1.Is Euxyl K400 patch testing useful in the general population?
Ariel CALLERO ; Eva PEREZ-RODRIGUEZ ; Felipe HERAS-MENDAZA ; Juan Antonio MARTINEZ-TADEO ; Jose Carlos GARCIA-ROBAINA ; Luis CONDE-SALAZAR
Asia Pacific Allergy 2017;7(3):171-172
No abstract available.
Patch Tests
2.Result of Patch Test in Kangwon Province.
Young Sik CHOI ; Dong Sik BANG
Korean Journal of Dermatology 1990;28(5):519-526
No abstract available.
Gangwon-do*
;
Patch Tests*
3.Two Cases of Mercury Dermatitis Following Amalgam Dental Restorations.
Mi Hyung CHO ; Hwa Yung AHN ; Hong Il KOOK
Korean Journal of Dermatology 1985;23(5):650-653
Sensitivity to mercury appears to be not uncommon and perhaps the commonest contact with mercury in the general population is by amalgam dental restorations. Recently, we have experienced 2 cases of mercury dermatitis following amalgam dental restorations which were confirmed by the patch test. We report our cases with the patch test results and review the literatue on previous reports.
Dermatitis*
;
Patch Tests
4.Changes of Deviation After the Patch and +3.00 Diopter Spherical Lens Test in Basic Intermittent Exotropia.
Hyun Chul JIN ; Ji Hyun PARK ; Se Youp LEE
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2010;51(12):1620-1624
PURPOSE: To assess the change of deviation angle after the patch test and +3.00 diopter (D) spherical lens test in basic intermittent exotropia. METHODS: The present study included 57 patients diagnosed with basic intermittent exotropia. The deviation angles at near and far before and after monocular occlusion of 40 minutes or more were measured. Afterward, change of deviation was also measured by placing +3.00 D spherical lenses at near. RESULTS: Results from the study revealed pre-occlusion mean deviation angles of 23.1 +/- 7.41 prism diopters (PD) at near, and 23.9 +/- 6.56 PD at far. After the patch test, the mean deviation angles were increased to 28.3 +/- 6.50 PD (p < 0.0001) at near, and 25.5 +/- 6.40 PD (p < 0.0001) at far. After the +3.00 D spherical lens test, the angle was increased to 31.5 +/- 7.53 PD (p < 0.0001) at near. Using the gradient method, the average accommodation convergence - accommodation ratio was 1.4 +/- 1.19 PD/D. CONCLUSIONS: Both the patch test and +3.00 D spherical lens test significantly increased the deviation angles at near and far, they helped to find the maximum deviation angle in patients with basic intermittent exotropia.
Exotropia
;
Humans
;
Patch Tests
5.Quaternium-15 Contact Dermatitis.
Joon Mo YANG ; Hee Chul EUN ; Yoo Shin LEE
Korean Journal of Dermatology 1983;21(5):607-609
Quaternium-15 (Dowicil 200) which is a water-soluble antimicrobial agent and a formaldehyde releaser is widely being used as a preservative in cosmetics and medicaments these days. However, there are scanty reports about it in the Korean literature. Recently, we have experienced two cases of Quaternium-15 contact dermatitis probably related with their cosmetics and topical medicament, respectively. We report our cases with the patch test results.
Dermatitis, Contact*
;
Formaldehyde
;
Patch Tests
6.The influence of H1, H2-histamine antagonists and disulfiram to ethanol and acetaldehyde patch test results.
Shin CHUNG ; Hack Ryul KIM ; Min Kyou LEE
Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association 1991;30(1):54-65
No abstract available.
Acetaldehyde*
;
Disulfiram*
;
Ethanol*
;
Patch Tests*
8.Patch Test of Cosmetic Cleansers for the Determining Optimum Concentration.
Tae Ho PARK ; Moon Chul JEONG ; Jae Hak YOO ; Kea Jeung KIM
Korean Journal of Dermatology 2001;39(7):755-760
BACKGROUND: Cosmetic cleansers are most widely used to remove makeup and sometimes cause allergic or irritation contact dermatitis. We can patch test soaps or shampoos as 2% concentration, but cleansers have been not determined for the concentration by patch test yet. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to determine the concentration of cosmetic cleansers for patch test. METHODS: The skin responses to patch testing with variable cleansers in different concentrations were measured by visual scoring, spectrometer, evaporimeter and corneometer. RESULTS: The results of the studies were summarized as follows; 1. The cream type and lotion type cleansers showed no skin responses. 2. The skin response of foam type cleansers showed that the one had statistical significance between 2% and 5%, and the other had 5% and 10% concentration. 3. The skin response of gel type cleansers showed statistical significance between 5% and 10% concentration. 4. Through correlation analysis, we found that the evaluation of the evaporimeter or corneometer were not related to the visual measurement. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that cosmetic cleansers of water, lotion and cream type can be tested as is(100%), and foam type cleansers with 2%, and gel type should be tested with 5% concentration.
Dermatitis, Contact
;
Patch Tests*
;
Skin
;
Soaps
9.A Case of Allergic Contact Dermatitis due to boric acid.
Il Sun JUN ; Mi Ae LEE ; Mu Hyoung LEE ; Choong Rim HAW
Korean Journal of Dermatology 1994;32(6):1099-1102
Boric acid(H BO) is a weak topical anti infective agent. It can cause acute borism due to the internal absorption. Although the frequency is very rare, boric acid can also induce contact dermat.itis after topical spplication. We present allergic contact dermatitis to boric acid. The patch test results showed a positive reaction to 2% boric acid solution.
Absorption
;
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact*
;
Patch Tests
10.Occupational Contact Urticaria Syndrome Induced by Cefotiam Dihydrochloride in a Nurse.
Hye Jeong CHOI ; Ji Youn SONG ; Young Min PARK ; Chung Won KIM ; Hyung Ok KIM
Annals of Dermatology 2003;15(3):113-115
We herein report a case of occupational contact urticaria syndrome induced by cefotiam di-hydrochloride in a nurse. She had generalized pruritic wheals accompanied by palpitations and tachypnea during the preparation of cefotiam solution. A scratch patch test with cefotiam di-hydrochloride, a major component of cefotiam ingredient showed multiple erythema and wheals within 5 minutes, accompanied by palpitations and tachypnea. No delayed type reaction was observed. Based on her clinical history and scratch test result, we diagnosed her condition as contact urticaria syndrome caused by cefotiam.
Cefotiam*
;
Erythema
;
Patch Tests
;
Tachypnea
;
Urticaria*