PURPOSE: Alcohol intake is commonly found in injured patients, and alcohol affects base deficit independently with trauma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of alcohol on base deficit in trauma patients. METHODS: Data was retrospectively collected from trauma patients over 18 years of age who were admitted at the emergency center between October 2005 and July 2006. Blood sampling for alcohol level, base deficit evaluation were done within first hour for all patients. Patients were divided according to the serum alcohol level into an alcohol group(serum alcohol level> or =10 mg/dl) and a non-alcohol group. The patients were also stratified into minor (ISS< or =15) and major (ISS> or =16) injury groups according to their injury severity score (ISS). RESULTS: The study enrolled 63 patients of whom 37 fell into the alcohol group and 26 into the non-alcohol group. The mean alcohol level within the alcohol group was 210+/-85 mg/dl. Base deficit and serum lactate were not found to be significantly different in minor and major injuries, and ISS, base deficit were not significantly different with serum alcohol level. Base deficit was somewhat higher on average but not statistically significant in the non-alcohol group than in the alcohol group (-3.0+/-4.5 vs. -1.8+/-6.7 mmol/L, p=0.444). The base deficit was higher for the major injury-alcohol group than for the major injury-non-alcohol group, but this difference also did not achieve statistical significance (-4.6 +/-5.8 vs -2.4+/-8.1 mmol/L, p=0.117) CONCLUSION: In the severely injured patients, base deficit appears to be increased with alcohol but we found no statistically significant differences in base deficit and ISS between alcohol group and non-alcohol group of injured patients.
Emergencies ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Lactic Acid ; Retrospective Studies

No abstract available.
Accidents, Traffic* ; Emergencies* ; Emergency Service, Hospital* ; Injury Severity Score*

PURPOSE: To study the clinical results of AO type C pelvic ring injuries and identify the prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 25 patients were treated for C type pelvic ring fractures between January 1995 and August 2002. The injury mechanism, associated injuries, time from injury to surgery, ICU care, Injury Severity Score, fracture site of posterior ring, displacement, surgical method, and complications were analyzed. Radiological and clinical evaluations of the results were conducted using the Majeed's score. Of the 25 patients, 16 were male, 9 were female, with an average age of 41.6 years. All except one patient had associated injuries and 12 patients had neurological complications. There were 17, 7 and 1 case of C1, C2 and C3 type injuries respectively. Twenty three cases underwent surgical treatment. RESULTS: The average Majeed's score was 66.6 points, and 15 patients (60%) had good or excellent results. The complications included 3 cases of non-union and 1 case of SI joint infection were complications. The clinical results were worse in those patients with neurological symptoms. CONCLUSION: Satisfactory results were obtained after surgical treatment of C type pelvic ring injuries. Neurological injuries affected the clinical outcome and appropriate fixation of the anterior ring was needed for stable fixation of C type pelvic ring injuries.
Female ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Joints ; Male ; Pelvis

The TRISS (Revised Trauma Score and Injury Severity Score) method of trauma care evaluation was applied to 476 consecutive trauma patients admitted to our medical center over a 6-month period. Male to female ratio was 8:1, with a mean age of 24.7 years. Penetrating injury was the most common mechanism of injury (62%), with the chest as the most common region injured (36%). Mean probability of survival of 476 patients was 0.9802 and a predicted mortality of 9.4 patients. The overall mortality was 5.4 per cent with 26 actual deaths. As 93 per cent of patients had injuries to isolated anatomic regions, using the TRISS method, assigning numerical values to noninjured anatomic regions mathematically increased their probability of survival, even though the isolated injury was life-threatening. Consideration should be taken before adapting the TRISS method as the gold standard in evaluating trauma care in the local setting

PURPOSE: To estimate the incidence and risk of significant renal injury quantitatively in the admitted patients with abdominal trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1992 to July 1997, 511 patients who admitted to departments of urology and general surgery due to major abdominal trauma with and without renal injury were included in this study. The risk of renal injury was defined as the percentage of square of Abbreviated Injury Scale of kidney in the Injury Severity Score(ISS) per each patient. The patients were classified to 5 groups according to the causes of trauma as traffic accident, falls, assault, other blunt and stab Injury, then compared the incidence and risk of renal injury each other. RESULTS: The overall incidence of significant renal injury was 14.9%, and the incidence according to the causes was 27.0%,20.8%, 16.1%, 14.3% and 10.7% in falls, assault, stab injury, other blunt and traffic accident, respectively. The overall risk of significant renal injury estimated by ISS was 15.7% and the risk according to the causes was 26.7%,24.9%, 11.9%,9.9% and 4.9% in assault, falls, traffic accident, other blunt and stab injury, respectively Mean ISS in the patients with renal injury was markedly higher than that of the patients without renal injury(27.5 vs 13.6)(p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that both the incidence and risk of significant renal injury in the admitted patients with abdominal trauma can be expected in the probability of 15% or so, and according to the causes, those in the traumatized patients by the assault and falls mark high.
Abbreviated Injury Scale ; Accidents, Traffic ; Humans ; Incidence* ; Injury Severity Score ; Kidney ; Urology

Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury ; pathology ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Liver ; pathology

OBJECTIVE: To compare the predictive power of International Classification of Diseases 10th Edition(ICD-10) based International Classification of Diseases based Injury Severity Score(ICISS) with Trauma and Injury Severity Score(TRISS) and International Classification of Diseases 9th Edition Clinical Modification(ICD-9CM) based ICISS in the injury severity measure. METHODS: ICD-10 version of Survival Risk Ratios(SRRs) was derived from 47,750 trauma patients from 35 Emergency Centers for 1 year. The predictive power of TRISS, the ICD-9CM based ICISS and ICD-10 based ICISS were compared in a group of 367 severely injured patients admitted to two university hospitals. The predictive power was compared by using the measures of discrimination(disparity, sensitivity, specificity, misclassification rates, and ROC curve analysis) and calibration(Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistics), all calculated by logistic regression procedure. RESULTS: ICD-10 based ICISS showed a lower performance than TRISS and ICD-9CM based ICISS. When age and Revised Trauma Score(RTS) were incorporated into the survival probability model, however, ICD-10 based ICISS full model showed a similar predictive power compared with TRISS and ICD-9CM based ICISS full model. ICD-10 based ICISS had some disadvantages in predicting outcomes among patients with intracranial injuries. However, such weakness was largely compensated by incorporating age and RTS in the model. CONCLUSIONS: The ICISS methodology can be extended to ICD-10 horizon as a standard injury severity measure in the place of TRISS, especially when age and RTS were incorporated in the model. In patients with intracranial injuries, the predictive power of ICD-10 based ICISS was relatively low because of differences in the classifying system between ICD-10 and ICD-9CM.
Emergencies ; Hospitals, University ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; International Classification of Diseases* ; Logistic Models ; ROC Curve ; Sensitivity and Specificity

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to investigate preventable trauma death and trauma care errors contributing to death on Jeju Island. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on all trauma deaths between January 2008 and May 2010 at five emergency departments (ED) in Jeju. Of the 165 deaths, 101 patients included for study after excluding death within one hour or after one week. Injury severity was scored according to the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and survival probability (Ps) was calculated. Trauma care errors were coded to six categories: pre-hospital, ED, operating room, intensive care unit, general ward, and inter-hospital transfer. In addition, system inadequacy, problems in treatment, diagnosis, and procedures were analyzed. Patient records were reviewed independently and preventability was determined by agreement. RESULTS: The preventable death rate was 35.6%, and the mean ISS was 25.25+/-10.78. Of all 149 inappropriate cares, 66.4% contributed to death. Of the 121 treatment-related problems, 88 problems occurred in the ED. Of the 18 system-related problems, 12 were in the pre-hospital phase. Seventy of the 96 problems associated with deaths occurred in the ED, and 12 of 29 problems in the pre-hospital phase. CONCLUSION: The preventable death rate was high. Inappropriate care rendered in the treatment process in the ED and system-related errors in the pre-hospital phase were major contributors to preventable trauma deaths. To reduce preventable deaths, more efforts are required on organizing trauma team management and improving care errors during the pre-hospital and inter-hospital transfer.
Emergencies ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Intensive Care Units ; Operating Rooms ; Patients' Rooms ; Republic of Korea ; Retrospective Studies

OBJECTIVE: Despite several limitations, the Trauma Injury Severity Score (TRISS) is normally used to evaluate trauma systems. The aim of this study was to evaluate the preventable trauma death rate using the TRISS method in severe trauma patients with traumatic brain injury using our emergency department data. METHODS: The use of the TRISS formula has been suggested to consider definitively preventable death (DP); the deaths occurred with a probability of survival (Ps) higher than 0.50 and possible preventable death (PP); the deaths occurred with a Ps between 0.50 and 0.25. Deaths in patients with a calculated Ps of less than 0.25 is considered as no-preventable death (NP). A retrospective case review of deaths attributed to mechanical trauma occurring between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2011 was conducted. RESULTS: A total of 565 consecutive severe trauma patients with ISS>15 or Revised Trauma Score<7 were admitted in our institute. We excluded a total of 24 patients from our analysis : 22 patients younger than 15 years, and 2 patients with burned injury. Of these, 221 patients with head injury were analyzed in the final study. One hundred eighty-two patients were in DP, 13 in PP and 24 in NP. The calculated predicted mortality rates were 11.13%, 59.04%, and 90.09%. The actual mortality rates were 12.64%, 61.547%, and 91.67%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although it needs to make some improvements, the present study showed that TRISS performed well in predicting survival of traumatic brain injured patients. Also, TRISS is relatively exact and acceptable compared with actual data, as a simple and time-saving method.
Brain ; Brain Injuries ; Craniocerebral Trauma ; Emergencies ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Retrospective Studies

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess healthrelated quality of life (HRQOL), to compare HRQOL of 3 months after injury with 10 days after injury, and to offer the result of this study to basic data of HRQOL in Korean patients with injury. METHODS: Between November 1, 2003, and March 2, 2004, 100 eligible injury patients who had visited emergency center were enrolled in the study. HRQOL was measured by Korean EuroQol 5 dimensions (KEQ-5D), and assessed in 10 days and 3 months after injury. The severity of injury was measured by Injury Severity Score (ISS). RESULTS: Of the 100 subjects, 54 (54%) were men and 46 (46%) were women, with mean (+/-SD) age of 43.7 (+/-15.2) and mean ISS (+/-SD) of 4.45 (+/-4.38). The KEQ-5D utility index and 5 subdimensional scores of 3 months after injury were significantly higher than those of 10 days after injury. The KEQ-5D utility indexes of 3 months after injury of each group by the ISS, age, sex, educational status and marrital status had significant higher than those of 10 days after injury. CONCLUSION: In this study, we observed that HRLOQ in patients with 3 months after injury was higher than those with 10 days after injury. However, to define the more definite feature of HRLOQ in patients with injury, the study with more and large epidemiologic controlled injury group and detailed variable adjustment should be done.
Educational Status ; Emergencies ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies* ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Male ; Quality of Life*