1.T Cell Differentiation and Th17.
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 2008;51(8):688-693
No abstract available.
Cell Differentiation
2.A Rare Case of Mesothelioma Showing Micropapillary and Small Cell Differentiation with Aggressive Behavior.
Yoon Jin CHA ; Binnari KIM ; Joungho HAN ; Chin A YI ; Jae Ill ZO
Korean Journal of Pathology 2014;48(6):466-468
No abstract available.
Cell Differentiation*
;
Mesothelioma*
3.Polarity of ameloblasts and odontoblasts and their related regulators.
Yi-Jun ZHOU ; Guang-Xing YAN ; Cang-Wei LIU ; Xue ZHANG ; Yue HU ; Xin-Qing HAO ; Huan ZHAO ; Ce SHI ; Hong-Chen SUN
West China Journal of Stomatology 2019;37(3):309-313
The polarity of ameloblasts and odontoblasts is crucial for their differentiation and function. Polarity-related molecules play an important role in this process. This review summarizes the process of polarity formation of ameloblasts and odontoblasts and their related regulators.
Ameloblasts
;
Cell Differentiation
;
Odontoblasts
4.The biological effects of fibronectin typeIII 7-10 to MC3T3-E1 osteoblast.
Jeong Ug HONG ; Sang Mook CHOI ; Soo Boo HAN ; Chong Pyoung CHUNG ; In Chul RHYU ; Yong Moo LEE ; Young KU
The Journal of the Korean Academy of Periodontology 2002;32(1):143-160
No abstract available.
Cell Differentiation
;
Cell Proliferation
;
Fibronectins*
;
Osteoblasts*
;
Titanium
5.Neural Stem Cell Competition.
Neuroscience Bulletin 2024;40(2):277-279
7.Substitution for
Hao HUANG ; Chao-Zong LIU ; Teng YI ; Maryam TAMADDON ; Shan-Shan YUAN ; Zhen-Yun SHI ; Zi-Yu LIU
Chinese Medical Sciences Journal 2021;36(4):323-332
To get an optimal product of orthopaedic implant or regenerative medicine needs to follow trial-and-error analyses to investigate suitable product's material, structure, mechanical properites etc. The whole process from
Cell Differentiation
;
Cell Movement
;
Cell Proliferation
;
Computer Simulation
;
Tissue Engineering
8.The Current Status of Directed Differentiation Technology.
Hanyang Medical Reviews 2015;35(4):215-221
The direct reprogramming of a terminally differentiated cell into another lineage using defined combinations of factors has fundamentally changed traditional concepts of the inalterability of differentiated cells. Many studies have achieved direct conversion into various cell types in recent years, and this strategy is considered to be a promising approach for inducing functional cells. Here, we review work on direct reprogramming, from the early pioneering studies to the most recent, including the discovery of novel reprogramming factors, molecular mechanisms, and strategies. We also discuss the applications of direct reprogramming and the perspectives and challenges of this novel technology.
Cell Differentiation
;
Regenerative Medicine
;
Transcription Factors
9.A Case of Follicular Adenoma Occurring in Congenital Goiter due to Dyshormogensis.
Jung Chul KIM ; Hyun Seup SIM ; Myoung Jea KANG ; Dae Yeol LEE
Journal of Korean Society of Pediatric Endocrinology 2002;7(1):112-115
Follicular adenoma is a benign encapsulated tumor with evidence of follicular cell differentiation. It is the most common thyroid neoplasm, usually solitary and has a well-defined fibrous capsule. We experienced a case of follicular adenoma occurring in congenital goiter and reported with the brief review of related literature
Adenoma*
;
Cell Differentiation
;
Goiter*
;
Thyroid Neoplasms
10.Comparison of alkaline phosphatase activity of MC3T3-E1 cells cultured on different Ti surfaces: modified sandblasted with large grit and acid-etched (MSLA), laser-treated, and laser and acid-treated Ti surfaces.
Lin Jie LI ; So Nam KIM ; Sung Am CHO
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics 2016;8(3):235-240
PURPOSE: In this study, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of implant surface treatment on cell differentiation of osteoblast cells. For this purpose, three surfaces were compared: (1) a modified SLA (MSLA: sand-blasted with large grit, acid-etched, and immersed in 0.9% NaCl), (2) a laser treatment (LT: laser treatment) titanium surface and (3) a laser and acid-treated (LAT: laser treatment, acid-etched) titanium surface. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The MSLA surfaces were considered as the control group, and LT and LAT surfaces as test groups. Alkaline phosphatase expression (ALP) was used to quantify osteoblastic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cell. Surface roughness was evaluated by a contact profilometer (URFPAK-SV; Mitutoyo, Kawasaki, Japan) and characterized by two parameters: mean roughness (Ra) and maximum peak-to-valley height (Rt). RESULTS: Scanning electron microscope revealed that MSLA (control group) surface was not as rough as LT, LAT surface (test groups). Alkaline phosphatase expression, the measure of osteoblastic differentiation, and total ALP expression by surface-adherent cells were found to be highest at 21 days for all three surfaces tested (P<.05). Furthermore, ALP expression levels of MSLA and LAT surfaces were significantly higher than expression levels of LT surface-adherent cells at 7, 14, and 21 days, respectively (P<.05). However, ALP expression levels between MSLA and LAT surface were equal at 7, 14, and 21 days (P>.05). CONCLUSION: This study suggested that MSLA and LAT surfaces exhibited more favorable environment for osteoblast differentiation when compared with LT surface, the results that are important for implant surface modification studies.
Alkaline Phosphatase*
;
Cell Differentiation
;
Osteoblasts
;
Titanium