1.Test of predictive validity for the new pressure risk assessment scale..
Kyung Sook CHOI ; Mi Soon SONG
Journal of Korean Academy of Adult Nursing 1991;3(1):19-28
No abstract available.
Risk Assessment*
2.Benefits and risks of sugammadex.
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2015;68(1):1-2
No abstract available.
Risk Assessment*
4.European Approaches to Work-Related Stress: A Critical Review on Risk Evaluation.
Silvia ZONI ; Roberto G LUCCHINI
Safety and Health at Work 2012;3(1):43-49
In recent years, various international organizations have raised awareness regarding psychosocial risks and work-related stress. European stakeholders have also taken action on these issues by producing important documents, such as position papers and government regulations, which are reviewed in this article. In particular, 4 European models that have been developed for the assessment and management of work-related stress are considered here. Although important advances have been made in the understanding of work-related stress, there are still gaps in the translation of this knowledge into effective practice at the enterprise level. There are additional problems regarding the methodology in the evaluation of work-related stress. The European models described in this article are based on holistic, global and participatory approaches, where the active role of and involvement of workers are always emphasized. The limitations of these models are in the lack of clarity on preventive intervention and, for two of them, the lack of instrument standardization for risk evaluation. The comparison among the European models to approach work-related stress, although with limitations and socio-cultural differences, offers the possibility for the development of a social dialogue that is important in defining the correct and practical methodology for work stress evaluation and prevention.
Government Regulation
;
Risk Assessment
5.Establishment and application of public health risk assessment indexes for flood disaster.
Jiabing WU ; Lei GONG ; Fang CHEN ; Dandan SONG ; Wanwan MA ; Sai HOU
Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences 2018;47(2):118-123
OBJECTIVETo establish a public health risk assessment indexes for flood disaster.
METHODSDelphi method and expert consultation were used to establish the public health risk assessment index system and scoring criteria, and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method was used to obtain the weight of the indexes. Then, the established index system was applied to evaluate the public health risk of the flood disaster in Anhui province, 2016.
RESULTSA public health risk assessment system consisting of 5 categories and 17 indexes was constructed. The assessment result of the flood disaster in Anhui province of 2016 showed that the public health risk score was 0.26, suggesting that "the health emergency measures were effective, and the public health risks were effectively controlled".
CONCLUSIONSThe established indexes can effectively assess the health risk of flood disaster and also can provide the reference for other disaster assessment.
Disasters ; Floods ; Risk Assessment
6.Release of Bisphenol A From Polycarbonate and Polyethylene Terephthalate Drinking Water Bottles Under Different Storage Conditions and Its Associated Health Risk
Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences 2018;14(SP2):18-26
Introduction: Bisphenol A (BPA) is a controversial plastics ingredient used mainly in the production of polycarbonate plastics (PC) and epoxy resins that widely used nowadays in food and drink packaging. Even though BPA is not involved in polyethylene terephthalate (PET) manufacturing, recent study had reported the present of BPA in PET water bottle. This study was conducted to investigate effects storage conditions on release of BPA from PC and PET bottled water as well as to assess health risks associated with consumption. Methods: Solid phase extraction (SPE) was used to extract the samples, followed by analysis using ultra high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detector (UHPLC-FLD). The possibility of developing chronic non-carcinogenic health risk among consumers of bottled water was evaluated using hazard quotient (HQ). Results: Results showed that BPA migrated from PC and PET water bottles at concentrations ranging from 9.13 to 257.67 ng/L and 11.53 ng/L to 269.87 ng/L respectively. Concentrations of BPA were higher in PET bottled water compared to PC bottled water across all storage conditions. Higher storage temperature and longer storage duration increased BPA concentrations in PC and PET bottled water. Concentrations of BPA in bottled water which were kept in a car and were exposed to sunlight were higher than control samples which were stored indoor at room temperature. Conclusion: No significant chronic non-carcinogenic health risks were calculated for daily ingestion of BPA-contaminated bottled water; calculated HQ was less than one.
Health risk assessment
7.Risk of bias assessment: (9) Application of the risk of bias assessment results.
Y ZHANG ; Z R YANG ; F SUN ; S Y ZHAN
Chinese Journal of Epidemiology 2018;39(12):1648-1654
In this last paper of the series about risk of bias assessment, we introduce the application of risk of bias assessment results. Risk of bias assessment is one of the key steps in the assessment of quality of evidence. The risk of bias assessment results could be the "diagnosis" of individual studies, which helps decision making related to the inclusion and exclusion of individual studies, as well as the data analysis in the systematic review process. This paper focuses on how to incorporate risk of bias assessment results in the GRADE assessment for quality of evidence, including the principles and the tips for the application.
Bias
;
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
;
Risk Assessment
9.Usability and standards of medical devices.
Chinese Journal of Medical Instrumentation 2010;34(1):47-49
This article discusses about the definition of usability of medical devices and introduces the related international standards. It describes the significance of usability and the relationship with the risk analysis. Some advices are given to improve the usability and reduce the risk of medical devices by explaining the standards.
Equipment Design
;
standards
;
Risk Assessment
10.Endoscopic Sedation: Risk Assessment and Monitoring.
Clinical Endoscopy 2014;47(2):151-154
Sedation for endoscopic procedures is done to increase patient comfort and endoscopic performance. Drugs used for sedation suppress respiratory and cardiovascular function, and while the degree of suppression may vary, it may be fatal in certain patients. The aim of this article is to provide an overview and brief summary of presedation risk assessment and monitoring during and after sedation in order to maintain patient safety.
Humans
;
Patient Safety
;
Risk Assessment*