1.The preventive effects of the heparin-coated coronary stent in a porcine coronary stent restenosis model.
Korean Journal of Medicine 1999;57(6):1070-1072
No abstract available.
Stents*
2.The Future Perspective of Coronary Stent.
Journal of the Korean Society for Vascular Surgery 2008;24(2):171-173
No abstract available.
Stents
3.An experimental study on the influence of the intravasculargianturco tupe stents on the vascular structures.
Yeon Hyeon CHOE ; Jae Hyung PARK ; Joon Koo HAN ; Man Chung HAN ; Chu Wan KIM
Journal of the Korean Radiological Society 1991;27(4):431-439
No abstract available.
Stents*
4.Extracranial Carotid Stenting.
Korean Circulation Journal 1997;27(8):906-908
No abstract available.
Stents*
5.Pseudocholangiocarcinoma Sign: Management of Portal Cavernoma Biliopathy with Fully-Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stent.
Luís C LOURENÇO ; David V HORTA ; Catarina G RODRIGUES ; Jorge CANENA ; Jorge REIS
Clinical Endoscopy 2017;50(3):305-307
No abstract available.
Stents*
6.Mechanical Characteristics of Self-expandable Metallic Stents: In Vitro Study with Three of Stress.
Byung Hee LEE ; Kie Hwan KIM ; Soo Yil CHIN
Journal of the Korean Radiological Society 1998;39(3):497-502
PURPOSE: To obtain objective and comparable date for mechanical characteristics of self-expandable metallicstents widely used in the treatment of biliary obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The stents tested were the 6and 9 mm-band Hanaro spiral stent, Gianturco-R sch Z stent, Wallstent, Ultraflex stent, and Memotherm stent. Eachwas subjected to three types of load : point, area, and circular. We analyzed their mechanical characteristics(resistance force, expansile force, and elasticity) according to these three types of stress. RESULTS: Withregard to point loads, the Memotherm stent showed the highest resistance force and expansile force. The 8 mm-bandhanaro stent showed the lowest resistance force and the Gianturco-R sch Z stent and Ultraflex stent showed lowerexpansile force. With regard to area loads, the Ultraflex stent showed the highest resistance force. The 6 mm-bandHanaro stent, Gianturco-R sch Z stent, and Ultraflex stent showed higher expansile force. The 8 mm-band Hanarostent showed the lowest value in both resistance force and expansile force. For circular loads, the Memothermstent showed the highest resistance force and the Ultraflex stent and Wallstent showed lower Value. Under alltypes of stress, the Hanaro stent and Memotherm stent were completel elastic, and the Ultraflex stent andWallstent showed a wide gap between resistance force and expansile force. CONCLUSION: In clinical practice,awareness of the mechanical characteristics of each stent might help in choosing the one which is most suitable,according to type of biliary obstruction.
Stents*
7.Small vessel intervention with BiodivYsio Phosphorylcholine-coated Coronary Stent.
Korean Journal of Medicine 2002;63(3):243-245
No abstract available.
Stents*
8.Small vessel intervention with BiodivYsio Phosphorylcholine-coated Coronary Stent.
Korean Journal of Medicine 2002;63(3):243-245
No abstract available.
Stents*
9.Coronary Stenting in Diffuse Lesion: Is it Effective as in the Stress/Benestem Lesion?.
Korean Circulation Journal 1997;27(9):819-820
No abstract available.
Stents*
10.Is Cilostazol Effective in the Prevention of Coronary Stent Restenosis?.
Youngkeun AHN ; Myung Ho JEONG
Korean Circulation Journal 2004;34(5):441-442
No abstract available.
Stents*
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail