From 2011 to 2016, 16 regional trauma centers were designated throughout the country and 9 of the 16 centers have been operating their own trauma facilities. At present, there are some differences in treatment experiences and levels according to the type and size of the trauma centers. Treating the trauma system as a part of emergency medical service, while the field of severe trauma is clearly different from the rest of emergency medical service in particular, has become a serious problem in Korea. First of all, the role of trauma centers should have been established before they are added to the trauma care system. Beyond that, manpower is the most important factor in building a trauma center. Pusan National University Hospital offers the ideal environment for a study on the relationship between trauma centers and emergency centers. Pusan National University Hospital has 2 independent emergency rooms: one each in the trauma center and emergency center. Therefore, it is possible to compare the outcomes of 2 different emergency rooms and identify the proportion of the trauma population who is transferred from the emergency center to the trauma center due to trauma severity index. Ultimately, the government and individual hospitals must support personnel in each trauma centers administratively and financially to sustain trauma centers over the long term. The purpose of this proposal is to suggest some resolutions to the problems associated with the trauma care system in Korea.
Busan ; Emergencies ; Emergency Medical Services ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Korea* ; Trauma Centers* ; Trauma Severity Indices

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the injury severity and pain intensity according to age in patients with extremity injuries. METHODS: Adult patients with an extremity injury who visited the emergency department (ED) from June 1, 2016 to November 31, 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. The major injury was defined as structural damage below the muscle layer, such as muscle, ligament, and bone. Minor injury group and major injury group were separated according to this definition. The relationship of age and pain score assessed with the numerical rating scale (NRS) with the injury severity was analyzed. RESULTS: Of a total of 1,441 patients, the number of patients with a minor and major injury was 854 (59.3%) and 587 (40.7%), respectively. The proportion of patients aged 65 and older was 6.1% and 25.7% in the minor and major injury group, respectively. Age and NRS scale showed significantly positive associations with the injury severity (p < 0.001). In all NRS scores, the overall proportion of major injuries in the older age group was higher than that in the younger age group. Regardless of the younger ( < 65 years) or older (≥65 years) age group, the NRS score was positively related to the injury severity (young age group [odds ratio, 3.944]; older age group [odds ratio, 5.754]). CONCLUSION: The pain intensity is positively related to the severity of injury regardless of age. The pain intensity is the important factor of a patient assessment and treatment in the emergency department.
Adult ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Extremities* ; Humans ; Ligaments ; Pain Measurement ; Retrospective Studies ; Trauma Severity Indices

Humans ; Thoracic Injuries ; complications ; pathology ; Trauma Severity Indices ; Wounds, Nonpenetrating ; diagnosis ; etiology ; therapy

PURPOSEExsanguination is the most common leading cause of death in trauma patients. The massive transfusion (MT) protocol may influence therapeutic strategies and help provide blood components in timely manner. The assessment of blood consumption (ABC) score is a popular MT protocol but has low predictability. The lactate level is a good parameter to reflect poor tissue perfusion or shock states that can guide the management. This study aimed to modify the ABC scoring system by adding the lactate level for better prediction of MT.

METHODSThe data were retrospectively collected from 165 trauma patients following the trauma activated criteria at Songklanagarind Hospital from January 2014 to December 2014. The ABC scoring system was applied in all patients. The patients who had an ABC score ≥2 as the cut point for MT were defined as the ABC group. All patients who had a score ≥2 with a lactate level >4 mmol/dL were defined as the ABC plus lactate level (ABC + L) group. The prediction for the requirement of massive blood transfusion was compared between the ABC and ABC + L groups. The ability of ABC and ABC + L groups to predict MT was estimated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

RESULTSAmong 165 patients, 15 patients (9%) required massive blood transfusion. There were no significant differences in age, gender, mechanism of injury or initial vital signs between the MT group and the non-MT group. The group that required MT had a higher Injury Severity Score and mortality. The sensitivity and specificity of the ABC scoring system in our institution were low (81%, 34%, AUC 0.573). The sensitivity and specificity were significantly better in the ABC + L group (92%, 42%, AUC = 0.745).

CONCLUSIONThe ABC scoring system plus lactate increased the sensitivity and specificity compared with the ABC scoring system alone.

Adult ; Blood Transfusion ; Female ; Humans ; Lactic Acid ; blood ; Male ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Trauma Severity Indices

PURPOSE: Various scoring systems have been introduced in grading severity and predicting mortality of trauma patients. The objective of this study is to apply novel trauma scoring systems; BIG score (Base deficit (B), International normalized ratio (I), Glasgow Coma Scale (G)), Emergency Trauma Score (EMTRAS), Probability of Survival score version 12 (PS12), and MGAP (Mechanism, GCS, Age, Arterial pressure) to adults with major trauma, and to compare their performance with traditional systems; Injury Severity System (ISS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS). METHODS: Retrospective data collected between January 2011 and June 2012 from a regional trauma center registry on adult major trauma patients (Age> or =18, ISS> or =16) were used to identify factors associated with death. Univariate associations were calculated, and a multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine variables associated with hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 298 adult major trauma patients were retrieved in order to validate new trauma scoring systems. The median ISS was 22 [interquartile range (IQR) 17~25], and the hospital mortality rate was 30.9%. Traditional trauma scoring systems were each calculated to have an area under the curve of ISS 0.72 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67-0.77], TRISS 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.94), and RTS 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86-0.93). New trauma scoring systems were calculated to have an area under the curve of EMTRAS 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.94), BIG score 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86-0.93), PS12 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.94), and MGAP 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85-0.93). CONCLUSION: The new trauma scoring systems (EMTRAS, BIG, MGAP) were good predictors of mortality in adult major trauma patients on admission. They performed well compared to traditional trauma scoring systems (ISS, RTS, TRISS).
Adult* ; Emergencies ; Fatal Outcome ; Glasgow Coma Scale ; Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; International Normalized Ratio ; Logistic Models ; Mortality* ; Retrospective Studies ; Trauma Centers ; Trauma Severity Indices ; Triage

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the features of orbital fracture and to discuss its forensic expertise points. METHODS: One hundred and thirty cases of simple orbital fracture from 2010 to 2012 collected from one public security bureau were retrospectively analyzed such as age, gender, tools, position and morphology of the fracture, periorbital and orbital compound injury and the follow-up results after 6 months. RESULTS: In the 130 cases, the wounded were mainly young men and hit by fist. The fracture of simple medial orbital wall accounted for up to 81.5% in all cases. In the periorbital and orbital compound injury, laceration and contusion of eyelid and ethmoidal cellules and maxillary sinus always occurred. After 6 months follow-up, there were 30 cases of comminuted fracture remained enophthalmos compared with the uninjured side. CONCLUSION It is inappropriate to judge the fracture of simple medial orbital wall as minor injury. We should judge the degree of simple orbital fracture after the injury is stable. Detailed ophthalmology inspection is necessary for forensic expertise of simple orbital fracture.
Craniocerebral Trauma ; Enophthalmos ; Female ; Fractures, Comminuted/pathology* ; Humans ; Male ; Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures ; Orbit ; Orbital Fractures/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies ; Severity of Illness Index ; Trauma Severity Indices

OBJECTIVEDetection of abdominal injury is a very important component in trauma management, so a precise assessment of liver and spleen injuries including their severity degree is necessary. There is a good case to believe that in emergency situations the radiologists' performance may profit from a systematic approach using established scoring systems. Score systems as the organ injury scale (OIS) drawn up by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma are a valuable guidance for objective trauma assessment. Aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively whether a structured approach using the OIS may help improve trauma assessment.

METHODSFifty-three patients, 38 male and 15 female who underwent CT and laparotomy after abdominal trauma were included in this study. The laparotomy was performed by experienced surgeons with a minimum experience of 6 years. While the original CT reports were written by different radiologists with a minimum experience of 3 years, and then a radiologist with experience of 4 years reviewed the same original CT pictures, resulting in the structured report. Both the original and structured CT results on liver and spleen injuries were transferred into OIS grades. Finally, the initial and structured CT results were compared with the intraoperative findings gathered from the surgery report.

RESULTSRegarding the original CT report we found a mean divergence of 0.68 ± 0.8 (r=0.45) to the OIS finding in the surgery report for liver injuries (0.69 ± 1.17 for spleen injuries; r=0.69). In comparison with the structured approach, where we detected a divergence of 0.8 ± 0.68; r=0.63 (0.47 ± 0.77 for spleen injuries; r=0.91), there was no significant difference. However we detected a lower rate of over-diagnosis in structured approaches.

CONCLUSIONOur study shows that a structured approach to triage abdominal trauma using an imaging checklist does not lead to a significantly higher detection rate, but a nonsignificant trend to reduce the rate of over-diagnoses, thus being more precise in grading the severity grade. Concerning the bias by retrospective study design, further prospective investigations are needed to evaluate the impact of trauma scores on the workflow in emergency department procedure as structured reporting systems are a valuable guidance in other radiological disciplines.

Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Liver ; diagnostic imaging ; injuries ; Male ; Radiography ; Retrospective Studies ; Spleen ; diagnostic imaging ; injuries ; Trauma Severity Indices

OBJECTIVE: To study the correlation of daily living activities with location and severity of trau- matic brain injury (TBI) and to provide a theoretical basis for improving the accuracy of expert opinion. METHODS: Five hundred and one cases of patients with TBI were selected. Detailed records included following: pre-injury situation, location and severity of injury, treatment and education. Daily living activi- ties scale (Barthel index) was applied to test the subjects' daily living activities. The relevance among location and severity of TBI and Barthel index was statistically analyzed. RESULTS: In mild TBI group, there was no significant difference in Barthel index among each location (P>0.05). In moderate TBI group, there were significant differences in Barthel index between subarachnoid hemorrhage and cerebral lobe injury, also between parietal, occipital lobes injury and frontal lobe injury, parietal, occipital lobes injury and temporal lobe (P<0.05), respectively, whereas no significant difference in Barthel index between frontal lobe injury and temporal lobe injury (P>0.05). In severe TBI, there were significant differences in Barthel index between every two different locations (P<0.05). CONCLUSION There is some correlation between the location of TBI and Barthel index, which provides an important reference value for analyzing and determining daily living activities after TBI.
Activities of Daily Living ; Adult ; Brain Injuries/rehabilitation* ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care ; Trauma Severity Indices

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the application value for the prognosis of mechanical ocular injury cases using ocular trauma score (OTS). METHODS: Four hundred and eleven cases of mechanical ocular trauma were retrospectively reviewed. Of the 449 eyes, there were 317 closed globe injury and 132 open globe injury. OTS variables included numerical values as initial visual acuity, rupture, endophthalmitis, perforat- ing or penetrating injury, retinal detachment and relative afferent pupillary block. The differences be- tween the distribution of the final visual acuity and the probability of standard final visual acuity were compared to analyze the correlation between OTS category and final visual acuity. The different types of ocular trauma were compared. RESULTS: Compared with the distribution of final visual acuity in standard OTS score, the ratio in OTS-3 category was statistically different in present study, and no differences were found in other categories. Final visual acuity showed a great linear correlation with OTS category (r = 0.71) and total score (r = 0.73). Compared with closed globe injury, open globe injury was generally associated with lower total score and poorer prognosis. Rupture injury had poorer prognosis compared with penetrating injury. CONCLUSION The use of OTS for the patients with ocular trauma can provide re- liable information for the evaluation of prognosis in forensic medicine.
Eye Injuries/diagnosis* ; Forensic Medicine ; Humans ; Probability ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Rupture ; Trauma Severity Indices ; Visual Acuity ; Wounds, Penetrating

Objective To explore the applied value of mismatch negative （MMN） in evaluation of severity of mental disorders due to traumatic brain injury. Methods Thirty-five patients（case group） that conform to the diagnostic criteria of organic （traumatic brain injury） mental disorder in ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders criteria were selected. Twenty-four healthy subjects （normal control group） that matched the case group in terms of gender, age composition ratio and educational level were selected. All subjects were evaluated by Activity of Daily Living Scale （ADL） and Social Disability Screening Schedule （SDSS） and then examined by Event-Related Potential （ERP）. A statistical analysis of the data was made by SPSS 22.0 software. Results The 32 patients and 24 normal control subjects completed the study. The scores of ADL and SDSS were significantly higher in the case group than in the normal control group （P<0.05）. The latency of Fz, FCz, Cz and Pz in the case group was significantly longer than that in the normal control group （P<0.05）. In the case group, the latency of Fz, FCz, Cz and Pz was positively correlated with the scores of ADL and SDSS （P<0.05）. The equation can be well fitted with the scores of ADL and SDSS. The latency and amplitude of Fz, FCz, Cz and Pz were used as concomitant variables and whether or not the subjects had mental disorders due to traumatic brain injury as dependent variables. Conclusion The latency of MMN can be used as an indicator in potential evaluation of the severity of mental disorders due to traumatic brain injury, which means that the longer the latency of MMN is, the more severe mental disorders due to traumatic brain injury may be. The combined application of ADL, SDSS and MMN can be an objective indicator in preliminary judgment of mental disorders due to traumatic brain injury.
Activities of Daily Living ; Brain Injuries, Traumatic/complications* ; Disabled Persons ; Evoked Potentials ; Humans ; Mental Disorders/etiology* ; Software ; Trauma Severity Indices