1.Most comgortable level and uncomfortable level of hearing in healthy Koreans.
Yun Woo LEE ; Dong Hoon LEE ; Eui Kyung GOH ; Kyong Myong CHON
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 1991;34(4):680-689
No abstract available.
Hearing*
2.Click evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal hearing subjects.
Sun O CHANG ; Ha Won JUNG ; Hun Jong DHONG ; Pil Sang CHUNG ; Kwan Taek NOH
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 1992;35(1):43-49
No abstract available.
Hearing*
3.Auditory sensitivity of 40 Hz event related potential in the hearing impaired subjects.
Cheon Gee JANG ; Young Hoon KIM ; Il Kuk KIM ; Joong Hwan CHO
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 1991;34(6):1169-1174
No abstract available.
Hearing*
4.A review of age-related hearing loss.
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2011;54(9):908-909
No abstract available.
Hearing
;
Hearing Loss
5.Antioxidant Therapy: A Promising Approach to the Prevention of Noise- and Drug-Induced Hearing Loss.
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 2002;45(10):931-935
No abstract available.
Hearing Loss*
;
Hearing*
6.A study on the status of management among workers diagnosed as hearing loss in an iron foundry.
Hyun Sul LIM ; Heon KIM ; Hae Kwan CHEONG
Korean Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 1992;4(2):190-198
No abstract available.
Hearing Loss*
;
Hearing*
;
Iron*
7.The audiological evaluation of cis-platinum induced hearing loss.
Jae Gi CHON ; Cheol Su KIM ; Eui Kyung GOH ; Soo Geun WANG ; Kyong Myong CHON
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 1992;35(5):688-693
No abstract available.
Cisplatin*
;
Hearing Loss*
;
Hearing*
8.Understanding and Assessment of Hereditary Hearing Impairment.
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 2003;46(11):901-914
No abstract available.
Hearing Loss*
;
Hearing*
9.Subjective Satisfaction in Hearing Aid Users by APHAB.
Du Hwan YUN ; Tae Hyun YOON ; Kwang Sun LEE
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 2000;43(7):698-702
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This investigation evaluated the level of subjective satisfaction in hearing aid users by using Abbrieviate Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The APHAB is a subjective evaluation method for hearing aid users. The APHAB consists of 24 items with 4 subscales including Ease of Communication (EC), Reverberation (RV), Background noise (BN), and Aversiveness (AV). 3Ve applied for APHAR to evaluate the subjective satisfaction level in 45 compressive types of hearing aids. The APHAB scores were evaluated according to the types of hearing loss, audiologic patterns of pure tone audiograms, the degree of SRT and the types of hearing aids. In each item, subjects respond to each question on the basis of how they believe the performance of their hearing aid is using a 7-point scale. Subjects were tested both unaided and aided for each specified listening situation. The hearing aid benefit is defined as the diR'erence of percentage between the unaided and aided performance scores. RESULTS: In SRT, moderate hearing loss group showed a higher satisfaction in Ease of Communication, Aversiveness (p<0.05). The group that showed a flat audiogram revealed a higher satisfaction in Ease of Communication, Background noise (p<0.01). There was no significant difference of scores of benefit in types of hearing loss and types of hearing aids. CONCLUSION: Hearing aids are more beneficial in patients who have moderate hearing loss and flat audiogram pattern.
Hearing Aids*
;
Hearing Loss
;
Hearing*
;
Humans
;
Noise
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail