. CYP2C19 genotype status was determined by a PCR-restriction-fragment-length polymorphism method. After 7 to 8 weeks, H. pylori status was evaluated by a C(13)-urea breath test. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty-three patients were analyzed, and the eradication rate was 75.2% in a per-protocol analysis. Eradication rates for the lansoprazole regimen (n=234) were 73.8%, 80.7%, and 85.4% in the homozygous extensive (HomEM), heterozygous extensive (HetEM), and poor metabolizers (PM) groups, respectively (p=0.303). In the case of the rabeprazole regimen (n=229), the eradication rates were 68.6%, 73.0%, and 71.9% in the HomEM, HetEM, and PM groups, respectively (p=0.795). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacies of triple therapies that include lansoprazole or rabeprazole are not affected by CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms.
2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles ; Amoxicillin ; Breath Tests ; Clarithromycin ; Genotype ; Helicobacter ; Helicobacter pylori ; Humans ; Polymorphism, Genetic ; Prospective Studies

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and cost efficiency of omeprazole 10 mg and rabeprazole 10 mg once daily for 24 weeks in the maintenance therapy. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label study enrolling 279 patients with erosive esophagitis A or B (Los Angeles classification) and typical gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms. Patients who showed complete endoscopic and symptomatic healing after 8 weeks of proton pump inhibitor treatment were randomly allocated to maintenance treatment with omeprazole 10 mg once daily or rabeprazole 10 mg once daily for 42 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with symptomatic remission at 42 weeks. RESULTS: At the end of 42 weeks of maintenance therapy, 96.4% of omeprazole and 95.1% of rabeprazole treated patients remained symptom free (P > 0.05). Two drugs were also comparable with regard to the severity and frequency of reflux symptoms during the maintenance phase (P > 0.05). By the cost-minimization analysis, the mean total costs per patient for remaining symptom-free for 6 months were 241,775 won for omeprazole and 287,115 won for rabeprazole, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Omeprazole 10 mg appeared to have similar efficacy in maintaining symptomatic remission as rabeprazole 10 mg, but was superior to rabeprazole 10 mg in terms of cost efficiency in the maintenance therapy of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms.
2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Esophagitis ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; Humans ; Omeprazole ; Proton Pumps

PURPOSE: Human factor is one of the major causes of medication errors. The purpose of this study was to identify nurses' perception and experience of medication errors, examine the relationship of Dominance, Influence, Steadiness, Conscientiousness (DISC) behavior patterns and medication errors by nurses. METHODS: A descriptive survey design with a convenience sampling was used. Data collection was done using self-report questionnaires answered by 308 nurses from one university hospital and two general hospitals. RESULTS: The most frequent DISC behavioral style of nurses was influence style (41.9%), followed by steadiness style (23.7%), conscientiousness style (20.4%), and dominance style (14.0%). Differences in the perception and experience level of medication errors by nurses' behavioral pattern were not statistically significant. However, nurses with conscientiousness style had the lowest scores for in experience of medication errors and the highest scores for perception of medication errors. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that identification of the behavior pattern of nurses and application of this education program can prevent medication errors by nurses in hospitals.
2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles ; Dacarbazine ; Data Collection ; Fibrinogen ; Humans ; Medication Errors ; Surveys and Questionnaires

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Ecabet sodium is known for its bactericidal effect against H. pylori. It was reported that a supplement of ecabet sodium to conventional triple therapy showed good results in Asia. The Aim of this study was to ascertain the efficacy of additional ecabet sodium on conventional triple therapy for eradication of H. pylori. METHODS: We reviewed the cases of 111 patients (Group A) with H. pylori infection who received ecabet sodium with triple therapy (20 mg of rabeprazole, 1 g of amoxicillin, 500 mg of clarithromycin and 1 g of ecabet sodium, twice daily for 7 days). Another 186 patients (Group B) received PPI-based triple therapy (same as the above, except without the ecabet sodium). Eradication was evaluated 4 weeks later after completion of treatment by 13C-UBT. RESULTS: Eradication rates were 74.8% (83/111) in group A and 70.4% (131/186) in group B by intention-to-treat analysis (p=0.420), and 75.2% (82/109) in group A and 70.7% (128/181) in group B by per protocol analysis (p=0.405). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of ecabet sodium to conventional triple therapy did not increase the eradication rate of H. pylori in this study. These findings imply that ecabet sodium as an additional agent cannot overcome antibiotic resistance, which is the most important cause of failure of triple therapy.
2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles ; Amoxicillin ; Asia ; Clarithromycin ; Diterpenes, Abietane ; Drug Resistance, Microbial ; Helicobacter ; Helicobacter pylori ; Humans ; Korea ; Sodium

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the eradication rate of a triple therapy regimen that included a proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, and tetracycline instead of clarithromycin in treatment-Naive patients and in patients who did not respond to standard triple therapy. METHODS: This study included 110 patients infected with Helicobacter pylori. Patients in groups A and B were treatment-Naive, and those in group C were not responsive to previous standard triple therapy. Patients in group A (n=40) received lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin 1,000 mg b.i.d., and clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. for 14 days. Patients in groups B (n=40) and C (n=30) received lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin 1,000 mg b.i.d., and tetracycline 500 mg q.i.d. for 14 days. RESULTS: In group A, eradication was achieved in 18 (45%) of the 40 patients included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and in 18 (47.4%) of the 38 patients included in the per-protocol (PP) analysis. In group B, eradication was achieved in 15 (37.5%) of the 40 patients included in the ITT analysis and in 15 (39.3%) of the 38 patients included in the PP analysis. In group C, eradication was achieved in 14 (46.6%) of the 30 patients included in the ITT analysis and in 14 (43.8%) of the 29 patients included in the PP analysis. There was no statistically significant difference among the 3 groups with regard to eradication rates (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the low rate of resistance to tetracycline, the combination of lansoprazole, amoxicillin, and tetracycline instead of clarithromycin is not a good option for the eradication of H. pylori.
2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles ; Amoxicillin ; Clarithromycin ; Helicobacter ; Helicobacter pylori ; Humans ; Pilot Projects ; Proton Pumps ; Tetracycline

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) currently serves as the minimally invasive treatment of choice for early gastric cancer and premalignant lesions of the stomach. There have been few studies addressing whether a proton pump inhibitor or a histamine 2-receptor antagonist is the most effective treatment for iatrogenic ulcers after EMR. We compared the effectiveness of pantoprazole and famotidine in treating iatrogenic ulcers and preventing bleeding after EMR without endoscopic submucosal dissection. METHODS: Between March 2006 and April 2007, we retrospectively analyzed the effect of famotidine (40 mg/day) and pantoprazole (40 mg/day) on the healing of iatrogenic ulcers and control of bleeding after EMR. RESULTS: During the study period, 126 patients underwent EMR. Eighty-one received famotidine, and 45 received pantoprazole. The mean duration of drug therapy was 44 days in each group. The stages of ulcers at 1 to 3 months after EMR were mostly scar stage, and there was no specific difference between the groups. Delayed bleeding was seen after EMR in one patient (1.2%) from the famotidine group and in one patient (2.2%) from the pantoprazole group. There were no other major complications after EMR. CONCLUSIONS: Famotidine was no different than pantoprazole in its effectiveness toward preventing delayed bleeding and promoting healing of iatrogenic ulcers after EMR.
2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles ; Cicatrix ; Famotidine ; Hemorrhage ; Histamine ; Humans ; Proton Pumps ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach ; Stomach Neoplasms ; Ulcer