PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of the T1 3D subtraction technique and the conventional 2D dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) technique in diagnosing Cushing's disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with clinically and biochemically proven Cushing's disease were included in the study. In addition, 23 patients with a Rathke's cleft cyst (RCC) diagnosed on an MRI with normal pituitary hormone levels were included as a control, to prevent non-blinded positive results. Postcontrast T1 3D fast spin echo (FSE) images were acquired after DCE images in 3T MRI and image subtraction of pre- and postcontrast T1 3D FSE images were performed. Inter-observer agreement, interpretation time, multiobserver receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and net benefit analyses were performed to compare 2D DCE and T1 3D subtraction techniques. RESULTS: Inter-observer agreement for a visual scale of contrast enhancement was poor in DCE (κ = 0.57) and good in T1 3D subtraction images (κ = 0.75). The time taken for determining contrast-enhancement in pituitary lesions was significantly shorter in the T1 3D subtraction images compared to the DCE sequence (P < 0.05). ROC values demonstrated increased reader confidence range with T1 3D subtraction images (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94–1.00) compared with DCE (95% CI: 0.70–0.92) (P < 0.01). The net benefit effect of T1 3D subtraction images over DCE was 0.34 (95% CI: 0.12–0.56). For Cushing's disease, both reviewers misclassified one case as a nonenhancing lesion on the DCE images, while no cases were misclassified on T1 3D subtraction images. CONCLUSION: The T1 3D subtraction technique shows superior performance for determining the presence of enhancement on pituitary lesions compared with conventional DCE techniques, which may aid in diagnosing Cushing's disease.
Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; ROC Curve ; Subtraction Technique

PURPOSE: To assess the usefulness of digital subtraction contrast-enhanced multi-phase magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for evaluation of the vessels of the gastrointestinal system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients who underwent abdominal MRA for evaluation of the vessels of the gastrointestinal system were included in this study. MRA was performed using a 1.5-T scanner and the 3-D turbo-FLASH sequence. Subtraction images of the arterial and portal venous phases were obtained by subtracting arterial phase images from mask images and portal venous phase images from arterial phase images, respectively. Each set of images was processed using a maximum-intensity projection (MIP) algorithm to produce three-dimensional angiograms. We compared overall image quality and the visibility of normal and abnormal vessels between subtraction and non-subtraction MRA. RESULTS: In terms of subjective image quality, subtraction and non-subtraction MRA was similar both the arterial and portal venous phases (p>0.05). During the arterial phase, subtraction MRA visualized more peripheral branches of the left gastric and superior mesenteric arteries than non-subtraction MRA (p<0.05), and during the portal venous phase, subtraction MRA demonstrated more peripheral branches of the superior mesenteric (p<0.01), splenic (p<0.05) and left portal vein (p<0.05) than non-subtraction MRA. In addition, overall visibility of the arterial and portal venous branches was superior with subtraction MRAs than with non-subtraction MRA. Both of these detected all anomalous arterial branching (n=5) and abnormal (encased or obstructed) portal veins (n=5). Subtraction MRA visualized 17 portal venous collaterals in six patients, whereas non-subtraction MRA visualized only seven collateral veins. CONCLUSION: In contrast-enhanced abdominal MRA, the digital subtraction technique permits visualization of more distal branches of the vessels of both the arterial and portal venous systems without significant degradation of image quality. The technique is particularly useful for the detection of portal venous collaterals in patients with portal hypertension.
Angiography* ; Angiography, Digital Subtraction ; Humans ; Hypertension, Portal ; Magnetic Resonance Angiography ; Masks ; Mesenteric Artery, Superior ; Portal Vein ; Subtraction Technique* ; Veins

PURPOSE: Erosions and osteophytes are radiographic characteristics that are found in different stages of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) osteoarthritis. This study assessed the effectiveness of digital subtraction radiography (DSR) in diagnosing simulated osteophytes and erosions in the TMJ. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five intact, dry human skulls were used to assess the effectiveness of DSR in detecting osteophytes. Four cortical bone chips of varying thicknesses (0.5 mm, 1.0 mm, 1.5 mm, and 2.0 mm) were placed at the medial, central, and lateral aspects of the condyle anterior surface. Two defects of varying depth (1.0 mm and 1.5 mm) were created on the lateral, central, and medial poles of the condyles of 2 skulls to simulate erosions. Panoramic images of the condyles were acquired before and after artificially creating the changes. Digital subtraction was performed with Emago dental image archiving software. Five observers familiar with the interpretation of TMJ radiographs evaluated the images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the imaging methods. RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve (Az) value for the overall diagnostic accuracy of DSR in detecting osteophytic changes was 0.931. The Az value for the overall diagnostic accuracy of panoramic imaging was 0.695. The accuracy of DSR in detecting erosive changes was 0.854 and 0.696 for panoramic imaging. DSR was remarkably more accurate than panoramic imaging in detecting simulated osteophytic and erosive changes. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of panoramic imaging in detecting degenerative changes was significantly lower than the accuracy of DSR (P<.05). DSR improved the accuracy of detection using panoramic images.
Humans ; Osteoarthritis ; Osteophyte* ; Radiography* ; Radiography, Panoramic ; ROC Curve ; Skull ; Subtraction Technique ; Temporomandibular Joint*

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of digital subtraction images acquired by two different methods different in positioning four reference points for geometrical standardization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 36 digital radiographic images of 6 volunteers were taken at the areas of the incisor, premolar, and molar of both the maxilla and mandible using the Digora system. Each image was moved 4 mm vertically and horizontally. Four oral and maxillofacial radiologists performed digital subtraction radiography between the paired images before and after movement using Emago (Oral Diagnostic Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) and Sunny (Biomedisys Co., Seoul, Korea). The standard deviation of the internal gray value in Region of Interest (ROI) was statistically analyzed between the two programs using the paired t-test. RESULTS: The standard deviation of pixel gray values from the digital subtraction images using the Sunny program were lower than that of the Emago program (p<0.05). All observers showed significant differences between each other when the Sunny program was used (p<0.05), but one observer showed a significantly higher score than other observers when they used Emago (p<0.05). The standard deviations of premolar area from both Sunny and Emago programs were significantly higher than those of anterior and molar regions (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The subtracted images using the Sunny program were more accurate and sensitive than those taken using the Emago program.
Bicuspid ; Incisor ; Mandible ; Maxilla ; Molar ; Radiography* ; Radiography, Dental, Digital ; Seoul ; Subtraction Technique ; Volunteers

PURPOSE: This study was performed to compare the diagnostic ability of conventional intraoral radiographs with that of digital subtraction image and to assess the quantifying ability of digital subtraction image for simulated apical root resorption MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conventional intraoral radiographs and digital images of ten sound maxillary central incisors and those with simulated apical root resorption were taken with varying horizontal and vertical angulations of the x-ray beam. The diagnostic accuracy to detect the lesion was evaluated on conventional intraoral radiographs and digital subtraction images by ROC analysis. The amount of simulated apical root resorption was also estimated on the reconstruction images by Emago(R) and compared with actual amount of tooth loss using paired t-test. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy of conventional intraoral radiographs to detect the apical root resorption was low (ROC area = 0.6446), and the sensitivity and the specificity of digital subtraction images were 100%, respectively. The calculated amounts of apical root resorption showed no statistically significant difference with the actual amounts of the lesion (p>.05). CONCLUSION: Digital subtraction radiography is powerful tool to detect the small apical root resorption, and quantitative analysis of small amounts of the lesion can be evaluated by digital subtraction radiography.
Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Incisor ; Radiography* ; ROC Curve ; Root Resorption* ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Subtraction Technique ; Tooth Loss

PURPOSE: To compare the standard deviation of gray levels on digital subtracted images obtained by different dental subtraction programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Paired periapical films were taken at the lower premolar and molar areas of the phantoms involving human mandible. The bite registration group used Rinn XCP equipment and bite registration material, based on polyvinyl siloxane, for standardization. The no bite registration group used only Rinn XCP equipment. The periapical film images were digitized at 1200 dpi resolution and 256 gray levels by a flat bed scanner with transparency unit. Dental digital subtraction programs used for this study were Subtractor (Biomedisys Co., Korea) and Emago (Oral Diagnostic Systems, The Netherlands). To measure the similarities between the subtracted images, the standard deviations of the gray levels were obtained using a histogram of subtracted images, which were then analyzed statistically. RESULTS: Subtracted images obtained by using the Emago program without manual selection of corresponding points showed the lowest standard deviation of gray levels (p<0.01). And the standard deviation of gray levels was lower in subtracted images in the group of a bite registration than in the group of no use of bite registration (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Digital radiographic subtraction without manual selection of reference points was found to be a convenient and superior method.
Bicuspid ; Humans ; Jaw Relation Record ; Mandible ; Molar ; Polyvinyls ; Radiography ; Siloxanes ; Subtraction Technique

PURPOSE: To compare the standard deviation of gray levels on digital subtracted images obtained by different dental subtraction programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Paired periapical films were taken at the lower premolar and molar areas of the phantoms involving human mandible. The bite registration group used Rinn XCP equipment and bite registration material, based on polyvinyl siloxane, for standardization. The no bite registration group used only Rinn XCP equipment. The periapical film images were digitized at 1200 dpi resolution and 256 gray levels by a flat bed scanner with transparency unit. Dental digital subtraction programs used for this study were Subtractor (Biomedisys Co., Korea) and Emago (Oral Diagnostic Systems, The Netherlands). To measure the similarities between the subtracted images, the standard deviations of the gray levels were obtained using a histogram of subtracted images, which were then analyzed statistically. RESULTS: Subtracted images obtained by using the Emago program without manual selection of corresponding points showed the lowest standard deviation of gray levels (p<0.01). And the standard deviation of gray levels was lower in subtracted images in the group of a bite registration than in the group of no use of bite registration (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Digital radiographic subtraction without manual selection of reference points was found to be a convenient and superior method.
Bicuspid ; Humans ; Jaw Relation Record ; Mandible ; Molar ; Polyvinyls ; Radiography ; Siloxanes ; Subtraction Technique

PURPOSE: To determine whether subtraction images utilizing contrast media can improve the diagnostic performance of proximal caries diagnosis compared to conventional periapical radiographic images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six teeth with 57 proximal surfaces were radiographied using a size #2 RVG-ui sensor (Trophy Radiology, Marne-la-Vallee, France). The teeth immersed in water-soluble contrast media and subtraction images were taken. Each tooth was then sectioned for histologic examination. The digital radiographic images and subtraction images were examined and interpreted by three dentists for proximal caries. The results of the proximal caries diagnosis were then verified with the results of the histologic examination. RESULTS: The proximal caries sensitivity using digital subtraction radiography was significantly higher than simply examining a single digital radiograph. The sensitivity of the proximal dentinal carious lesion when analyzed with the subtraction radiograph and the radiograph together was higher than with the subtraction radiograph or the radiograph alone. CONCLUSION: The use of subtraction radiography with contrast media may be useful for detecting proximal dentinal carious lesions.
Contrast Media ; Dental Caries ; Dentin ; Dentists ; Diagnosis* ; Humans ; Radiography* ; Subtraction Technique ; Tooth

PURPOSE: To determine whether subtraction images utilizing contrast media can improve the diagnostic performance of proximal caries diagnosis compared to conventional periapical radiographic images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six teeth with 57 proximal surfaces were radiographied using a size #2 RVG-ui sensor (Trophy Radiology, Marne-la-Vallee, France). The teeth immersed in water-soluble contrast media and subtraction images were taken. Each tooth was then sectioned for histologic examination. The digital radiographic images and subtraction images were examined and interpreted by three dentists for proximal caries. The results of the proximal caries diagnosis were then verified with the results of the histologic examination. RESULTS: The proximal caries sensitivity using digital subtraction radiography was significantly higher than simply examining a single digital radiograph. The sensitivity of the proximal dentinal carious lesion when analyzed with the subtraction radiograph and the radiograph together was higher than with the subtraction radiograph or the radiograph alone. CONCLUSION: The use of subtraction radiography with contrast media may be useful for detecting proximal dentinal carious lesions.
Contrast Media ; Dental Caries ; Dentin ; Dentists ; Diagnosis* ; Humans ; Radiography* ; Subtraction Technique ; Tooth

PURPOSE: This study employed a posteriori registration and subtraction of radiographic images to quantify the apical root resorption in maxillary permanent central incisors after orthodontic treatment, and assessed whether the external apical root resorption (EARR) was related to a range of parameters involved in the treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of 79 patients (mean age, 13.5±2.2 years) with no history of trauma or endodontic treatment of the maxillary permanent central incisors was selected. Periapical radiographs taken before and after orthodontic treatment were digitized and imported to the Regeemy software. Based on an analysis of the posttreatment radiographs, the length of the incisors was measured using Image J software. The mean EARR was described in pixels and relative root resorption (%). The patient's age and gender, tooth extraction, use of elastics, and treatment duration were evaluated to identify possible correlations with EARR. RESULTS: The mean EARR observed was 15.44±12.1 pixels (5.1% resorption). No differences in the mean EARR were observed according to patient characteristics (gender, age) or treatment parameters (use of elastics, treatment duration). The only parameter that influenced the mean EARR of a patient was the need for tooth extraction. CONCLUSION: A posteriori registration and subtraction of periapical radiographs was a suitable method to quantify EARR after orthodontic treatment, and the need for tooth extraction increased the extent of root resorption after orthodontic treatment.
Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Incisor ; Orthodontics ; Root Resorption* ; Subtraction Technique ; Tooth Extraction